#OccupyWallstreet

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,470
50,536
136
I live 5 blocks from Wall St. I had no idea this happened nor anything was slightly different here.

No one gave a shit. These Wallstreet CEOs probably mosquito farted at this cute 'protest'.

Nothing happened. They're still corrupt and rich as fuck. Not a single fuck was given that day.

It has nothing to do with what the CEOs of the banks think. Literally zero.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,470
50,536
136
What difference did this useless 'protest' make?

Already covered that. Protests exist to gain people's attention, obviously since we're talking about it, it was in the NYT, the WSJ, etc, etc, this has worked.

Nobody gives a shit about what the CEOs think, they would be against financial regulations no matter what.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Those idiots are kind of funny with these protests, trying to equate what they're doing to those literally risking their lives when protesting evil regimes elsewhere. Arrest them all, let them contemplate the meaning of life in jail for a few days.

Your retarded attitude is why this country is fucked. Is it any wonder that there are countries that have a functioning government OUTSIDE of the US? The reason why other countries have good governance is because their governments are afraid of it's population and works to protect it's citizens, while we have a fucking retarded segment of the population (you are part of this) that fights against those that want to change the system. Keep looking down on those who protest the corrupt.
 

emilyek

Senior member
Mar 1, 2005
511
0
0
There should have been an occupation of Wall Street in 2008, with torches and pitchforks; and Lloyd Blankfein-- and others-- should have been strung up by their testicles, flogged and disemboweled.

Protests today? They already stole the trillions that actual laboring people spent a lifetime saving; they already got away with it. The protests are three years too late.
 

Mr. Lennon

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
3,492
1
81
Care to explain that?

I think we royally fucked ourselves into believing a complex system full of agent issues and informational asymmetries will work just fine without regulation. Ayn Rand-esque dogma is largely based on economic theory developed around Smith's Wealth of Nations. That doesn't have much to do with Wall Street though.

Looks like others already answered the question.

Feel free to take the men who bailed them out, and throw them in jail. Republican, Democrat, you're correct. This isn't Left or Right, we were looted and it came directly from Congress and the Presidency with bipartisan support.

If you don't like what wall street has done, then feel free to support the Tea Party who oppose the bailouts in the first place.

LOL no thanks. I believe bailouts were a necessary evil anyways.

LOL @ those who wish to battle Wall Street.

You aren't even doing it on the right day. You schedule a MASSIVE protest on a weekday or something.

Most of these pukes just don't get it - Wall Street controls everything. They take and do whatever they want. For every 1 white collar crime that gets outted, there are 100 that go by undetected and unpunished.

The best way to let Wall Street collapse it let them run the mother fucker into the ground. Lift these regulations and let the rich piss away their money. Let see how well they can handle a crash and burn.

As much as I disagree with the actions of Wall Street; allowing them to crash and burn would have caused severe repercussions for our economy.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
There should have been an occupation of Wall Street in 2008, with torches and pitchforks; and Lloyd Blankfein-- and others-- should have been strung up by their testicles, flogged and disemboweled.

Protests today? They already stole the trillions that actual laboring people spent a lifetime saving; they already got away with it. The protests are three years too late.

What "trillions" were stolen?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
From Tim O'Reilly of O'Reilly Media (essentially the developer book publisher):

I just went down to check out the scene at the https://occupywallst.org/ rally. It was a bit of a disappointment, for a number of reasons. First, there were only a few hundred people there (one of the organizers told me they peaked out at around a thousand on the weekend). Second, the people who were there were the wrong people.

What do I mean by that? The attendees were mainly scruffily dressed young people, whose attire and approach was too easily dismissed by those in authority. The smirk on the face of the Fox News reporter who was interviewing various participants said it all. "These people are easy to dismiss."

I couldn't bear to see him goading these idealistic young people into making bombastic statements (the reporter is a tool of AIG was one comment I overheard), so I stepped over and asked if I could speak to him.

I told him that I run a company with about $100 million in revenue, and that it isn't just kids who think that Wall Street bankers got away with a crime. There are a set of people who constructed a set of financial products with intent to defraud. They took our country to the brink of ruin, then got off scott free, even with multi-million dollar bonuses. I'll be interested to see if Fox runs my comments anywhere.

It seems so odd to me that the Tea Party isn't out in force at this protest. It seems so odd that government largesse aimed at rich corporations seems to be OK with them, while government largesse aimed at the disadvantaged ought to be cut. I would have loved to see blue collar Americans out in force at this protest, not just college students.

(Personally, I'm all for a leaner approach to government that I've described with the geeky vision of "Government as a Platform." Spend strategically in order to catalyze society to do what needs to be done. Unfortunately, in this case that wasn't done.)

I highly recommend Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone reporting on the financial crisis of 2008 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405 , as well as these recent pieces: http://www.financialsense.com/finan...-nobody-went-to-jail-during-the-credit-crisis and http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/09/obamas_economic_quagmire_frank.html They should make your blood boil.

It's not the American Spring yet, but it ought to be.
 

the DRIZZLE

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2007
2,956
1
81
From Tim O'Reilly of O'Reilly Media (essentially the developer book publisher):

One of the catalysts for the tea party was the bank bailouts. Many tea partiers oppose that kind of crony capitalism and have been outspoken about. Just because they didn't show up at the lefty's protest doesn't mean they haven't spoken out in other venues.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Last edited:

the DRIZZLE

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2007
2,956
1
81
Not all that surprising
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=CA&last=o'reilly&first=tim

Unemployment rate for people with college degrees is ~4%, that's probably why the only people that showed up were "mainly scruffily dressed young people, whose attire and approach was too easily dismissed by those in authority." The rest of the people were working.

I'm skeptical of the that number. The BLS says it's 4.3% seasonally adjusted, but they only count people over 25. I know a ton of recent college grads either not working or working retail/waiting tables.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
I'm skeptical of the that number. The BLS says it's 4.3% seasonally adjusted, but they only count people over 25. I know a ton of recent college grads either not working or working retail/waiting tables.

Some 30% of the country has a college degree or better, I would be surprised if the "new grads" segment would have any impact on the data. There just aren't many of them compared to 1/3 of the country.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Already covered that. Protests exist to gain people's attention, obviously since we're talking about it, it was in the NYT, the WSJ, etc, etc, this has worked.

Nobody gives a shit about what the CEOs think, they would be against financial regulations no matter what.

Sorry to break it to you, but almost all Wall Street firms are part of a self-regulating organization (FINRA) which writes their own regulation. Sure, there is some additional top-down regulation from the SEC, but the vast majority of it is from the street itself. And to be honest, half the time when the SEC does issue regulations or guidance, it's so ham-fisted that it does more harm than good.

And for those saying that sub-prime was the cause of the financial crisis, that's more like a symptom; it's much more accurate to say that FASB rule 157 was the bigger culprit. Wall Street had market meltdowns before and the bursting of the housing bubble was a smaller deal for the Street than the dot-com meltdown. People lost money in the dot-com blowup but the system didn't collapse. On the other hand, combine the pop of the housing bubble with idiotic mark to market rules that simply don't function in a market with no buyers, and you have the 2007-2009 financial meltdown happen.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
One of the catalysts for the tea party was the bank bailouts. Many tea partiers oppose that kind of crony capitalism and have been outspoken about. Just because they didn't show up at the lefty's protest doesn't mean they haven't spoken out in other venues.

Actually this is complete bullshit. The Tea Party was a very small movement based around Ron Paul during the Bush years that everyone ignored, but it wasn't until Rick Santelli's rant that they really became the bigger faux small government fox news astroturf organization that it is today. Rick Santelli's rant was based on Obama's plan to refinance homeowner mortgages (it was a 75 billion dollar bill, IIRC), which was a fucking idiotic thing to rally around because it was helping homeowners and it was a very small program dollar wise compared to the actual bank bailouts. If anything, it shows how much full of shit the modern day tea party is because they didn't show this type of anger and organization when the banks were initially bailed out. The modern day tea party was NOT because of the bank bailouts. I think only the Ron Paul version of the tea party (which was insignificant) can really claim to have been initially exist because of the bank bailouts.
 
Last edited:

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Already covered that. Protests exist to gain people's attention, obviously since we're talking about it, it was in the NYT, the WSJ, etc, etc, this has worked.

Hahaha, "hey look at those morons over there with their little teen angst protest. Ok, that was funny, now lets go on with our day.". In other words, it was completely useless.
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,218
2
76
I'm skeptical of the that number. The BLS says it's 4.3% seasonally adjusted, but they only count people over 25. I know a ton of recent college grads either not working or working retail/waiting tables.

not to mention unemployment numbers are pretty crappy anyways, underemployment is much more telling of the issue at hand
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
lols what a joke. i'm so sick of intellectual communist wannabes talking about the worker and labourers like they have any fucking clue. like JSt0rm said to me in another thread "we know you're a grunt, we wouldn't want someone like you leading the country" then stop saying you know wtf labour does or doesn't do or where the workers are. There are hardly any real workers left in the States. We have citizens working in food service or the service industry and illegals working in our labor markets, anyone without a job is on unemployment sucking at the teet.
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
One of the catalysts for the tea party was the bank bailouts. Many tea partiers oppose that kind of crony capitalism and have been outspoken about. Just because they didn't show up at the lefty's protest doesn't mean they haven't spoken out in other venues.

Wouldn't it be amazing though if they came out and supported some lefties on something they agreed with them on.

Of course that will never happen. No matter how much the two sides agree with one another they would never work together on any issue, because they're on different teams.
It's even happening in this thread. Look at the reactions from the Right. If the TEA Party had a protest in Manhattan the Right would be falling all over themselves to commend them for their patriotism and for actually doing something and the Left would probably be making fun of them for being Unemployment and Social Security recipients with nothing better to do.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
This whole escapade summarized:
That is priceless! Thanks!

Wouldn't it be amazing though if they came out and supported some lefties on something they agreed with them on.

Of course that will never happen. No matter how much the two sides agree with one another they would never work together on any issue, because they're on different teams.
It's even happening in this thread. Look at the reactions from the Right. If the TEA Party had a protest in Manhattan the Right would be falling all over themselves to commend them for their patriotism and for actually doing something and the Left would probably be making fun of them for being Unemployment and Social Security recipients with nothing better to do.
Amazing, but unlikely. The Republicans are too far left for the Tea Party; on what could they and lefties ever agree? Your point is valid though; we all make allowances for those with whom we fundamentally agree and are automatically suspicious of those with whom we fundamentally disagree. Tell me you're a progressive and I'll automatically be suspicious of any position you take.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Theb is right, everyone just cares about their team, not themselves. It's lols. Turning this place into North Korea one moron at a time.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |