"While it’s tough to pinpoint why August has been subject to such sharp upward revisions in the past, Stone has some theories:
The summer vacation season may play some havoc in the distribution of responses. With seasonal employment typically peaking in July, and with pay periods for seasonal workers typically being one-week intervals, it seems probable that more of the decline in seasonal payrolls may get captured in the first reading of August payrolls, than in subsequent counts wherein a higher incidence of establishments with longer pay periods get incorporated into the data.
This may account for the unusually high incidence of August payrolls surprising on the downside in the first release than being revised substantially higher in subsequent release.
It’s quite possible today’s figures will follow historical patterns and get revised higher. Let’s assume that the revisions follow previous trends and today’s number gets boosted by 62,000. That would leave the August figures at 158,000, which is better than what economists had been expecting and in-line with the surprisingly optimistic figures from the July report.
We’re not saying a potential revision would be enough of a reason for the Fed to hold back on unleashing another round of stimulus. But considering the historical trends, it may be something Bernanke & Co. consider when debating what to do next."
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/201...-report-isnt-as-bad-as-it-looks/?mod=yahoo_hs
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ebunking-the-jobs-report-conspiracy-theories/
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/goldman-payrolls-shmayrolls-investors-being-174317919.html (Gross Domestic Income instead of GDP, also?)