Official AMD Polaris Review Thread: Radeon RX 480, RX 470, and RX 460

Page 60 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,184
626
126
If it does happen I would hope it does before that coupon expires and maybe I would just preorder on Amazon and get a 1440p free sync for the same price then deal with that until I can upgrade to something more powerful next time.
 

codyray10

Senior member
Apr 14, 2008
854
4
81
Damn best buy still saying is in process after a day for my 1440p monitor. If they cancel my order I will be pretty pissed because that's the only reason I'm not ordering either one of these.

Devil is out of stock. That took all of 3 minutes lol

Dang. Yeah from the timestamp at reddit, looks like it was in stock for almost an hour lol
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,184
626
126
For some reason even when I was in the desktop graphics home page of newegg I didn't see anything about the nitro or devil cards until you mentioned them here or I googled the cards + newegg
 

guachi

Senior member
Nov 16, 2010
761
415
136
On social media and tech forums, the reason for gamers buying 480 over the similar priced 1060 is always the same: future proofing. Looks like AMD's marketing push for these next-gen API and the Doom w/ Vulkan has really hit home.

You mean... AMD marketing did something right for once?

It's why I would buy one, I guess. Every extra % of marketshare AMD gets is one step closer to a game maker adding good dx12 or Vulkan.

The other reason I'm looking for AMD is how much cheaper Freesync is. $150-300 savings is nothing to sneeze at. It's basically a free video card.
 

rsndetre

Junior Member
Jul 26, 2016
8
0
6
I would love to get Raja drunk and try to get out of him whether or not they're disappointed with the GF 14nm process or these are just design limitations with regards to power consumption. AMD packs a lot more under the hood than Nvidia does with compute and ACE's and I wonder if they'll ever be able to approach NVidia levels of efficiency with GCN without cutting things out of the design.

Disappointed with the GF 14nm ?

Man, I'm just a casual reader in this area but from what I remember GF has a partnership with Samsung and they are on second iteration of the 14 nm process while TSMC 16 nm had so many problems that they lost orders from Apple to Samsung.

What ever extras an AMD gpu is packing should only impact the power consumption when used. There is no reason for it to be more power hungry in normal gaming.

What is more plausible:
1. GF/Samsung process is a failure (but still able to push out top mobile chips ...) and is holding AMD back.
2. Could it be in fact that a company that was/is behind in the development curve for years it's only competitive now with the last generation from an competitor just because it's using one of the best processes in the industry ?


And at last, it's the pricing. The only reason AMD is still in this game after years of rebranding stuff it's because they priced their products lower then nVidia. But I'm afraid they failed this time.
RX 480 is slightly better performing then GTX970, has a slight power advantage and it's slightly better priced also. This are all small incremental improvements over the nVidia last generation. Hardly a reason to upgrade.
Meanwhile nVidia moved in leaps ahead.
In the following months, GTX970/GTX1060/RX480 kind of performance will be the bottom of the barrel for new games. Considering this, the pricing is INSANE.

nVidia has little incentive to price reasonably. They have a comfortable lead in performance. The next 2 tiers above (GTX1070 & 1080) are unchallenged and the lower part of the market is still in the same ballpark (price & performance) with their last generation, so there is little incentive to upgrade there.

Now, the DX12 performance.
Most of the people who are on the market for a a budget gaming card, are playing an online game and only need extra gaming power to enjoy from time to time titles like Witcher 3. Mainstream online games are usually slow to upgrade to new DX versions.
By the time DX12 will become mainstream, RX480 will be obsolete.

In my opinion, RX480 should have been priced like RX470 is expected to be.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Disappointed with the GF 14nm ?

Man, I'm just a casual reader in this area but from what I remember GF has a partnership with Samsung and they are on second iteration of the 14 nm process while TSMC 16 nm had so many problems that they lost orders from Apple to Samsung.

What ever extras an AMD gpu is packing should only impact the power consumption when used. There is no reason for it to be more power hungry in normal gaming.

What is more plausible:
1. GF/Samsung process is a failure (but still able to push out top mobile chips ...) and is holding AMD back.
2. Could it be in fact that a company that was/is behind in the development curve for years it's only competitive now with the last generation from an competitor just because it's using one of the best processes in the industry ?


And at last, it's the pricing. The only reason AMD is still in this game after years of rebranding stuff it's because they priced their products lower then nVidia. But I'm afraid they failed this time.
RX 480 is slightly better performing then GTX970, has a slight power advantage and it's slightly better priced also. This are all small incremental improvements over the nVidia last generation. Hardly a reason to upgrade.
Meanwhile nVidia moved in leaps ahead.
In the following months, GTX970/GTX1060/RX480 kind of performance will be the bottom of the barrel for new games. Considering this, the pricing is INSANE.

nVidia has little incentive to price reasonably. They have a comfortable lead in performance. The next 2 tiers above (GTX1070 & 1080) are unchallenged and the lower part of the market is still in the same ballpark (price & performance) with their last generation, so there is little incentive to upgrade there.

Now, the DX12 performance.
Most of the people who are on the market for a a budget gaming card, are playing an online game and only need extra gaming power to enjoy from time to time titles like Witcher 3. Mainstream online games are usually slow to upgrade to new DX versions.
By the time DX12 will become mainstream, RX480 will be obsolete.

In my opinion, RX480 should have been priced like RX470 is expected to be.

See this is what happens when someone assumes something.
https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/would-you-buy-gtx-1060-or-rx-480.224303/

According to an ongoing pole @ TPU the 480 is miles ahead in a pole, with many thousands of votes, "Which would you purchase?"

Just because we have a handful of people here who like to make dozens of posts each knocking the 480 doesn't mean that's the way most people are feeling. I hope you don't end up another one of these people who simply post the same biased opinion over and over making it seem like it's fact.
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,361
136
By the time DX12 will become mainstream, RX480 will be obsolete.

Currently im playing Ashes Of The Singularity, HITMAN, Forza Motorsport 6: Apex

Then im going to get Total War : Warhammer and DOOM, late August im getting Deus Ex : Mankind Divided and then I will definitely get Civilization VI, im also waiting to see how Watch Dog II will be in late 2016.

I have left out BF 1 because currently i dont really like the WW1 theme, i may change my view as time closes to release though.

You dont need a $800 card to play those games, even a RX 460 at $99 will be able to produce 40-60fps at Low/medium/high (depending on the game) 1080p settings.

RX 460 will be close to R7 360 performance.

Examples,

More than 45fps minimum on DOOM Vulkan at 1080p Ultra Quality settings, go to High settings and you will get ~60fps minimum on the RX 460.



Forza Motorsport6 apex gets 40-50fps on the wet at 1080p medium settings on the R7 360. It should do the same on the RX 460.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IdofKeEsuE

We dont have to wait for DX-12 to become mainstream, we have DX-12 games TODAY and many more are coming the coming months. So no, RX-480 or any 400 series will not be obsolete for DX-12 gaming anytime soon. On the other hand we cannot say the same for the NV Pascal cards, we have to wait and see how those will perform at the end of the year in those new DX-12 games and see if they will be able to hold on or if they will start to fall behind again.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Heard the same BS in 2014, that by the time DX12 games are here, GPUs back then would be obsolete.

Well no. GCN like Hawaii since 2013, still excel at 1080 and 1440p in DX12/Vulkan.

The idea that "by the time more DX12 games arrive, current stuff is obsolete" is utter nonsense.

We're getting a LOT of new major games that are DX12 in the next few months. I don't think current GPUs are suddenly going to be unplayable in that timeframe. Nor for the rest of 2017 and 2018.
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,361
136
Heard the same BS in 2014, that by the time DX12 games are here, GPUs back then would be obsolete.

Well no. GCN like Hawaii since 2013, still excel at 1080 and 1440p in DX12/Vulkan.

The idea that "by the time more DX12 games arrive, current stuff is obsolete" is utter nonsense.

We're getting a LOT of new major games that are DX12 in the next few months. I don't think current GPUs are suddenly going to be unplayable in that timeframe. Nor for the rest of 2017 and 2018.

Yea, Hawaii will get a special place in the GPU pantheon of cards, 2013 release and it still going strong in 2016 and keep going. You just have to look at 2013 Kepler GTX 780 and 780Ti to appreciate what this Chip have managed to do so far.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Yea, Hawaii will get a special place in the GPU pantheon of cards, 2013 release and it still going strong in 2016 and keep going. You just have to look at 2013 Kepler GTX 780 and 780Ti to appreciate what this Chip have managed to do so far.

According to the chart in your prior post it's now more than twice as fast in Doom, 106fps vs. 47fps. Titan is getting beaten by the 7970.


Some would have you believe that's because AMD had crap drivers before. It's because nVidia has abandoned their customers who they've already made bank on. I would never give them my hard earned money.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
According to the chart in your prior post it's now more than twice as fast in Doom, 106fps vs. 47fps. Titan is getting beaten by the 7970.


Some would have you believe that's because AMD had crap drivers before. It's because nVidia has abandoned their customers who they've already made bank on. I would never give them my hard earned money.

It's actually worse than that, GameGPU.Ru didn't run with Async Compute on.

This is their setting:



And the scene they tested was a passive non-combat scene. Vulkan's biggest gains are in intense combat with lots of enemies, explosions and particles etc.

I don't expect all the DX12 games will have such a huge gain for GCN, as they won't be as well coded.

But the Forza 6 and Quantum Break results shows what a *neutral* console port will result in for GCN on PC. I linked the benches in the other thread, 15-20% gains for RX 480 vs 1060.
 

rsndetre

Junior Member
Jul 26, 2016
8
0
6
Currently im playing Ashes Of The Singularity, HITMAN, Forza Motorsport 6: Apex

Then im going to get Total War : Warhammer and DOOM, late August im getting Deus Ex : Mankind Divided and then I will definitely get Civilization VI, im also waiting to see how Watch Dog II will be in late 2016.

Nobody cares about Forza Motorsport 6 and whatever, except you and few other dudes. Let me explain again. Look at what is played mostly:

http://www.statista.com/statistics/251222/most-played-pc-games/

Most of the games there are very light on graphic card department and won't upgrade to DX12 any time soon. Basically that is the mainstream market. Those guys don't need powerful graphics. DX12 is a non issue for them.

For the other part of the market, the enthusiasts that are playing every new game release, they most likely already have a capable gpu like GTX970. For them, RX480 is not an worthy upgrade. They will go for GTX1070 / 1080 or stay on what they have now.


Budget market gaming is mmo stuff and the only incentive for someone like me to buy a GTX1060/RX480 is to enjoy from time to time like you said, new game releases. But selling what will be entry level gpu-s for playing with decent settings in new games, at that price, it's a mistake. nVidia doesn't care much because the current situation will push enthusiasts to upgrade to more expensive cards but AMD wants to gain market. They should price more aggressively.

In Europe an RX480 8Gb sells well over 300 euro, vat included. That's insane for a budget card. What ever hype there is now, I don't see it lasting long.



I posted here because I stumbled on this thread being genuinely interested in RX 480, but as usual, there is so much fanboy stuff that is annoying.
 
Last edited:

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,894
162
106
Now that the dust has settled somewhat... is the RX480 still looking better in the med/long run because of dx12/async? From what I see, certain dx12 benches like Vulkan Doom looks heavily skewed in favour of AMD but not other dx12 games.
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,184
626
126
Now that the dust has settled somewhat... is the RX480 still looking better in the med/long run because of dx12/async? From what I see, certain dx12 benches like Vulkan Doom looks heavily skewed in favour of AMD but not other dx12 games.
It depends on the game you will play but it does seem that way at least for people on 1080p. Also consider how long you would keep the card too.
 

richaron

Golden Member
Mar 27, 2012
1,357
329
136
Now that the dust has settled somewhat... is the RX480 still looking better in the med/long run because of dx12/async? From what I see, certain dx12 benches like Vulkan Doom looks heavily skewed in favour of AMD but not other dx12 games.

Actually Doom Vulcan is the best example we have of a properly optimized game engine. It runs and looks great on all cards and it's designed to take full advantage of all features of a modern API.

A good example of being skewed is the Time Spy benchmark, which calls itself a DX12 benchmark but does not take full advantage of DX12, it only uses code paths which both companies support. Thus performance is left on the table for the cards with more advanced features.

To answer the question; yes 480 is looking better, how much depends... We are seeing more of both types of games as time goes by, and in both the 480 is improving. In poorly optimized code, or code written with an agenda, the improvements are mild and the status quo is barely threatened. I like to think as dev's get more time/XP the code will improve also, but you'll need a crystal ball to know for sure..
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,803
29,553
146
Actually Doom Vulcan is the best example we have of a properly optimized game engine. It runs and looks great on all cards and it's designed to take full advantage of all features of a modern API.

A good example of being skewed is the Time Spy benchmark, which calls itself a DX12 benchmark but does not take full advantage of DX12, it only uses code paths which both companies support. Thus performance is left on the table for the cards with more advanced features.

To answer the question; yes 480 is looking better, how much depends... We are seeing more of both types of games as time goes by, and in both the 480 is improving. In poorly optimized code, or code written with an agenda, the improvements are mild and the status quo is barely threatened. I like to think as dev's get more time/XP the code will improve also, but you'll need a crystal ball to know for sure..

Well, how do we increase the devs XP faster so they can level up more efficiently?

Should we send them out to grind 1-3xp bunnies in swarms rather than waste their time on long RAIDs with a small handful of large XP bursts?

:hmm:
 

boozzer

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2012
1,549
18
81
Well, how do we increase the devs XP faster so they can level up more efficiently?

Should we send them out to grind 1-3xp bunnies in swarms rather than waste their time on long RAIDs with a small handful of large XP bursts?

:hmm:
there will always be newbs like the tomb raider devs. they may even be trolls hired to disrupt the raids.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,354
5,012
136
Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence inexperience.

Latest ROTTR patch shows progress in the right direction, at least.
 

boozzer

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2012
1,549
18
81
Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence inexperience.

Latest ROTTR patch shows progress in the right direction, at least.
that is why you can always suspect foul play, just don't make any claims like you are 100% sure when it is just suspicion.
 

redzo

Senior member
Nov 21, 2007
547
5
81
In Europe an RX480 8Gb sells well over 300 euro, vat included. That's insane for a budget card. What ever hype there is now, I don't see it lasting long.
Unfortunately, yes. Sapphire nitro+ 8GB is a little more expensive than most aib OC 1060 where I live. And all are out of stock(rx480 and 1060), while 970 it's on stock at the same price range. My local online retailers are either gold diggers or incompetents.
 

S.H.O.D.A.N.

Senior member
Mar 22, 2014
205
0
41
Unfortunately, yes. Sapphire nitro+ 8GB is a little more expensive than most aib OC 1060 where I live. And all are out of stock(rx480 and 1060), while 970 it's on stock at the same price range. My local online retailers are either gold diggers or incompetents.

Or perhaps there's simply enough demand to drive the price up.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |