Obama vows to veto House bill to extend payroll tax cut

[xBiffx]

Obviously this is the fault of the Republicans.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...vows-veto-house-gops-bill-extend-payroll-tax/

Apparently mathematics escapes the president. He might as well ask for 100% tax on the rich since it will get him just as far on the deficit/debt with the amount of spending he plans to do.

 

[JSt0rm]

You should be honest in your title and show that its because they attached the pipeline to the bill. but you arent so you didnt and this is because you are a hack.

 

[matt0611]

Why does Obama want to raise our taxes?

 

[JSt0rm]

Why does Obama want to raise our taxes?

He will pass it. He wants a clean bill with no poison pills. But again you are a hack and blinded to that fact.

 

[matt0611]

He will pass it. He wants a clean bill with no poison pills. But again you are a hack and blinded to that fact.

Fair enough, but in that article it says it was because it wasn't offset by tax increases on those with higher incomes.

 

[spidey07]

He will pass it. He wants a clean bill with no poison pills. But again you are a hack and blinded to that fact.

Why does he want to prevent 10s of thousands of jobs from being created AND keep taxes low?

This is a losing position for Obama, good job of republicans to paint him into this corner. It's a lose/lose for the president and win/win for Americans.

All this president has is his class warfare, that's it. That's all he's got.

 

[Ausm]

You should be honest in your title and show that its because they attached the pipeline to the bill. but you arent so you didnt and this is because you are a hack.

Would you expect anything else from Biff?

 

[xBiffx]

You should be honest in your title and show that its because they attached the pipeline to the bill. but you arent so you didnt and this is because you are a hack.

Hack? Because I choose not to add information that isn't contained in the story I am a hack. Had I done what you are suggesting, I would have been lambasted for posting shit that wasn't referenced, and rightfully so. You are always welcome to back up your posts with links, as I have. Of course, you can go on posting crap from that shitpile you call a brain as you continue to demonstrate you are more than capable.

 

[JSt0rm]

Fair enough, but in that article it says it was because it wasn't offset by tax increases on those with higher incomes.

There are 3 issues

1. payroll and ss tax cuts for 140 million people

2. tax increases on the top 1%

3. a pipeline for oil

So everybody wants the ss and payroll tax cuts but obama wants tax hike on the top 1%

repugs want a pipeline. It has nothing to do with the issue of taxes they just want to poison the bill that they made to get obama to veto a tax cut. Its just politics.

 

[Macamus Prime]

Why does he want to prevent 10s of thousands of jobs from being created AND keep taxes low?

These tax cuts never lead to job creation to begin with. Why don't you just leave it at where it's actually at; lower taxes for the rich - nothing more.

 

[matt0611]

There are 3 issues

1. payroll and ss tax cuts for 140 million people

2. tax increases on the top 1%

3. a pipeline for oil

So everybody wants the ss and payroll tax cuts but obama wants tax hike on the top 1%

repugs want a pipeline. It has nothing to do with the issue of taxes they just want to poison the bill that they made to get obama to veto a tax cut. Its just politics.

They should compromise and do #1 only IMO.

 

[Ausm]

There are 3 issues

1. payroll and ss tax cuts for 140 million people

2. tax increases on the top 1%

3. a pipeline for oil

So everybody wants the ss and payroll tax cuts but obama wants tax hike on the top 1%

repugs want a pipeline. It has nothing to do with the issue of taxes they just want to poison the bill that they made to get obama to veto a tax cut. Its just politics.

Well usually the GOP attaches social engineering amendments on every bill that goes to President Obama maybe they are trying something different?

 

[Patranus]

But but but it all the GOPs fault. Obama said so!

 

[JSt0rm]

Hack? Because I choose not to add information that isn't contained in the story I am a hack. Had I done what you are suggesting, I would have been lambasted for posting shit that wasn't referenced, and rightfully so. You are always welcome to back up your posts with links, as I have. Of course, you can go on posting crap from that shitpile you call a brain as you continue to demonstrate you are more than capable.

Personal attacks aside then your article is shit. I do believe that you didnt even realize the true issues and have the ability to find a unbiased source because you arent very smart.

Why should I spend my time finding links to crap that has been all over the news for the last 4 days? If you are incapable of even keeping up with current events why should I hold your hand to them?

Im not making some obscure claim that needs sources to back it up. This is shit that is all over the current news.

 

[xBiffx]

Personal attacks aside then your article is shit. I do believe that you didnt even realize the true issues and have the ability to find a unbiased source because you arent very smart.

Why should I spend my time finding links to crap that has been all over the news for the last 4 days? If you are incapable of even keeping up with current events why should I hold your hand to them?

Im not making some obscure claim that needs sources to back it up. This is shit that is all over the current news.

1. Personal attacks, ROFL. I think you confused attack with defense, since you began the attack in your post. And again attacking by calling me stupid while crying over personal attacks. Too funny.

2. I have heard of the pipeline deal as being part of this bill. I don't see that being a part of the quotes within the link that I posted.

3. You always have the option to back up you claims with links, unless you are too lazy to due so. If you have a news story that shows Obama threatening to veto because of the pipeline deal and not because he wants to raise taxes then please show it. This story specifically outlines taxes for the reason for the veto.

4. Put up or shut up.

 

[Ausm]

1. Personal attacks, ROFL. I think you confused attack with defense, since you began the attack in your post. And again attacking by calling me stupid while crying over personal attacks. Too funny.

2. I have heard of the pipeline deal as being part of this bill. I don't see that being a part of the quotes within the link that I posted.

3. You always have the option to back up you claims with links, unless you are too lazy to due so. If you have a news story that shows Obama threatening to veto because of the pipeline deal and not because he wants to raise taxes then please show it. This story specifically outlines taxes for the reason for the veto.

4. Put up or shut up.

LMAO Epeen much?

 

[JSt0rm]

1. Personal attacks, ROFL. I think you confused attack with defense, since you began the attack in your post. And again attacking by calling me stupid while crying over personal attacks. Too funny.

2. I have heard of the pipeline deal as being part of this bill. I don't see that being a part of the quotes within the link that I posted.

3. You always have the option to back up you claims with links, unless you are too lazy to due so. If you have a news story that shows Obama threatening to veto because of the pipeline deal and not because he wants to raise taxes then please show it. This story specifically outlines taxes for the reason for the veto.

4. Put up or shut up.

Look how dumb you are. Stop posting.

 

[xBiffx]

Look how dumb you are. Stop posting.

Typical and highly anticipated response.

 

[spidey07]

Typical and highly anticipated response.

You'll notice the left and liberals are getting more and more with personal insults and lashing out. This can be seen all across America.

They know they are defeated, they realize that obama may have been "what we've been waiting for" but are shocked this country is flat out rejecting him.

All they've got are insults now, that's why you can rest assured they are defeated.

 

[monovillage]

You should be honest in your title and show that its because they attached the pipeline to the bill. but you arent so you didnt and this is because you are a hack.

So not only does President Obama want to raise our taxes, but he wants us to pay more for oil and lose jobs while he does it? Thanks for the real story.

 

[Ausm]

So not only does President Obama want to raise our taxes, but he wants us to pay more for oil and lose jobs while he does it? Thanks for the real story.

You are dumb enough to believe that the oil sands will drop our oil prices?

Oh,I guess I just answered my question.

 

[cybrsage]

I do not understand why Obama is against the creation of tens of thousands of union jobs. Even before they added it to this bill, Obama said no to building the pipeline right now.

Why is that?

 

[JSt0rm]

Typical and highly anticipated response.

You'll notice the left and liberals are getting more and more with personal insults and lashing out. This can be seen all across America.

They know they are defeated, they realize that obama may have been "what we've been waiting for" but are shocked this country is flat out rejecting him.

All they've got are insults now, that's why you can rest assured they are defeated.

All either of you deserve are insults. People who want to have an actual debate about issues get them, if I have the time.

You are the dumbest of the dumb.

 

[PokerGuy]

So in summary, the post turtle is against creating new jobs, is against cheaper energy, and wants to raise everyone's taxes.

Lets make sure everyone keeps these things in mind as we head to 2012.

 

[JSt0rm]

I do not understand why Obama is against the creation of tens of thousands of union jobs. Even before they added it to this bill, Obama said no to building the pipeline right now.

Why is that?

Nobody respond to this fool. This is his way of dragging you into a long troll post that will take up hours of your day.