Do you think endlessly repeating your unsupported assertions magically improves your position? It doesn't. It just shows you either don't have a leg to stand on or don't know how to form a factual, cogent argument. If you want to persuade those outside the wing-nut echo chamber, you need to back your claims by citing (i.e., linking) credible, objective sources for them. That's not just waving your hands and saying the NYT had an article. It's providing actual links.
And let's be crystal clear here. Your claim is that Lasn controls OWS. I believe that claim is demonstrably false, based in part one of the articles you linked some time ago. Lasn inspired it and provides ideas, yes, a point I've never denied. Control? No.
So, the ball's in your court, sport. You can continue spouting childish personal attacks and repeating your same tired, unsupported allegations, or you can get off your butt, actually move past your emotional beliefs, and seek real, credible evidence supporting -- or refuting -- your views. So far all you're doing is making noise.