**Offical 2015-16 NFL Week 12 Thread - Where Refs Happen**

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

echo4747

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,978
156
106
One still left though I think...

The seasons are longer since then. Not to take anyway from that, I was a Fin fan myself att.

()

Your right ... Actually the Phins benefitted from teams not being able to challenge calls too. I saw a program that if replay existed then they would have lost at least two reg season games that year
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
No one really nailed him it looked, just stressed it juking more than anything it appeared to me. I'd have to see it again myself.

I really had just turned it back on myself.

glenn1 seems to have been watching it closer than I, I'd have to see it again.

I just saw one fast replay.
Maybe what's shown is different from carrier to carrier, but I saw it replayed at least twice - the first time, I thought, "season's over for him." I was amazed to see him hobble to his feet to get on the cart.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Holy Cow. Watching the sports news on a Buffalo station - they're showing a ton of bad calls in the Buffalo game - long passes for the Chiefs that were obviously incomplete on replay, but were called complete and weren't challenged. A super-important Bill's first down that was ruled incomplete, but a blind person could see that it was complete. The sportscasters seem to be blaming the Bills organization for not having a clue when they should be challenging calls.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
borderline calls.. sometimes they go your way other times they dont. I am sure borderline calls have helped the Pats win games too. You can say that about all teams

The hold on Lafelle in OT was blatant and obvious, it's what got Brady all pissed off, your calling EVERY possible call against one team then the other team commits an obvious hold preventing a receiver from catching a 1st down ball and it goes uncalled. Yea, the Pats have benefited from calls but what happened tonight was just egregious in the discrepancy of the officiating. I will still tip my cap to the Broncos, when a big play was needed they came up with one, I just wanted a level playing field and the Pats were denied that tonight.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
Local news in Boston says that Gronk was at his locker with no assistance but wasn't going to speak to reporters. Hopefully, just a sprain.

Refs were a joke.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Holy Cow. Watching the sports news on a Buffalo station - they're showing a ton of bad calls in the Buffalo game - long passes for the Chiefs that were obviously incomplete on replay, but were called complete and weren't challenged. A super-important Bill's first down that was ruled incomplete, but a blind person could see that it was complete. The sportscasters seem to be blaming the Bills organization for not having a clue when they should be challenging calls.

Part-time employees, that's what the NFL says is "good enough". That's like Delta hiring student pilots and saying their 'good enough".
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,751
3,068
121
Maybe what's shown is different from carrier to carrier, but I saw it replayed at least twice - the first time, I thought, "season's over for him." I was amazed to see him hobble to his feet to get on the cart.

I just saw the second replay probably as soon as I switched it over.

His leg was pretty extended the one time I saw it, if he got popped in the knee then, I'd imagine it is pretty major myself.
 

tynopik

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2004
5,245
500
126
I don't get it how Brees can throw 5 tds a few weeks ago and then lay a total goose egg like today.

Houston's defense is really, really good

Evan Silva ‏@evansilva 2h2 hours ago
#Texans D has allowed 3 TDs over its last 18 quarters.
#Eagles D has allowed 17 TDs over its last 18 quarters.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Part-time employees, that's what the NFL says is "good enough". That's like Delta hiring student pilots and saying their 'good enough".

Terrible analogy. Planes mostly fly themselves these days. Delta could get away with hiring student pilots. Refs, on the other hand, have to actually not be awful. It doesn't help they won't increase the number of them or use replay to verify every play. They can only see so much. But, that would make the game less interesting.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
borderline calls.. sometimes they go your way other times they dont. I am sure borderline calls have helped the Pats win games too. You can say that about all teams

Yes, the Patriots have benefitted from calls many, many times. The Colts have benefitted from calls too and have had stupid calls go against them - remember the time the refs called "No TD" on a run by Giovanni Bernard against the Colts (it was clearly NOT a touchdown so they were correct) and then reversed it on replay? Easily the worst call I've seen. The Eagles were gifted the game against the Colts last year from a bad call IIRC. Shit happens.

Regardless of all of that, I think the most interesting thing to come out of this game was that it erased any doubt that Manning is done in Denver IMO. Too bad that PFM has to go out this way.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,740
452
126
The frustrating thing about this game from Denver's side is how poor Thomas played. He had 12 or so targets with only 1 catch, and many of those catches were doable and he just didn't bother making an effort. Several times he just turned around and waited for the ball which made it quite easy to defend against. He didn't step into the catch to get away from the defender or anything. Conditions weren't great, but he looked like he wasn't even trying. He has a couple games a season where he just seems to have butterfingers, but this looked more like he didn't want to try.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,931
5,802
126
man oh man it is HILARIOUS to see pats fans after a loss, you would think that the apocalypse has landed. they are so spoiled lol.

i also didn't realize BUTCH1 was on the pats roster until this thread.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
Haven't been to this thread yet, so only assuming comments here, but I will go ahead and side with the Pats nuthuggers and whatever they must be complaining about re: calls last night.

They were pretty awful in that 4th quarter against the Pats.

However: they weren't the wrong calls, just "bad" calls. Plenty of calls that are generally not called or could go either way, just consistently called against the Pats in key situations--holding and offensive PI, especially.

The clock run down in normal time was quite bad.

That being said, none of it actually cost them the game; so that is good and give credit to the Pats for getting on and playing the game to win despite the bad officiating.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
145
106
www.neftastic.com
Yes, the Patriots have benefitted from calls many, many times.

Regardless of my hatred of the Pats, while watching the game last night (or before I turned it off in the 3rd qtr) I saw a stat line that I found rather interesting. The Pats are the #1 most penalized team when it comes to OPI calls. Gronk clocks in with a league leading 5 OPI flags himself.

The conspiracy theorist in me says those calls are done just for show though, and they happen when it doesn't matter whereas the rest of the league gets flagged on critical plays. Nah, it's just that everybody else plays sloppy football more often than not.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
The Pats had a timeout and they were also at the line ready to go when the excess time out was called(About 10 seconds had already run). So they would have just snapped the ball. By running the clock that way it actually cost the Pats an extra play.

That officiating was a terrible way to end a teams undefeated season.

And yet it did not cost them the game, in any way. They tied the game and went into OT, despite bad officiating, with every reasonable chance to win the game, having the ball first.

It is the same way that Bill Buckner has nothing to do with the Sox losing the World Series, or Bartman has nothing to do with the Cubs losing the NLCS.

Plenty of opportunities to win after such events. It is pointless to speculate on "what could have happened despite x" in any sporting event ever. Every next snap without the "bad call" could have simply been a turnover as well.

Might as well argue that the Pats technically lost the superbowl last year, right? Just replace bad coach with good coach (bad refs with good refs), and Lynch gets the ball, Seattle wins, Brady and his legions of nuthuggers go home crying, yet again.

But that's stupid.

Credit due to the Pats for surviving all the bad calls and losing on their own terms. I doubt any other team in the league would have put together that final drive to tie in regulation.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,931
5,802
126
And yet it did not cost them the game, in any way. They tied the game and went into OT, despite bad officiating, with every reasonable chance to win the game, having the ball first.

It is the same way that Bill Buckner has nothing to do with the Sox losing the World Series, or Bartman has nothing to do with the Cubs losing the NLCS.

Plenty of opportunities to win after such events. It is pointless to speculate on "what could have happened despite x" in any sporting event ever. Every next snap without the "bad call" could have simply been a turnover as well.

Might as well argue that the Pats technically lost the superbowl last year, right? Just replace bad coach with good coach (bad refs with good refs), and Lynch gets the ball, Seattle wins, Brady and his legions of nuthuggers go home crying, yet again.

But that's stupid.

Credit due to the Pats for surviving all the bad calls and losing on their own terms. I doubt any other team in the league would have put together that final drive to tie in regulation.

the pats fans will disagree with the bolded due to the missed hold that brady was crying about and making the hold signals to the ref on that first drive in OT.
 

echo4747

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,978
156
106
The hold on Lafelle in OT was blatant and obvious, it's what got Brady all pissed off, your calling EVERY possible call against one team then the other team commits an obvious hold preventing a receiver from catching a 1st down ball and it goes uncalled. Yea, the Pats have benefited from calls but what happened tonight was just egregious in the discrepancy of the officiating. I will still tip my cap to the Broncos, when a big play was needed they came up with one, I just wanted a level playing field and the Pats were denied that tonight.

Like I said It happens to all teams. you think its egregious because your a Pats fan. Whenever there are bad calls ...the fans of the team that got the bad call always say its egregious. Officiating is bad in many games every week. What I've noticed too is that we tend to overlook the beneficial calls during while watching the team we are rooting for. I'll bet you a hard core Denver fan could watch that game and point out non/bad calls that didn't go their way
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
man oh man it is HILARIOUS to see pats fans after a loss, you would think that the apocalypse has landed. they are so spoiled lol.

i also didn't realize BUTCH1 was on the pats roster until this thread.

I think the "apocalypse has landed" look is more for Gronk being hurt than a close loss in a single game. The later has a fairly minimal impact on their Super Bowl hopes, whereas the first would probably completely blow a hole below the waterline in them and scuttle their post-season. Brady is going to be throwing to himself at this rate with how many offensive players they're losing.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
145
106
www.neftastic.com
I think the "apocalypse has landed" look is more for Gronk being hurt than a close loss in a single game. The later has a fairly minimal impact on their Super Bowl hopes, whereas the first would probably completely blow a hole below the waterline in them and scuttle their post-season. Brady is going to be throwing to himself at this rate with how many offensive players they're losing.

Not just Gronk but pretty much every skill position player that NE has. They're down to their third string everybody now, and it's showing. Next man up can only take you so far when the next man up has a skill ceiling.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Good news for Pats fans. Still hoping for some epic playoff showdowns like NE-CIN presuming Andy Dalton doesn't do his typical playoffs disappearing act.

ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Patriots believe Rob Gronkowski (knee) "is going to be ok." We should know more after a Monday MRI, but all early reports have suggested Gronk's knee injury is minor. He still may miss Week 13, but at this point it would be surprising if Gronk sat out more than a couple weeks. Brandon LaFell should take on an even bigger role while Gronk is sidelined, and Scott Chandler will take over at tight end.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,931
5,802
126
I think the "apocalypse has landed" look is more for Gronk being hurt than a close loss in a single game. The later has a fairly minimal impact on their Super Bowl hopes, whereas the first would probably completely blow a hole below the waterline in them and scuttle their post-season. Brady is going to be throwing to himself at this rate with how many offensive players they're losing.

i'm not referring to this season only, i'm talking about whenever they lose in the past decade. it's never the patriots fault for losing. ever.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,782
1,540
126
And yet it did not cost them the game, in any way. They tied the game and went into OT, despite bad officiating, with every reasonable chance to win the game, having the ball first.

It is the same way that Bill Buckner has nothing to do with the Sox losing the World Series, or Bartman has nothing to do with the Cubs losing the NLCS.

Plenty of opportunities to win after such events. It is pointless to speculate on "what could have happened despite x" in any sporting event ever. Every next snap without the "bad call" could have simply been a turnover as well.

Might as well argue that the Pats technically lost the superbowl last year, right? Just replace bad coach with good coach (bad refs with good refs), and Lynch gets the ball, Seattle wins, Brady and his legions of nuthuggers go home crying, yet again.

But that's stupid.

Credit due to the Pats for surviving all the bad calls and losing on their own terms. I doubt any other team in the league would have put together that final drive to tie in regulation.

They didn't lose on their own terms. They lost because the refs limited their options. When your down 4 of your top 4 offensive players and the refs put their foot on the scale. It's tough to win any game.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |