Official 2015 Formula One Thread!

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
Is this official? Haven't seen any 2015 F1 threads. My bad if there is one already.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I love that zebras still have the sponsor logos lol. It is like they know people are going to see the pictures and gotta make sure everyone knows about RedBull and Infinity.
 

Atty

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2006
1,540
0
76
Oh I am so excited! Ferrari looks good, exciting to see Vettel in red. McLaren looks rough but I'm excited for Honda to be back. I'm assuming their season will be half development and then after the summer break they'll be nicely put together and fighting for the front.

As far as the expectedly dominant Mercedes, I hope Rosberg gives Hamilton some trouble this season. If one of them has to win I want to see Nico at the front.
 

tweakmonkey

Senior member
Mar 11, 2013
728
32
91
tweak3d.net
Maybe I'm not as sharp with hearing as I hoped, because that Honda doesn't really sound much better than the Merc to me. And it sounds nothing even close to as good as old cars.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Honda sounded horrible.

I hope there was something wrong with it.
 

_Rick_

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2012
3,937
69
91
So, is it going to be 8, 9 or 10 teams in 6 weeks time for the first race?


And just how far back are McLaren going to be for the first half of the season?
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,560
8
0
There is, it is slow and unreliable.

this is why not starting last year was a mistake for honda. They should have powered lotus or some other useless team last year that wasnt going to be competitive. Now they gotta win right away and its not gonna happen.


Hope Ferrari can sustain the success.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
It's a bummer that Honda didn't do well in the test. Hopefully it's enough data and feedback to fix most of it.

Ferrari seemed to do well. They put in a lot of laps.
Not sure why I am this surprised.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,560
8
0
have all the teams gone with that MB innovation of the charge pipe inside the crank? That seemed to allow them to run smaller intercoolers and gain more power didnt it?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,472
867
126
It's a bummer that Honda didn't do well in the test. Hopefully it's enough data and feedback to fix most of it.

Ferrari seemed to do well. They put in a lot of laps.
Not sure why I am this surprised.

Ferrari have said that they are certain that at least one of the other top teams testing, they didn't name names, were sandbagging (not showing their full potential). Mercedes have run a ton of laps in testing so far, even more than Ferrari. They seem to have great reliability right out of the gate.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
Ferrari have said that they are certain that at least one of the other top teams testing, they didn't name names, were sandbagging (not showing their full potential). Mercedes have run a ton of laps in testing so far, even more than Ferrari. They seem to have great reliability right out of the gate.

Yep. I'm sure Ferrari indicated it was Mercedes sandbagging without naming names.
On the inside, I hope they meant Williams. :sneaky:
 

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
Merc was definitely sandbagging. With the way they walked the field last year there is no way that fell behind. They have extreme reliability on top of their performance it's going to be another walk. Ferrari looks a lot more competitive than last year. It should be a tight race for second but I don't see anyone putting on a real challenge for the top spot.
 

GreenGhost

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,272
1
81
It would be great if there were 4 competitive teams. Let's hope a second year with pretty much the same rules will allow for that.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
heyoooo, just checking in

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/alonso-taken-hospital-crash-mclaren-testing-134239397--f1.html

Barcelona (AFP) - Two-time world champion Fernando Alonso was airlifted to hospital after crashing his McLaren on Sunday's final morning of the second pre-season test in Barcelona.

...

Hopefully it's minor.

the concussion was severe enough that he might miss the first race. not a big loss since i doubt the car would even complete the race distance, at any speed. fernando is my man and i wouldn't mind him missing several (surely disasterous) races to come back at 100%.
 

KingstonU

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2006
1,405
16
81
I am hoping that Lotus and Williams are much improved from last year. Looks like the field from 2nd to 7th will be really tight which is fantastic. Hoping Kimi does much better and perhaps even beats Vettel. Also, even though I am not a fan, hoping Alonso is in good form and Mclaren surprise everyone by being competitive.

Are we going to do an Anandtech Fantasy League again? I won it last year though I don't think my strategy was anywhere near the best
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Fernando Alonso: Unanswered questions over F1 crash

The crash that has forced Fernando Alonso to miss the season-opening Australian Grand Prix has still not been fully explained, and that void of knowledge has been filled ever since by a number of theories of various degrees of credibility.

Dennis held a news conference on the Thursday after the accident at which he said Alonso was "not even concussed". This was inaccurate and a mistake.

not the first time mclaren have downplayed/denied a driver's concussion. in belgium 2011, on-board footage shows hamilton was clearly knocked unconscious (motionless, head slumped forward, no attempt at braking) for about 20 seconds.
 

merlion

Senior member
May 2, 2003
252
0
0
From thejudge13.com

A mystery of three seconds

Although several media outfits, including Sky Italia and Spain’s El Mundo are still not convinced that the electric shock theory is dead, first informations from F1’s second most credible source after Ron Dennis – the FIA – deny that Alonso could have been zapped by the car’s high capacity batteries.

Although El Mundo claims that the Honda PU has only three safety mechanisms to safeguard its electric systems, as opposed to five on the competing designs, it would still take failure of all three for Alonso to receive an electric shock. According to FIA this hasn’t happen as the indicator shows all electric systems in operation as long as the car moves and switches to green ten seconds after the car has become stationary.

Immediately after the accident Sebastian Vettel, who was driving behind Alonso, had reported that it had not looked like an accident. At a suspected speed of about 150kph Alonso seemed to veer right suddenly. The German called the scene “strange”. After he had been to the McLaren garage, he changed his tune, claiming he had not been close enough to see more than the end of the accident.

An analysis of the so far available FIA data done by Auto Motor und Sport, however, confirms Vettel’s initial version. The telemetry shows that Alonso enters the Renault corner at a speed of 215kph, which Sky Britain had falsely reported as the speed at which Alonso had lost control of the car.

At the corner entry Alonso applied full breaking power and shifted down three times, decelerating the car to a speed of 135kph, close to the speed that Vettel had estimated. The reasons for Alonso’s sudden deceleration are unclear, however such a strong breaking manoeuvre would not be needed in case of aerodynamic interference by wind.

At a speed at 135kph the car sharply changes direction towards the inside of the corner by direct steering input from the driver, who from that point on is no longer in control of the car. After veering right, the car travels towards the wall in a time of three seconds where it impacts at a speed of 105 kph.

During those 3 seconds between leaving the normal racing line and hitting the wall, the driver appears to take no measures to avert or lessen the severity of the impact, as manifested by the absence of any further steering input and the fact that the car loses a mere 30kph of speed in that time.

McLaren insist they cannot say what had happened in those three seconds and the man who could has no recollection of the event. Ron Dennis admitted that Alonso had lost consciousness for a short time, but did not specify whether that was before or after the impact.

It appears that the solution to the mystery lies within those three seconds between veering off and impacting the wall, but so far nobody is able to tell what happened. This could well explain Alonso’s prolonged hospital stay and his cancelling of the Australia start.

If the Spaniard suffered any medical condition that rendered him unconscious before the impact, as the data seem to suggest, it would be irresponsible to to return, before it has been found out what it was.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Although El Mundo claims that the Honda PU has only three safety mechanisms to safeguard its electric systems, as opposed to five on the competing designs, it would still take failure of all three for Alonso to receive an electric shock.

it would take a complete re-write of the laws of physics for alonso to be shocked by the car. once in the car, the driver and chassis are at the same voltage potential. electricity flows from high potential (the battery) to low potential (the ground). that's why a few years ago bmw/sauber technicians were shocked by the car while the driver inside wasn't (and couldn't leave the energized car). by the way, if you find yourself standing in an energized area, don't take 1 step at a time - hop with both feet together so you don't complete a path between 2 areas of different potential.

also, how would he be shocked while in his protective equipment? absolutely none of that gear will conduct either heat or electricity from a source into the driver.

the electric shock story is bogus, as is the wind blowing the car right off the road. to me, the most likely explanation is mechanical failure. despite what they claim, i'm sure mclaren and probably the fia know exactly what happened and have no intention of volunteering any ugliness on their part.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |