HendrixFan
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2001
- 4,646
- 0
- 71
Unlike many on the right, I have no problem being more protectionist for U.S. industry, some tariffs are the only way to somewhat level the field. I'm fair trade more than free trade.
All things in moderation. I think tariffs are a good idea because trade shouldn't be one sided, if it is the appropriate term is looting. Since trade is inevitable, we have to be aggressive about positioning ourselves strongly in that area. We have certainly failed that.
I agree with you about preventive care being a priority.
Of all the advantages of countries that have UHC, I would bet that this is the single most important part of them being able to beat us out on costs. Americans are in terrible shape and the collective health has to suffer. Which industry has the desire or clout to lobby head to head with the food (not good food either) and healthcare industry? Any governmental structure that attempts to steer the country towards being healthy will be submarined.
We seem to agree less on debt, i've always felt that if you sign the papers, give your word, that you need to pay it off, you knew what the terms were when you signed up. Thanks again for the reasoned response.
No problem. I don't have a problem with holding people accountable for their debts, bankruptcy and the seven years of pain excluded. It is just that a society built around creating debt and profiting off of debt needs to push people towards debt. This runs counter to a strong middle class as debt reduces their purchasing power. Hold people accountable but don't make it so "easy" to get into debt. Government backing of student loans encourages the banks to encourage institutions to encourage kids to go to college, but not for the education. They just want them to sign up for tens of thousands in loans to be paid off over twenty to thirty years. Debt slavery for all.
Of course that leads into the consumption society which is bad for the middle class but who wants to go there?