Official AMD Ryzen Benchmarks, Reviews, Prices, and Discussion

Page 194 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,758
14,785
136
Markfw it is great that you got that overclock on non-high end board that costs ~100$. I was a bit skeptical it could be done but you proved me wrong
Well while waiting on the Taichi, I just said "I will take what I can get" and it was easy to do once I realized that my NVMe SSD was overheating, and put a heatsink on it. It was $89, and I am very happy for now. I read about all the brands, and ASRock seemed to be the winner for the Ryzen, and I say they are for now. And yes, its stable, 23 hours@100% load on all 16 threads@ 4 ghz and memory @2933 CL14. I will try for 3200, but I am happy with that for now, as even the best benchmarkers seems to hit a wall @2933, but thats dang close to 3200.
 

hotstocks

Member
Jun 20, 2008
81
26
91
inf64, I agree that Ryzen is fantastic for productivity, and with the correct memory will be great for 1080p gaming as well. I have done a ton of reading and at this point what it boils down to is I am NOT going to accept memory speeds of less than 3200 C14, and I also want 32GB. So I either have to pay like $175 and settle for 16gb of G.Skill 3200 c14 samsung (which I really want 32gb) or I have to use 32gb of 2666 ram, which is not acceptable. So if I build now I would then have to Ebay my ram in a month or two when I can get what I really want and NEED, which is 32gb of 3200mhz or higher ram with tight timings. So that is why I and others are in a bind or waiting game now. Sure anyone can just buy a 1700 with stock cooler and run stock speeds and 2666mhz ram, but most people on these forums are not going to do that. They are NOT going to skimp on the ram, especially when 3200mhz or higher is needed to be competitive with Intel in gaming. If you are going to build a Ryzen system, you build it right. Why skimp on memory to save $100 and then later kick yourself because you KNEW you didn't have enough memory or fast enough memory to make Ryzen shine?
 

Rayniac

Member
Oct 23, 2016
78
13
41
OK, so I did some reading FIRST, then picked reasonable parts that are supposed to work, and in 2 hours, I have a perfectly working and stable system with a 400 mhz overclock, and at the memory settings advertised. So if you have a problem getting things to work, maybe you should go do some more reading.

Edit, and Yes I have been building systems and tweaking since the mid 1980's.
So what kind of reading would you suggest for someone looking to build a Ryzen system? What are the pitfalls that I should avoid?
 

hotstocks

Member
Jun 20, 2008
81
26
91
Mark, so I assume you are using g.skill 2X8 16gb 3200 c14 kit? And is their just a 2933 option in the bios that just works, or are you getting 2933 at a certain bclk that is not standard 100?
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,765
4,223
136
inf64, I agree that Ryzen is fantastic for productivity, and with the correct memory will be great for 1080p gaming as well. I have done a ton of reading and at this point what it boils down to is I am NOT going to accept memory speeds of less than 3200 C14, and I also want 32GB. So I either have to pay like $175 and settle for 16gb of G.Skill 3200 c14 samsung (which I really want 32gb) or I have to use 32gb of 2666 ram, which is not acceptable. So if I build now I would then have to Ebay my ram in a month or two when I can get what I really want and NEED, which is 32gb of 3200mhz or higher ram with tight timings. So that is why I and others are in a bind or waiting game now. Sure anyone can just buy a 1700 with stock cooler and run stock speeds and 2666mhz ram, but most people on these forums are not going to do that. They are NOT going to skimp on the ram, especially when 3200mhz or higher is needed to be competitive with Intel in gaming. If you are going to build a Ryzen system, you build it right. Why skimp on memory to save $100 and then later kick yourself because you KNEW you didn't have enough memory or fast enough memory to make Ryzen shine?
I think you should just skip Ryzen and go with intel setup (whatever socket suits your needs).


Well while waiting on the Taichi, I just said "I will take what I can get" and it was easy to do once I realized that my NVMe SSD was overheating, and put a heatsink on it. It was $89, and I am very happy for now. I read about all the brands, and ASRock seemed to be the winner for the Ryzen, and I say they are for now. And yes, its stable, 23 hours@100% load on all 16 threads@ 4 ghz and memory @2933 CL14. I will try for 3200, but I am happy with that for now, as even the best benchmarkers seems to hit a wall @2933, but thats dang close to 3200.

That is fantastic result man, I'm glad it is folding and is stable at that. Taichi is truly a beautiful board, the problem is that it's nowhere to be found :/. In Europe there are few places in Austria and Germany that got them but early prices were very inflated so it was really not worth it IMO.
 
Reactions: Drazick

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,758
14,785
136
So what kind of reading would you suggest for someone looking to build a Ryzen system? What are the pitfalls that I should avoid?
Well, mostly on this forum, all the Ryzen threads, and all the benchmarks from all the benchmarking articles referenced. The top few things I learned:

1) No matter the system, it you want fast, you have to pay the price for fast ram. My 3200 CL14 (16 gig) was $170, and you have to get the samsung-b chips (I think thats it) the Gskill Trident ones are great.
2) Stay away from ASUS until they fix their bricking issue. I like ASRock the best ATM.
3) If you have an NVMe SSD, get a heatsink for it (I learned that from personal experience, but it was mentioned in a thread that they get hot)
4) Get a good heatsink and a good power supply.
5) Don't expect the "perfect" results until everyone learns the new Ryzen. If you OC is a little lower, remember, thats the silicon lottery. Intel never had a "perfect" release of a new technology.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,758
14,785
136
Mark, so I assume you are using g.skill 2X8 16gb 3200 c14 kit? And is their just a 2933 option in the bios that just works, or are you getting 2933 at a certain bclk that is not standard 100?
I just read that thats the best most got, and have been too busy to try the full 3200, it might do it. In Ryzen master, you just ckick the speed. It allows only certain values, bios are the same choices, its really easy.
This stuff: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820232205

Just by memory, I think its 2133, 2400,2666, 2933 and 3200. I hate to waste some good crunching time by messing with a perfectly working system that is already so tweaked.
 
Reactions: hotstocks

hotstocks

Member
Jun 20, 2008
81
26
91
Thanks, that was the kit I was looking at and I probably wouldn't even install Ryzen master, I would do it all from bios, good to know their is a 2933 and 3200 speed in ram options. I guess the only thing I am really waiting for is to see if 32gb 2X16 3200 kits will work soon.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,758
14,785
136
Thanks, that was the kit I was looking at and I probably wouldn't even install Ryzen master, I would do it all from bios, good to know their is a 2933 and 3200 speed in ram options. I guess the only thing I am really waiting for is to see if 32gb 2X16 3200 kits will work soon.
No idea, but I have heard that for high speed, you have to only have 2 sticks. 16 gig is all I need.

Edit, and those options are on the $89 ASRock AB350 pro4 motherboard, no idea what other motherboards have.

Edit: this one: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157761

But I am still waiting on the Taichi board to come into stock, as its the king ATM.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,813
11,168
136
Hotstocks, fwiw I think you are trolling, or at least it comes across that way. Even people who have bricked c6h boards have more constructive statements to make than those in your rant. Most of the people who own Ryzen systems are pretty happy with them, despite the teething pains. There's more performance to be had in the coming weeks.

Well while waiting on the Taichi

I will say this much . . . while I think the Taichi has some more potential, what you are running now with your sub $100 board is about 95-99% of the performance I have currently. The power/heat output escalation beyond 1.35v is so severe that it's almost not worth it to go there. Just running Level 1 LLC to get my 4 GHz stable in AVX workloads raises Tctl to ~90C and raises socket temp to ~50C on my NH-D15. Dunno if I'm even going to bother trying to get 4.1 stable for non-AVX workloads. What I need is more memory speed.
 
Reactions: inf64

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
Thanks, that was the kit I was looking at and I probably wouldn't even install Ryzen master, I would do it all from bios, good to know their is a 2933 and 3200 speed in ram options. I guess the only thing I am really waiting for is to see if 32gb 2X16 3200 kits will work soon.
Probably they will come.

But anyway in 1 year zen plus is comming. Tock. And i will eat my hat if ram bandwith and especially latency is not adressed and #1 priority along side a slew of other improvements.

Then 1-1.5 year after zen plus plus on 7nm. TOCK. Its probably more of a slam.

And hey in 4 months perhaps we will even see a small facelift of zen.
We also get a new uefi in may.

Its a really fast progress ahead of us.
So if you can wait you will be rewarded.

But i really feel rewarded by having s cheap 8c rig today. And i "needed" it.
Yes the asus software is very buggy. Yes bios is immature. But until now its the most stable pc i have had for 30 years.

My sample have been pretty easy to oc in the sense that it either works or doesnt. It's not like you get a crash after 5 hrs and wonders if it was because you oc it.
 

Magic Hate Ball

Senior member
Feb 2, 2017
290
250
96
Probably they will come.

But anyway in 1 year zen plus is comming. Tock. And i will eat my hat if ram bandwith and especially latency is not adressed and #1 priority along side a slew of other improvements.

Then 1-1.5 year after zen plus plus on 7nm. TOCK. Its probably more of a slam.

And hey in 4 months perhaps we will even see a small facelift of zen.
We also get a new uefi in may.

Its a really fast progress ahead of us.
So if you can wait you will be rewarded.

But i really feel rewarded by having s cheap 8c rig today. And i "needed" it.
Yes the asus software is very buggy. Yes bios is immature. But until now its the most stable pc i have had for 30 years.

My sample have been pretty easy to oc in the sense that it either works or doesnt. It's not like you get a crash after 5 hrs and wonders if it was because you oc it.

I'll admit, buying an 1800X was an inefficient impulse of "TAKE MY MONEY" on my part. I'm not unhappy though, and if I resell it or repurpose it in a year or two and upgrade to Zen+ or Zen++ I'll be happy to support competition in this market.

I'll be very interested to see how changes in the UEFI and such work out as the months go on.

Now where is my my damned NZXT bracket
 
Reactions: sushukka

lobz

Platinum Member
Feb 10, 2017
2,057
2,856
136
inf64, I am not trolling. And I certainly understand new technology and have overclocked and built systems both AMD and INTEL for 25 years. Yeah, I guess I am venting though, but that still does not change what I have posted is absolute fact. I'm well aware of past new platforms where it took a few minutes or at worst hours in the bios to get your new build 100% stable or memory working at advertised speeds. But this is a WHOLE different ball game, and if you can't see that for yourself, or from the 1000 posts of others with major problems and no stability, then I can't help you. It just wasn't ready to be released. There is no shame or harm in admitting that.
I guess you weren't born yet, when intel came out with x58, x79 and x99 in alpha testing phase
 

Thunder 57

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2007
2,814
4,108
136
Someone gets my point (user and mobo manufacturer) and made a short video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q53U1wWNqZE

Drops Mic.

Hardly a Mic drop moment. New motherboards on a new chipset with a new CPU, there are going to be some kinks to work out. AMD is not alone in this, as above posters have mentioned. It may be frustrating, but that is the price you pay to be on the latest and greatest hardware.
 
Reactions: .vodka and sushukka

st0neh

Junior Member
Mar 19, 2017
2
0
1
Intel never had a "perfect" release of a new technology.

Every post regarding Ryzen on any tech site should be accompanied by a reminder of the X99 launch.

So we can all have nightmares. Again.




You signed up here just to troll with your first post?

This is a no-trolling zone/forum.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sushukka

Member
Mar 17, 2017
52
39
61
inf64, I am not trolling. And I certainly understand new technology and have overclocked and built systems both AMD and INTEL for 25 years. Yeah, I guess I am venting though, but that still does not change what I have posted is absolute fact. I'm well aware of past new platforms where it took a few minutes or at worst hours in the bios to get your new build 100% stable or memory working at advertised speeds. But this is a WHOLE different ball game, and if you can't see that for yourself, or from the 1000 posts of others with major problems and no stability, then I can't help you. It just wasn't ready to be released. There is no shame or harm in admitting that.
With new architecture there are always some hickups at the beginning. Out of all PCs I have been built (also appr. 25 years) the worst nightmare was the brand new Nehalem i7 architecture when it came out: it took several months of active communication with two mobo manufacturers to get it stable enough. Point is that it wasn't stable even in normal usage, no fancy tunings, best quality hardware used etc. Broadwell didn't behave too well either. Why the later Intel processor/mobo combinations have had better behaviour is imo because there have been actually little to none changes: year after year same turd in different packets with little more MHz and ofc higher price...and I think everybody everybody likes if AMD can stop that with their new architecture and design.
Also need to say that there are other people who have also read like 1000000 posts and found out different results. If you want a stable and the most cost-efficient CPU, buy Ryzen but let the automation handle the overclocking in its defined ranges, use the officially supported memory speeds and that's it. Even if "gimped" with "slow" memory it still offers the best bang for the buck especially when the next Ryzen 5 series comes out.
 
Reactions: guachi

hotstocks

Member
Jun 20, 2008
81
26
91
Sometimes I just have to remind myself PATIENCE. Yeah, I always want the latest and greatest. Was one of the first guys to get and love a Samsung Galaxy Note 7, then had to return it because they all were recalled and fire hazards. I am sure Ryen will be a great setup and I will build one. But it was rushed out before mobo and ram manufacturers were on board. I've waited a month, I can wait another if the kinks will be worked out. I don't need the aggravation of a mobo recall or mobo that can't hit high ram frequencies in May with 32gb or possible mobos or cpus dying after a month of overclocking. This time around I am not going to be the first guy to beta test for them. G.Skill is jumping on board with all the ram problems with their Flare X kits. Sure they are going to be more expensive and really just the same as their 3200C14 kits, but with AMD timings programmed instead of intels, but at least they will be guaranteed to work at 3200 without any hoops to jump thru. I am sure Corsair will follow. So what AMD really is saying is yes we rushed this out, but in May (when it really should have came out) we will have faster than 3200mhz memory support, so if you buy ram now, you will feel like a loser in a month in a half. Not my idea of a smooth launch.
 

st0neh

Junior Member
Mar 19, 2017
2
0
1
You signed up here just to troll with your first post?

This is a no-trolling zone/forum.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director

How on earth was that trolling?

I was pointing out that everyone ranting about the Ryzen launch is a tad silly when the X99 launch was just as bad.




You have an issue with the moderation?
Make a thread in the Moderation Discussions forum.

Please read the rules before posting.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/anandtech-forum-guidelines.60552/
For you specifically 12,13.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sushukka

Member
Mar 17, 2017
52
39
61
Sometimes I just have to remind myself PATIENCE. Yeah, I always want the latest and greatest. Was one of the first guys to get and love a Samsung Galaxy Note 7, then had to return it because they all were recalled and fire hazards. I am sure Ryen will be a great setup and I will build one. But it was rushed out before mobo and ram manufacturers were on board. I've waited a month, I can wait another if the kinks will be worked out. I don't need the aggravation of a mobo recall or mobo that can't hit high ram frequencies in May with 32gb or possible mobos or cpus dying after a month of overclocking. This time around I am not going to be the first guy to beta test for them. G.Skill is jumping on board with all the ram problems with their Flare X kits. Sure they are going to be more expensive and really just the same as their 3200C14 kits, but with AMD timings programmed instead of intels, but at least they will be guaranteed to work at 3200 without any hoops to jump thru. I am sure Corsair will follow. So what AMD really is saying is yes we rushed this out, but in May (when it really should have came out) we will have faster than 3200mhz memory support, so if you buy ram now, you will feel like a loser in a month in a half. Not my idea of a smooth launch.
It's the early adopter's pain; they/we're all in some way alpha/beta testers. R7 is for early adopters where R5 and R3 will be for the mass market. I'm getting old and have not that much time to fight with the initial problems anymore, therefore I'll probably just settle with R5 1600X and with little more waiting I can combine that with Vega. In that timeframe the 3200 memory thing and initial issues will be most probably sorted out. Still clapping hands to AMD: half a year before this kind of better performing rig would have cost quite a much more.
 
Reactions: Dresdenboy

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
I just read that thats the best most got, and have been too busy to try the full 3200, it might do it. In Ryzen master, you just ckick the speed. It allows only certain values, bios are the same choices, its really easy.
This stuff: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820232205

Just by memory, I think its 2133, 2400,2666, 2933 and 3200. I hate to waste some good crunching time by messing with a perfectly working system that is already so tweaked.

oh awesome, thanks for the info! The type of data that I've been looking for, as I'm slowly planning to build something over the next ....4 or 5 months? That kit is currently $149 at Newegg btw (without tax).


I see most people are using 700W+ PSUs in their builds. Is this because you guys already have the PSU lying around, and/or because of uncertain OC potential going into it? I know no one can really say anything definitive right now regarding Vega 10 or 11 (what I'm planning to put in this box), or comparing with 1600X, but I'm wondering if you guys think a 450-500W PSU would be fine for such a system? I'd like to spend less on PSU, as long as it's still a solid unit (some very good semi-full modular 80+ Corsairs out there @ 450-500W for about $30-50 right now)

I'm going to wait for 1600X release and availability, and choose between that and a 1700, depending on performance and where things stand after some maturity and no wonky BIOS to deal with. I already have a small case to put this in, so I'm looking for only the mATX or ITX mobos that aren't yet out. I know this is stupid with so much being unknown with unreleased products (Vega), but I'd like to be able to shop around and hunt for deals when they are available, hence the potential of getting a PSU well before I know actual requirements. I'm not much of an overclocker, though, so I feel that I need to worry about this too much...but if Ryzen does make this easier when BIOS is worked out, then I might want to dabble.

Let's assume the biggest Vega is 225-250 TDP (whatever that means for actual W), Ryzen 1600X-1700 = 65-95W TDP, 1 NvMe M.2 SSD, 1-2 SATA SSD (I have a 500gb 950 Evo that will will be moving over), some unknown mATX/ITX mobo, and those 2 sticks of GSkill memory.
 
Reactions: wembley
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |