So if Obama is to blame for all this, can someone please explain how he, the president can change it? How could he directly improve each item on the list?
Wall street still in charge of our money.
Banks still to big to bail or fail.
Killing US citizens without due process.
Relations with Russia gone down the drain.
Tensions with China on the rise.
Economy still in the crapper.
Eased trade sanctions on Iran.
Gave weapons to egypt, who knows where they are now.
IS gaining access to anti-aircraft weapons.
Snubbed England over Thatchers funeral.
Race is not an issue here.
The issue here is incompetence. However, obama could make up for that incompetence if he tried a little harder. Stop playing golf and take care of these pressing issues.
There was an article released today saying obama delayed the rescue of James Foley for a month. When the rescue did take place James had been moved.
Gee, figure that one out. Sounds to me like obama delayed the rescue just long enough for IS to move Foley.
Maybe because he needed to inform congress and he was just following the rules
After Jefferson made the Louisiana purchase, members of congress started asking if he had the authority to spend the money.
You know what Jefferson said?
Too bad, the deal has already been done.
Are you saying the president should circumvent congress if he feels the need to? Like he supposedly did with bowe bergdahl?
I feel the president can bypass congress when it serves the greater good.
Who is the judge of what serves the greater good?
I feel the president can bypass congress when it serves the greater good.
..what has obama done that has benefited everyday working people?
I feel the president can bypass congress when it serves the greater good.
Releasing terrorist in exchange for Bergdahl did not serve the greater good. The American people as a whole did not benefit from the release of Bergdahl.
If any of the people released harm the United States or any of our citizens, then obama indirectly allowed that harm to happen.
Who is the judge of what serves the greater good?
You are a mindless talking point addled twit. The release of Bergdahl serves the honor of the United States & the commitment we make to our soldiers.
If you took like a minute to try to see what he did, you would have some answers and not be perceived as a lazy obama hater.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=obama+administration+achievements
Now, you can do a pros and cons....
Did the release of Bergdahl benefit you or I? Probably not.
Did the Louisiana purchase benefit us? Yes it did.
That's irrelevant. You stated that the President should be allowed to do things without congressional approval when it serves the greater good. I'm curious how you think that "greater good" criteria is to be judged.
Did the release of Bergdahl benefit you or I? Probably not.
Did the Louisiana purchase benefit us? Yes it did.
Those soldiers volunteered. They knew the risk when they signed up.
Yeh, I'm sure they knew congress would leave them to rot when captured if it meant being able to beat Obama.
Have you no shame, no sense of decency?
And I answered your question.
Trading terrorist for an alleged deserter does not serve the greater good.
So in your opinion, the President should be allowed to operate without Congressional approval if what he is doing specifically meets the greater good as personally defined by you. Well I disagree, because that's not a President, that's a puppet dictator operating under your control, and I find that idea absurd and terrifying.
So you're saying that the life of an American citizen is worth less than that of a terrorist?You are being obtuse. You asked a question, I gave you an answer.
You did not like answer, so you proceeded to slobber, drool and foam at the mouth.
Rather than sending in a seal team or special forces, kill the terrorist and rescue Bergdahl, obama trades terrorist.
Tell me freeing terrorist is in the greater good.
So you're saying that the life of an American citizen is worth less than that of a terrorist?