Dude, most people are still on 1080p and 1440p.
Some might even chase 1440p 120/144Hz, not 4K 60Hz.
Glad that the waves of Gameworks games thinned. Now it's the GamingEvolved wave, can't wait for that.
Dude, most people are still on 1080p and 1440p.So the new go to metric is lower resolution. It gets more and more ridiculous how far people will reach to try and show nVidia in a better light.
Glad that the waves of Gameworks games thinned. Now it's the GamingEvolved wave, can't wait for that.15.7 fixes the 1080/1440p issue, lots of people on forums & reddit are seeing massive gains.
Also a few of the upcoming games for DX12 is sponsored by AMD, Battlefront, Deus Ex, Hitman, all big AAA titles.. things are looking up for AMD! Now all they need is to release vcore modding tools.
AMD doesn't really maintain these tools AFAIK.15.7 fixes the 1080/1440p issue, lots of people on forums & reddit are seeing massive gains.
Also a few of the upcoming games for DX12 is sponsored by AMD*, Battlefront, Deus Ex, Hitman, all big AAA titles.. things are looking up for AMD! Now all they need is to release vcore modding tools.
* Seriously if AMD wanted to neuter Kepler/Maxwell with DX12, they'll just have games use more asynchronous compute features (remember the E3 event with devs showcasing compute usage in DX12 games, basically "free performance on GCN!"). Tonga, Hawaii, Fiji all have 8 Compute ACE that can handle those tasks with much more throughput than NV's current uarch (Maxwell 2 IIRC is limited to 64 compute OR 1 rendering + 1 compute, Kepler would just facepalm and weep in a corner).
Dude, most people are still on 1080p and 1440p.
AMD doesn't really maintain these tools AFAIK.
4% 1920x1080Btw, bang on ~5%, heck its even less than that at the same clocks. hehe
Fury vs Fury X on same clock
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-07/...itt_r9_fury_x_gegen_fury_bei_identischem_takt
Dude, most people are still on 1080p and 1440p.
Some might even chase 1440p 120/144Hz, not 4K 60Hz.
AMD is trying to fail hard, they launch Fury X and now Fury Pro without their best drivers, 15.7... these reviews still using 15.15 branch.
Still, basically Fury 5% less than Fury X at the same clocks is pretty damn good.
A few weeks ago when people were convinced 4GB wouldn't handle 4K it was important. And the real important metric was VRR below 40Hz. Now that we have 35Hz Freesync and working overdrive we're on 1080 @ 144Hz. See how the goalposts move?
As Fury's performance continues to improve no telling what will be next.
ps. 15.7 is making Fury X 5-20% faster from user reports. Definitely will change the competitive landscape.
I would say, yes, most people would enjoy playing games in their pimped out media room or at least on the big screen + audio system at times depending on the game.
You know, there's a simple question: why AMD could not have this driver (looks like a very good one) during Fury X launch (less than 3 weeks ago)?
Reception/perception of that card could be a bit different as I guess.
Hardocp used 15.7
It's like 290 and 290X all over again :thumbsup:Btw, bang on ~5%, heck its even less than that at the same clocks. hehe
AMD is trying to fail hard, they launch Fury X and now Fury Pro without their best drivers, 15.7... these reviews still using 15.15 branch.
Still, basically Fury 5% less than Fury X at the same clocks is pretty damn good.
There's a ton of variation based on sites. Some find it very close to Fury X but reading HWC, the gap is quite big, about 10%-12% at 1440p.
Price delta isn't much if there's such a gap, definitely X worth it for its water cooler. Grab a pair for a nice CF setup, would make more sense than two air cooler Fury Pros.
Don't care for that shill site. They finally included GW off but they test games and find the one scene where AMD performs worse and bench with that. Read their GTAV in-depth, they find the one area where Grass on Ultra tanks AMD performance and emphasize that.. what if users find areas where NV tanks? Hmm.
That would be incorrect. When we look for areas in games to use as our run-through we look for the areas that are the most gpu intensive. We use both NV and AMD GPUs, find this area, and use that. It is dependent on the game, not the GPU.