[DHT]Osiris
Lifer
- Dec 15, 2015
- 14,659
- 12,782
- 146
I don't think this is the case at all. I think the die-hard Trump supporters will see this as vindication for Trump's constant bleating about 'deep state' and whatnot, they'll see it as a betrayal from within the White House, not as a no-confidence vote from the WH staff regarding the elected head of the executive branch.Not so much that Trump has been outed to the majority of Americans who already see Trump for who he really is, but this op/ed surely must have been a stab in the chest to Trump's supporters. It really is a confirmation of Trump's unfitness for office that his supporters must now have to face up to, a painful wake up call of sorts that even insiders who were supposedly intimately loyal to Trump have turned on him because he is an actual present threat to the security of the nation.
If it was decided this, it was a pretty shittacular way to go about it. All this shows is that we've got a severe weakness in our governmental process, in that a group of random, non-elected individuals can wrest control of the nation away from the democratically elected head of state whenever they feel like it. We've shifted from 'trusting' that the person we elected will do-right, to 'trusting' that the people that person appoints will do-right. I worry more about the latter, because for the most part those individuals scurry around under the radar for most presidencies.Is it possible that it was decided by Trump's inner circle that outing Trump in this way was the most effective means to firmly put Trump in his place so as to wrest control of the White House away from him and thus force Trump to listen to reason, turn him into a mere figurehead and very much so a way to terminally cut off Putin's influence over Trump thus the nation he leads?
With sufficient transparency, this isn't a crisis-level event, but I don't trust that we'll have that level of transparency.