gooooliegee! no need to be mean to me. I was trying to be helpful in pointing out that your jealousy isn't so becoming.
hell hath no fury..... sheesh!
I'm not jealous, just pointing out the facts. Maybe you're the one that's jealous seeing that you brought it up.
ROFLMAO! What a cowardly sack you are. These are your exact words child:
"You must have a permit to assemble, just like you need a permit to bear most types of arms. No right is violated if the assembly is illegal."I'm not in the least surprised you lack the integrity to acknowledge your exact words and the maturity to admit you were wrong ... yet again. Here's a hint. That big 'L' on your forehead does NOT mean you're "1337".
"Yes, but since they were illegally assembling, none of what you just claimed is valid."
Here's another hint. Not only are such comments exceptionally childish and lame, they may also get you vacationed. I'm not a mod and won't presume to speak for them, but those sorts of comments have provoked harsh responses in the past. If you are truly incapable of anything even marginally intelligent, perhaps it would be better for you just crawl back under your bridge until you regain your composure.
My $0.02.
gooooliegee! no need to be mean to me. I was trying to be helpful in pointing out that your jealousy isn't so becoming.
hell hath no fury..... sheesh!
Ahhh poor baby thinks that was an attack, go cry to your Mommy.
More Hazmat material from the P&N loon. You can fit what you "know" about "liberals" in the head of a pin (which is no coincidence, since you did). One doesn't have to be a liberal to develop a fairly solid definition of ethics, i.e., right and wrong. If it hurts other people, it's wrong. Certainly there's a bit of grey in that, but plundering the economy for personal gain falls clearly on the side of wrong.Right, that's my point. In the mind of a liberal, the liberal gets to decide what is ethical or not. To the liberal, any way to spin it as "greed" is unethical and therefore the liberal should take that ill gotten gains. (this has also been demanded by OWS protesters, it is afterall the foundation of communism and what the liberal feels).
Oh, I know exactly what you believe and how you feel. I have completely and totally digested the mind of the liberal. And this country IS going to stop it. Your post reaks of exactly what the liberal thinks - you wish to impose your will on others and force them to live how you think they should. Who the hell are you to tell somebody what's most important? This is America.
And go fuck yourself, I bet I give more to charity than you pay in taxes.
lashing out like this simply makes everyone around you pick up their toys and go home.
lashing out like this simply makes everyone around you pick up their toys and go home.
Umm. Hate to burst your bubble, sweetie, but I frequently use such terms when addressing children ... especially amusingly ignorant children.Obviously you have some feelings for cyberage or you wouldn't use these terms of endearment when addressing him.
Umm. Hate to burst your bubble, sweetie, but I frequently use such terms when addressing children ... especially amusingly ignorant children.
More Hazmat material from the P&N loon. You can fit what you "know" about "liberals" in the head of a pin (which is no coincidence, since you did). One doesn't have to be a liberal to develop a fairly solid definition of ethics, i.e., right and wrong. If it hurts other people, it's wrong. Certainly there's a bit of grey in that, but plundering the economy for personal gain falls clearly on the side of wrong.
(For the record, despite all your chest thumping about how wonderful and successful you are -- or at least your "wife" is -- I suspect I paid more in taxes last year than you earned. It is in large part due to my personal success that I came to realize that a life focused on chasing dollars at all costs is a life wasted. You're not mature enough to understand this, I think, but someday you will ... and it may well be too late.
Not all, but many. Of course most also contain factual content, something yours generally lack. I offer content to address the debate and insults to express my disdain for people who deny reality and rely on dishonest arguments.LOL! Every post of your contains some kind of personal insult which is one way to know you've been defeated. All you've got are insults when met with the overwhelming evidence of fact and reality.
I am quite aware that business contains both winners (e.g., me) and losers (e.g., you). That has nothing to do with right and wrong. What you simply cannot comprehend is that it is quite possible to win "fairly", without resorting to unethical actions that hurt your customers, competitors, or taxpayers. For you to deny this, to contend that the only way to succeed is hurting other people, marks you as a sociopath who has no place in civilized society.right, and you get to decide what hurt is. You wish for social and economic "justice". Here's a fact, and if you were successful you'd know that there are winners and losers in all aspects of business. It's the beauty of capitalism and why it mates up so well with basic human instinct which the liberal wants to ignore or destroy - all in the name of "justice".
I told you I know how the liberal thinks.
ROFLMAO! What a cowardly sack you are. These are your exact words child:The claim was that you can assemble simply because the constitution says so. This is not true.
Here's another hint. Not only are such comments exceptionally childish and lame, they may also get you vacationed. I'm not a mod and won't presume to speak for them, but those sorts of comments have provoked harsh responses in the past. If you are truly incapable of anything even marginally intelligent, perhaps it would be better for you just crawl back under your bridge until you regain your composure.I know, I know, you like to take things out of context so you can ask me for ghey sechs again. You can just ask, no need to play dumb to do it.
Looks like a win-win deal to me.
I'm not impaired by your simple-minded black and white mindset. The real world is virtually never so clean.Bowfinger. If I buy widgets for a dollar and sell them for 300 is the ethical?
Just yes or no.
You'll all note cybrsage is desperately trying to change the subject from this, in response to one of his latest lies:
ROFLMAO! What a cowardly sack you are. These are your exact words child:
"You must have a permit to assemble, just like you need a permit to bear most types of arms. No right is violated if the assembly is illegal."
"Yes, but since they were illegally assembling, none of what you just claimed is valid."
I'm not in the least surprised you lack the integrity to acknowledge your exact words and the maturity to admit you were wrong
Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/19/4066159/10-occupy-protesters-arrested.html#ixzz1exQvf7z8Karen Nikos, a UC Davis spokeswoman, said the campers were given written warning to remove the tents by 3 p.m. or police would remove them. She said many of the campers did take down their tents before police arrived.
Nikos said students who were arrested are accused of failure to disperse and lodging without permission of the owner, both misdemeanors.
... yet again. Here's a hint. That big 'L' on your forehead does NOT mean you're "1337".
He's also ignoring that consumer debt is going way down and saving going way up in the obama economy.
Bullshit. Your question was "who profits?", not "who profits the most?"
Any/every lost sale negatively impacts every link in the chain -- even moreso the employees at the lowest levels... you know, the ones you supposedly hope to lift up.
This is Econ 101 sh1t.
Please explain to me how impeding sales solves ANY of that problem without simultaneously damaging those who you are claiming to help.
He's also ignoring that consumer debt is going way down and saving going way up in the obama economy.
I never said "the only ones." In fact, nobody ever said that, and it flies in the face of my entire point.My post was in response specifically to the notion that the only ones who could be hurt by a protest would be the lower rung of workers.
Here's your last lesson: every normal employee who receives a simple wage in the retail cycle is actually "profiting;" and, in a normal market, their continued livelihood is dependent on the continued success (read: sales) of their employers.
Failures (ie. lost sales) adversely affect every employee who is a part of the cycle -- particularly those who are at/near the bottom.