so basically superb hype for the AIBs to come.What a good cooler can do...
http://oc.jagatreview.com/2016/06/t...deon-rx480-ke-1-4ghz-dengan-cooler-3rd-party/
so basically superb hype for the AIBs to come.What a good cooler can do...
http://oc.jagatreview.com/2016/06/t...deon-rx480-ke-1-4ghz-dengan-cooler-3rd-party/
The gigabyte 2x windforce 1070 is 399 at newegg. I bought one when the were in stock yesterday. Sold out in minutes. Unfortunately had to pay taxes and 5 USD shipping. Would have rather bought from b and h who has a 410 USD msi 1070, but it has a blower cooler but no taxes and free shipping to cacheapest 1070 on newegg i found is 430$ + 5$ shipping, have no idea about ur tax situation and oos.
480 are 240$ and 4$ shipping. wait for AIBs to find out how much they cost.
I know I'm going to get railed for this but I bought an EVGA SC+ 980ti for $350 today.
I sold my 390X for $260 last week after buying into all the Polaris Hype.
Needless to say I was dissapointed and did not feel that custom boards were worth waiting for.
I also have an X99 system and I'm getting really sick of using my laptop and my phone for everything.
I know people will say I should have gotten a 1070 but I really didn't want to give Nvidia any of my money ,I'm playing with the Idea of finding someone to trade for a Fury X ( which I couldn't find for sale at reasonable prices unfortunately)
edit: nm I found the 400$ windforce. weird how the search for 1070 doesn't show it, it only shows up when you specifically search for the windforce.The gigabyte 2x windforce 1070 is 399 at newegg. I bought one when the were in stock yesterday. Sold out in minutes. Unfortunately had to pay taxes and 5 USD shipping. Would have rather bought from b and h who has a 410 USD msi 1070, but it has a blower cooler but no taxes and free shipping to ca
If you're going to buy rx480 and can wait, I would recommend using jet.com. I've bought a ton of stuff off of there and gotten 30 USD off as a "first time" user many times.
(I am a very stingy **** so I like good deals)
you had 390x, 480 was never gonna be an upgrade. you need vega or 1080tiI know I'm going to get railed for this but I bought an EVGA SC+ 980ti for $350 today.
I sold my 390X for $260 last week after buying into all the Polaris Hype.
Needless to say I was dissapointed and did not feel that custom boards were worth waiting for.
I also have an X99 system and I'm getting really sick of using my laptop and my phone for everything.
I know people will say I should have gotten a 1070 but I really didn't want to give Nvidia any of my money ,I'm playing with the Idea of finding someone to trade for a Fury X ( which I couldn't find for sale at reasonable prices unfortunately)
...are people really freaking out over 40 watts? This must be some kind of joke.
It performs exactly as expected -- roughly 390/GTX 970 levels. It costs $199. People need to take a moment to let that sink in. The fact of the matter is that this card currently has THE BEST perf/$ on the market. Period.
Christ, I have an Nvidia GPU and even I'm surprised at how disappointed everyone here is.
Dude, $350 for a SC 980Ti is an excellent deal. That's close to 1080 performance right there for cheap.
Unfortunately I can't get any good deals for GPUs over here. So I only had 2 choices: RX 480 or 1070 and the 1070 was double the price.
you had 390x, 480 was never gonna be an upgrade. you need vega or 1080ti
Getting towards 1.5ghz from the reference RX 480!
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4qk6ug/4chan_uses_a_mounting_bracket_to_mount_a/
Water mod AIO.
I may end up doing that to mine. lol
Nice. I wonder where that 9.4 goes among other cards.
Comparing used cards to new cards is just silly. I don't doubt that there are some deep sale/used cards that can beat the RX 480 in price/perf. But, these are discontinued models who's supply will be drying up.
We're all worried about future prospects. AMD has only now achieved parity with Maxwell in performance/watt. What happens when you have a 250W Vega vs a 250W 1080 Ti, both using HBM? How do we fit 2 Vega chips in that small gap between 160W and 250W?
This guy is playing Siege with RX480 and this is what he got. Is 1.2938V ummm normal? Anyone comment on this yet?
That's overspec, bios should limit it to 1.15v max.
As for the OC perf, the guy that did 1.425ghz got Fury performance out of it.
But you know the funny thing, it went up to like 183W.
Compared to Nano, there's ZERO perf/w increase.
Jesus could GloFo fail any harder?
That's overspec, bios should limit it to 1.15v max.
As for the OC perf, the guy that did 1.425ghz got Fury performance out of it.
But you know the funny thing, it went up to like 183W.
Compared to Nano, there's ZERO perf/w increase.
Jesus could GloFo fail any harder?
This, I also think dx 11 doesnt matter now, dx12 is the future. Maybe next year there will be almost no games that are not optimised for dx 12.480 die size is 232 mm^2 with 5.7 billion transistors. 24.57 transistors per mm^2
1070 die size is 312 mm^2 with 7.2 billion transistors. 23.077 transistors per mm^2
1070 has a 34% larger die size.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10446/the-amd-radeon-rx-480-preview/4
If you look at just the DirectX 12 games not taking into account Gamework titles and the soon to be irrelevant DirectX11 titles that AMD probably didn't do much work in terms of Driver support as always, the 1070 is
34.5 % faster on AOS
24.3 % faster on Hitman DirectX 12
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=29716633&postcount=190This.
Even I am surprised at initial sales, we've now passed 1000, because this card is a totally amazing upgrade for 80% of gaming market and even better future proof due to its excellent DX12 performance and 8GB of VRAM.
That's overspec, bios should limit it to 1.15v max.
As for the OC perf, the guy that did 1.425ghz got Fury performance out of it.
But you know the funny thing, it went up to like 183W.
Compared to Nano, there's ZERO perf/w increase.
Jesus could GloFo fail any harder?
What beating?
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-24.htmlMoving on to DX12 and we see AMDs new architecture really coming into its own against the NVIDIA cards. It absolutely demolishes the GTX 970 across the board (even in NVIDIA-friendly games like Tomb Raider) and even manages to run circles around that once-expensive GTX 980. These tests show Maxwells performance in current DX12 applications is nothing short of embarrassing and proves this architecture simply wasnt designed with these types of workloads in mind.
Can you guys remember these people who claimed that Polaris will be better with DX11?
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/951-24/benchmark-project-cars.html
Nothing has changed. It is still a driver problem with AMD.