zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,810
- 29,564
- 146
1) Cherry picked dates don't prove any points. For example, in inflation adjusted dollars (using year 2012 as a basis, but the point is the same) was well over $2000/oz in 1980 to 1981. Now it is under $1250/oz. Since that price of gold dropped 38% does that mean that fiat currency is the better option? Of course not. There is no link when you cherry pick dates.
2) 1971 is the wrong date anyways. The US only followed the gold standard from 1879 to 1933. In 1933 it was made illegal to own gold, so the idea that you could exchange currency for gold was eliminated. Also in 1933 the POTUS was given control of the price of gold. By 1934 we were only 60% gold backed due to this. The amount of gold backing kept dropping over the years. In 1945 due to the war, we dropped the reserves another 25%. In 1965 we repealed the requirement for gold reserves on Federal Reserve deposits. In 1968, we repealed the requirement for gold reserves on Federal Reserve notes. 1971 was only a partial dropping of the remaining miniscule gold reserves as it really didn't end in practice until 1973. Then in 1976 the end of the gold standard was made official. So which date do you need for your point to be true?
3) There is no link to debt and gold prices; at least none that you proved.
4) Yes, we should pay off debt but through balanced budgets, not through fake gold backing. The US debt dropped in actual dollars once that I know of. The actual officially sanctioned US treasury debt level dropped at the end of the 1990s. As percent of GDP, the US debt dropped after the start of the country, after the civil war, after WW1, after WW2, and in Clinton's second term (combination of computer boom and among political parties).
Assuming it's the same "debt reduction," wasn't it Carnegie or Morgan that volunteered and personally paid off the national debt one year, brought it back to even? .....not that this kind of personal wealth exists any more considering the current debt, but you know what if we went back to that 80-90% tax rate that those titans once lived with; and exceedingly comfortably?