I do agree with this. But, the status quo has actually been to generate bubbles in specific markets at periodic rates, because those that are positioned to take advantage of these situations are extremely well positioned to do so. Bubbles are the supply-side necessity for how massive amounts of wealth are transferred from the middle and lower classes to the upper, upper, upper 0.1%. Every time.
It should give you pause that every single time we have these massive recessions: 88, 2000, 2008, 2020, the billionaires always, always, always come out with vastly more wealth in the end (it doesn't matter what they lose in the first weeks--they are always capitalized to flip that into massive gains on the dips), and those with their 401ks and near retirement, see everything wiped out.
This wealth transfer has been happening for a generation, and it is absolutely by design. Now, there are even more tools that have been unleashed to gas this theft a bit quicker (options trading--which had really been limited to higher investor class with extremely costly gateways to participate. But now, it is much more freely open. And, as expected, when "the people" decide to start playing, and eventually realize that if enough of them pull together to sort of equal the influence of single, ultra wealthy gambling firms (eg: Goldman's), they can really start shaking the market. Then, of course, these very same entitled ghouls that have been legally stealing from the nation's wealth for decades, suddenly think "Oh no, not like that! That's for us, peasants") Hence, GME.
So yes, bubbles are especially bad for the average person. Most of the average people. But they are a feature of this system, because they are the most effective way to redistribute wealth to a class of people that didn't exist before 1975, and some people, at the time, decided that these people are very special, and need to be the actual masters of our country. And here we are. They're never really bad for the wealthy, anyway.