#OccupyWallstreet

Page 111 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Pot meet keetle.
Fluff off. You are truly an imbecile. I'd challenge you to show how what I said was inaccurate, but that would require you to actually use your purportedly open mind. You would have to expose it to facts that contradict your blind faith in the nutter propaganda you so eagerly and uncritically guzzle. You would have to show us you're capable of being more than a parrot ... and we all know that won't happen.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Thank you. While I am certainly opinionated about many things, I always try to be sure I have my facts straight. (And when I make a mistake, I will acknowledge and correct it.) I apologize for suggesting you are at all similar to Spidey. You show a level of character Spidey could never imagine.

Again, cheers.

<3

I like people who own up to their mistakes.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Fluff off. You are truly an imbecile. I'd challenge you to show how what I said was inaccurate, but that would require you to actually use your purportedly open mind. You would have to expose it to facts that contradict your blind faith in the nutter propaganda you so eagerly and uncritically guzzle. You would have to show us you're capable of being more than a parrot ... and we all know that won't happen.



you just keep proving my point. Calling anyone that disagrees with you a parrot, over and over and over again.,

Geuss what that makes you? A Parrot.

You just repeat the same tired non agrument deflections over and over again.


Person A brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person B brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person C brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person D brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

-----------------

I know its hard to argue for or against something without actually having to think about the issue. So what do you do? Just label everyone you disagree with a nutter parrot.

And geuss what, when you get called out on it, what do you do? Call them a nutter parrot.

Wow amazing debate skill.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Pressed by officialdom, Occupy Denver elects their leader-

http://gawker.com/5857715/

Social dominance oriented righties will fail to appreciate it, obviously...

No, it just renforces the image of the OWS movement. A bunch of kids, and/or anarchorists that cannot stand order/leaders/bosses.


You will now dismiss that statement saying that only a percentage of OWS is those things. And you would be right. But when the group acts like kids, how can they expect to be treated like adults?
 
Last edited:

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
you just keep proving my point. Calling anyone that disagrees with you a parrot, over and over and over again.,

Geuss what that makes you? A Parrot.

You just repeat the same tired non agrument deflections over and over again.


Person A brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person B brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person C brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

Person D brings up a point

Bowfingers respponse "Your are a nutter parrot"

-----------------

I know its hard to argue for or against something without actually having to think about the issue. So what do you do? Just label everyone you disagree with a nutter parrot.

And geuss what, when you get called out on it, what do you do? Call them a nutter parrot.

Wow amazing debate skill.
ROFL! Po' baby, did I hurt your feelings? If you don't like being called a parrot, don't act like one.

It's hilarious that you -- as usual -- ignored everything I wrote except the one sentence where I point out you're a parrot. I challenged you to use your fabulous "open" mind. You ran away yet again, making no effort whatsoever to show where or how I was wrong (in this case about ACORN). Instead -- as usual -- you try to change the subject. I offer facts and reason. You offer nothing but lame duhversions.

I'll tell you what. Since you are so self conscious about being a parrot, let me offer another word for you. Buffoon. You have quickly established yourself as the P&N buffoon. You flop around spouting canned talking points while bragging about your "open" mind. You fail to respond to challenges or consider evidence contradicting you, usually spouting tripe like your comments above. You use such noise to try to distract us from the fact you "debate" like an ADD-afflicted three year old. You fail. You only fool yourself.

Now I'm sure that's way too many words for you, so here's the bottom line. You can either offer specific, objective, accurate evidence that my claims about ACORN were wrong ... or you can continue to be the P&N buffoon. My bet is you'll chose door #2 and refuse to respond on topic.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
ROFL! Po' baby, did I hurt your feelings? If you don't like being called a parrot, don't act like one.

It's hilarious that you -- as usual -- ignored everything I wrote except the one sentence where I point out you're a parrot. I challenged you to use your fabulous "open" mind. You ran away yet again, making no effort whatsoever to show where or how I was wrong (in this case about ACORN). Instead -- as usual -- you try to change the subject. I offer facts and reason. You offer nothing but lame duhversions.

I'll tell you what. Since you are so self conscious about being a parrot, let me offer another word for you. Buffoon. You have quickly established yourself as the P&N buffoon. You flop around spouting canned talking points while bragging about your "open" mind. You fail to respond to challenges or consider evidence contradicting you, usually spouting tripe like your comments above. You use such noise to try to distract us from the fact you "debate" like an ADD-afflicted three year old. You fail. You only fool yourself.

Now I'm sure that's way too many words for you, so here's the bottom line. You can either offer specific, objective, accurate evidence that my claims about ACORN were wrong ... or you can continue to be the P&N buffoon. My bet is you'll chose door #2 and refuse to respond on topic.


Again, this is all you do. Over and over again. Call people names.

come back when your no longer a robot.

PS

Calling someone a 'parrot' or 'nutter' is neither fact, nor reason.
 
Last edited:

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
So they get a shot to talk to someone in charge, to start making some meaningful inroads, and they elect a dog to do it?

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

They also want to be treated seriously. And claim to repersent the 99%. how many of the 99% will see these people as a joke now?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Again, this is all you do. Over and over again. Call people names.

come back when your no longer a robot.

PS

Calling someone a 'parrot' or 'nutter' is neither fact, nor reason.
I called it. Run, Mickey, run. You prove yet again your fabulously "open" mind is incapable of refuting anything.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
I called it. Run, Mickey, run. You prove yet again your fabulously "open" mind is incapable of refuting anything.

What do I have to prove?

anyone can do a search on you in this thread and see most of your posts contain an insult instead of an argument.

Why do you want me to run? Are you afraid someone is calling you out?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
What do I have to prove?

anyone can do a search on you in this thread and see most of your posts contain an insult instead of an argument.

Why do you want me to run? Are you afraid someone is calling you out?

Bowfinger said:
Now I'm sure that's way too many words for you, so here's the bottom line. You can either offer specific, objective, accurate evidence that my claims about ACORN were wrong ... or you can continue to be the P&N buffoon. My bet is you'll chose door #2 and refuse to respond on topic.

That's just on this page. If you like I can go back through the thread and bump many other examples of your fabulous "open" mind running away when challenged to support your BS (including several challenges to provide any examples of you showing an open mind).

I'm betting on door #2 again.
 

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
So, who was wrong?

The vandals that damaged the WF office, or the organization that deposited money into it....?

Was there any statement posted to the evils of WF in particular? Or was the vandalism akin to the news van being overturned at Penn State over the LIFE THREATENING firing of a head football coach...
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
That's just on this page. If you like I can go back through the thread and bump many other examples of your fabulous "open" mind running away when challenged to support your BS (including several challenges to provide any examples of you showing an open mind).

I'm betting on door #2 again.

If you learned to read. I never addressed your Acorn point.

I was just pointed out that you called someone else a 'parrot'. When you are doing nothing but carrying water for OWS.

From that point on, you did nothing but support my statement.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Pressed by officialdom, Occupy Denver elects their leader-

http://gawker.com/5857715/

Social dominance oriented righties will fail to appreciate it, obviously...
That doesn't surprise me -- they've all been pooping in the parks and on the sidewalks for months!

That said, it's extremely difficult to take them seriously when they do something so ridiculous. I'm sorry, but the dog idea was a mistake...
 

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
If you learned to read. I never addressed your Acorn point.

I was just pointed out that you called someone else a 'parrot'. When you are doing nothing but carrying water for OWS.

From that point on, you did nothing but support my statement.

Mike, what he is getting at is simple.

Offer more than links and soundbites that resemble exactly what Fox + Friends say on their morning show.

Others here may share your feelings, but some actually go further to flesh out the bones of a deliberately attention getting shock statement.

The ACORN thing was in challenge to comments you and other put forth about them. Maybe not directly, but he is asking for a more direct response.

It is like dealing with a screaming 3 year old. You have to get them to point to what hurts before you can do anything about it. Putting an ice pack on their head will not help their bruised knee, and giving them an ice pop for every problem may make them happy, but it still does not solve the root cause of the distress.....


Anywhoo, go back to squabbling if you want. Just know that you will get nothing but your internet rocks off by doing so.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Mike, what he is getting at is simple.

Offer more than links and soundbites that resemble exactly what Fox + Friends say on their morning show.

Others here may share your feelings, but some actually go further to flesh out the bones of a deliberately attention getting shock statement.

The ACORN thing was in challenge to comments you and other put forth about them. Maybe not directly, but he is asking for a more direct response.

It is like dealing with a screaming 3 year old. You have to get them to point to what hurts before you can do anything about it. Putting an ice pack on their head will not help their bruised knee, and giving them an ice pop for every problem may make them happy, but it still does not solve the root cause of the distress.....


Anywhoo, go back to squabbling if you want. Just know that you will get nothing but your internet rocks off by doing so.

Why dont you call him out for his rants and raves? Oh thats right, he supports your side, therefor he gets a pass.
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
The ironing, it's delicious.

Yeah they put the money into a big wall street bank account so they can quickly bail out arrested protesters? So that $20k donation was really just money given to the police chief's and police commissioner's pension funds.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |