Guess you dont know what unalienable rights are.
"...that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights..."
That's from the declaration of independence, not the constitution, and it's pretty clear that constitutional rights aren't inalienable.
And the Constitution was established to support what? Could it be the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence? Those principles are really what made the idea of America exceptional, that all human beings are born with inalienable rights by virtue of birth. Regarding the argument over including anything like the Bill of Rights in the Constitution it seems to me that both sides have been somewhat proven to be correct: Without it we would not enjoy the liberties we currently still retain and due to their inclusion far too many Americans believe those rights are granted to them by the Constitution/government.
/facepalm Yeah, how unreasonable of me to ask you to provide evidence for your assertions. Is providing a link really that hard?
eskimospy, Obama is WORSE than Bush in these offenses because the side he plays for got their panties in a wad over their enemy doing it. Being a douche AND a hypocrite is worse than being just a douche.
also, just because idiots choose to be idiots and alienate our rights, doesn't mean they aren't supposed to be. a lot of people do things they aren't supposed to do. derpdy do that's pretty much what ever thread in these forums is about.
Well at the time I was on an Android so yes it was. A cursory look using a search engine provides everything you would want to know. Look or not, that's up to you but if others do they'll see what I'm referring to. Yahoo, mobile phones etc. Not only that, but there's so much about it that it would take some time to itemize it all for you.
On the other hand perhaps ignorance is bliss. Your call.
So in that situation you could either say 'I'm on a phone right now, can't look it up', you could just mention the issues specifically such as Yahoo, mobile phones, etc, or you could be an asshole.
Your call.
I can't quite figure out why Righties hate Obama so much, given that he just picked up their hero's (GWB's) ball and ran with it in this and many other regards.
I'm sure, however, that if he vigorously defended privacy rights that his current detractors would rave about how he's "Soft on Crime!"
Go Figure.
I can't quite figure out why Righties hate Obama so much, given that he just picked up their hero's (GWB's) ball and ran with it in this and many other regards.
I'm sure, however, that if he vigorously defended privacy rights that his current detractors would rave about how he's "Soft on Crime!"
Go Figure.
I cant quite figue out why lefties defend obama so much when its clear he has no idea what he is doing and has bankrupt this country in just 2 years.... please tell me why you guys do this?
before you even start to call me a right wing hack let me tell you i hate political parties and in my opinion a bane to our country. I don't give a shit who is in office if they are fucking up ill call them on it.
I didn't defend Obama, at all. I pointed out that the same voices raving about this are the same ones that supported the Patriot Act, illegal wiretapping, indefinite detention, the invasion of Iraq and a few other minor details of recent history. They have no principles- they oppose it because Obama is doing it. They cheered when Bush did much the same.
Like I said- Go Figure.
Guess you dont know what unalienable rights are.
"...that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights..."
Warrantless GPS tracking doesn't bother me, I don't make stupid or threatening Facebook messages, not a drug dealer, not associated w/ organized crime. People that should worry are those that make threatening comments about the country, towards other people, are dealers, affiliated w/ organized crime, not ordinary citizens no matter how paranoid they are.
Wow, land of the free doest mean jack shit anymore