ObamaCare success... Not!

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Yes and how a majority of those stories are fact checked and turn out to be totally bogus. Yes, talking points.

It's ok, getting duped by propaganda is common and it happens to people all over the political spectrum.

I just point it out to you in hope that you don't wish to be a mindless parrot.

Oh please please please please give me a link to a fact check on those?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
...Because the total cost of health care would end up decreasing. People's total out-of-pocket health care costs would be much less as a result of eliminating the inefficiency of insurance companies, private hospitals, and all of the other expensive junk associated with our current health care system.

Let's compare the U.S. health care system with evil socialist systems:

U.S. Health Care system:

  • 17% of GDP
  • Tens of millions of uninsured and under-insured Americans
  • Hundreds of thousands of medical-cost-induced bankruptcies every year.
  • A terrified populace.
  • Businesses and an economy burdened by health insurance costs and concerns
  • Wealthy hospital and insurance company executives.
  • A thriving yacht industry (for those wealthy executives).

Evil Evil Socialized Medicine:

  • 12% or less of GDP
  • 100% full coverage
  • Zero medical cost induced bankruptcies
  • A contented populace that isn't terrified by health care cost issues.
  • Businesses and an economy unburdened by health insurance costs and concerns.
  • Far fewer wealthy hospital and insurance company executives (oh, the horror!)
  • An emaciated yacht industry (oh the horror!)

I don't give a rat's ass about some numbers pulled out of somewhere. This country wasn't founded on Socialist principals, so why the hell are trying to emulate Socialist governments?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
...Because the total cost of health care would end up decreasing. People's total out-of-pocket health care costs would be much less as a result of eliminating the inefficiency of insurance companies, private hospitals, and all of the other expensive junk associated with our current health care system.

Let's compare the U.S. health care system with evil socialist systems:

U.S. Health Care system:

  • 17% of GDP
  • Tens of millions of uninsured and under-insured Americans
  • Hundreds of thousands of medical-cost-induced bankruptcies every year.
  • A terrified populace.
  • Businesses and an economy burdened by health insurance costs and concerns
  • Wealthy hospital and insurance company executives.
  • A thriving yacht industry (for those wealthy executives).

Evil Evil Socialized Medicine:

  • 12% or less of GDP
  • 100% full coverage
  • Zero medical cost induced bankruptcies
  • A contented populace that isn't terrified by health care cost issues.
  • Businesses and an economy unburdened by health insurance costs and concerns.
  • Far fewer wealthy hospital and insurance company executives (oh, the horror!)
  • An emaciated yacht industry (oh the horror!)

Holy propaganda Batman!

So now it's not just single payer, you want full government takeover of medicine in the US?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
They might be providing all sorts of other non-health care benefits. But their health care spending is 12% of GDP or less depending on the country.

"Terrified populace" refers to the prospect of losing your job and thus your health insurance.

That is the Republicans' master stroke. In the Democrats act of trying to improve the health care system, they implemented the Republicans alternative to socialized medicine and now it looks like it was the Democrats idea.

But the Democrats never supported a war in Iraq prior to Bush's coming onto the scene and suggesting. It's not as though the Democrats advocated an Iraqi invasion for years and that Bush just adopted the idea as a compromise when he really wanted to nuke them.

The partisan hackery is painful!
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
But the Democrats never supported a war in Iraq prior to Bush's coming onto the scene and suggesting. It's not as though the Democrats advocated an Iraqi invasion for years and that Bush just adopted the idea as a compromise when he really wanted to nuke them.

So you cherry pick one sentence out of the whole paragraph and did not or rather could not answer the rest? Seriously?

Let rewind => some Democrats did vote for Iraq war, yet it was solely on Bush and Republicans.

Obamacare = voted and passed on both houses of Congress entirely by Democrats, yet it is NOW becomes Republicans' idea/plan (per you)?

Still no reply to my other questions/statements from the previous post (#110)? What is the matter?
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
Link
Boehner tries to sign up for 'Obamacare,'
For something that should take 10-15 minutes and be clean .....
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
Holy propaganda Batman!

So now it's not just single payer, you want full government takeover of medicine in the US?

I've known the problem is price gouging, insurance or no insurance so I was looking into how the different systems worked on a very surface level and it seems like healthcare is a bit like a power monopoly. You need the government to do the negotiating on your behalf to get a fair price.

Medicare hands down gets better prices than private insurance companies do. There is alot of friction between insurance companies settling with hospitals AFAIK (suing back and forth lawyer fees, etc). It seems like its local monopolies, the only XYZ specialty for miles is going to run you $100,000's no matter the actual cost of the procedure and surgeon so it varies by region.

Doctors drop medicare because of the lower payments, but by taking medicare are guaranteed a steady stream of patients. Hospitals are required by law to treat anyone entering the ER and offset the price by gouging on other services and in the end who knows who is really making out. The government should probably negotiate the price on the peoples behalf honestly, medicare style.

If everyone entering the ER were covered it would remove the need to gouge in the first place.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
I've known the problem is price gouging, insurance or no insurance so I was looking into how the different systems worked on a very surface level and it seems like healthcare is a bit like a power monopoly. You need the government to do the negotiating on your behalf to get a fair price.

Medicare hands down gets better prices than private insurance companies do. There is alot of friction between insurance companies settling with hospitals AFAIK (suing back and forth lawyer fees, etc). It seems like its local monopolies, the only XYZ specialty for miles is going to run you $100,000's no matter the actual cost of the procedure and surgeon so it varies by region.

Doctors drop medicare because of the lower payments, but by taking medicare are guaranteed a steady stream of patients. Hospitals are required by law to treat anyone entering the ER and offset the price by gouging on other services and in the end who knows who is really making out. The government should probably negotiate the price on the peoples behalf honestly, medicare style.

If everyone entering the ER were covered it would remove the need to gouge in the first place.

You clearly don't know how Medicare works. They do NOT get better prices simply because it's the government. They tell practitioners how much they'll reimburse them for any given procedure, even if it means the person providing the care loses money.

If you go to the grocery store and tell the cashier you're taking $100 worth of food that cost the grocery store $75, but you're only paying $50, does that mean you made food cheaper? No, it means you fucked over the store, and they're going to have charge the next guy twice as much.

The idea of Medicare for all being a better system is fueled by rainbows and unicorn shit. Medicare only work because the rest of us get screwed over.
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
The doctors, nurses, XRay techs, hospital janitors, etc. who are performing the actual work of providing health care are not the problem. The problem is all of the people who earn an income from the health care industry who do not contribute to actually providing health care.

^this.Insurance companies,lobbyists,congressmen,malpractice lawyers.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
^this.Insurance companies,lobbyists,congressmen,malpractice lawyers.

And so you believe that government run health care has nobody involved who isn't directly involved with providing care? Because government work is always so efficient and there's no expensive bureaucracy?
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
And so you believe that government run health care has nobody involved who isn't directly involved with providing care? Because government work is always so efficient and there's no expensive bureaucracy?

No;I believe that government has twice as many people not directly involved in addition to the aforementioned leeches who do nothing except exacerbate the problem.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
I never said they voted for it. However, it is their plan. They only opposed it because the Democrats were supporting it.

This is such progressive liberal bullshit. It was one of many plans drawn up by think tanks a quarter of a century ago. It was not the supported plan that Republicans have been pushing, and to keep saying so just shows how intellectually dishonest progressives are, and what lengths they will go to, to deflect from their beloved leaders failure.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,323
15,121
136
This is such progressive liberal bullshit. It was one of many plans drawn up by think tanks a quarter of a century ago. It was not the supported plan that Republicans have been pushing, and to keep saying so just shows how intellectually dishonest progressives are, and what lengths they will go to, to deflect from their beloved leaders failure.

You are right, it's not the plan republicans were pushing but that's because they weren't pushing for a particular plan nor are they now. Status quo is their game plan. Do you remember how great the old system was? Do you remember how costs were kept in check? Do you remember how almost everyone had coverage and how the number of people without insurance was shrinking? Or perhaps you remember how no one was denied coverage because of pre existing conditions or dropped off their plans because of coverage caps.

And if you do remember any of that then I'd suggest getting your head checked.

So yeah! You are right but that doesn't make things any better.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Almost 80 million people with employer health plans could find their coverage canceled because they are not compliant with ObamaCare, several experts predicted.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ion-predicted-tens-millions-would-lose-plans/

This is what happens when progressives are in charge...so "brilliant", so articulate, so arrogant...yet so completely oblivious to their abject stupidity. The only "up side" here is that America will remember you and what you did for a long, long time.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,834
1,485
126
I cant believe there is no outcry about moving next year's open enrollment dates until after next year's elections...

The train wreck keeps getting worse (30% of the ACA system is still not even built yet, up to 80 million will lose their employer coverage next year because these plans are not ACA compliant, etc) and these politicians will not be held accountable at election time..

What a fucking crock of shit....
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
You are right, it's not the plan republicans were pushing but that's because they weren't pushing for a particular plan nor are they now. Status quo is their game plan. Do you remember how great the old system was? Do you remember how costs were kept in check? Do you remember how almost everyone had coverage and how the number of people without insurance was shrinking? Or perhaps you remember how no one was denied coverage because of pre existing conditions or dropped off their plans because of coverage caps.

And if you do remember any of that then I'd suggest getting your head checked.

So yeah! You are right but that doesn't make things any better.

Aren't you the one who complains of everyone else "You're just rattling off the list of talking points!"

Guess what!

That's all you ever do too - rattle off the same list of highlights time and time and time and time and time again.

Have fun with your hypocrisy.

Nothing that you list off makes health care cheaper, more efficient, or in greater supply. I'm not saying anything about any Republican plan, I'm just saying the plan I would have pursued if I were the industry expert would be one to reduce overall costs, rather than the cost shifting plan the Democrats created. You cannot explain how those items makes health care services more affordable and in greater abundance. We live in times of a finite amount of health care services available. Care provided to one person means care taken away from another person. There is a reason why revenues taken in by Obamacare span a greater number of years than the services provided out.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |