That's why you do several runs, and throw out outliers.Games are typically not deterministic, which means that there will be subtle differences each run. Add unpredictable network latency to that, and the inputs will end up out of sync.
So yes, it's quite complicated.
Adored hit the nail on the head regarding these benchmarks. As with statistics, you can make numbers say what you want within reason.
It's shown in the video when he highlights the youtube comments.Where the f*** is this guy from? Can barley understand him...
Where the f*** is this guy from? Can barley understand him...
That's not going to help if in one run the input occurs at the right time and a bullet hits, then in the next run it occurs slightly later and misses. Like a butterfly, small differences in input timing will add up to massive differences in outcome.That's why you do several runs, and throw out outliers.
Gamer's Nexus supposedly tests WatchDogs2 by running up and down an empty alley for 30 seconds. That will absolutely give you consisted results. Only problem being these results are consistently worthless results, because they aren't indicative of actual gameplay.
He's Scottish.Sweden.
Where the f*** is this guy from? Can barley understand him...
Well, I did say I from SW Va! I am uncouth and unworldly.He's Scottish.
re. multiplayer benchmarks...
is it really beyond the wit of man to have several remote computers send keyboard/mouse scripted actions of "players" in a multi-player environment, as well as have a keyboard/mouse script on the local computer that can allow for a repeated multi-"player" environment for benchmarking?
It can't be much more complicated.
The 6950x is a quad-channel setup and yet consumes 30Watts lower than the 1800x while only being 8fps slower. The 1700x is 4fps faster while consuming 6 watts more. So yeah, "no free lunch," my brother!
The TI NexFETs used on the higher-end boards like the Asus C6H and Asrock Taichi are rated 25A continuous output at 90% efficiency and 40A maximum.
Sure, but wouldn't that require 64 BF1 accounts though?
Games are typically not deterministic, which means that there will be subtle differences each run.
There is a lot more to it than just AI. Physics engines for instance can yield wildly different results on multiple runs, even given identical inputs. There is often deliberate randomness introduced too, including to things that are significant, like the direction a bullet is fired in. Once enough differences creep in, then the entire rest of the script is invalid.Every player on the map would be running from a script - therefore you remove the "AI" out of it.
If we look at the stilt fmax vs V graph there is a liniar correlation all the way up to 3.3GHz. I stlill dont understand it is so high?You are comparing with a 10 cores at lower clocks.
You have to look at the curve not at a fixed speed to compare.
Summit Ridge does best in efficiency bellow 1V.
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/Ashes-Singularity-Gets-Ryzen-Performance-Update“I’ve always been vocal about taking advantage of every ounce of performance the PC has to offer. That’s why I’m a strong proponent of DirectX 12 and Vulkan® because of the way these APIs allow us to access multiple CPU cores, and that’s why the AMD Ryzen processor has so much potential,” said Stardock and Oxide CEO Brad Wardell. “As good as AMD Ryzen is right now – and it’s remarkably fast – we’ve already seen that we can tweak games like Ashes of the Singularity to take even more advantage of its impressive core count and processing power. AMD Ryzen brings resources to the table that will change what people will come to expect from a PC gaming experience.”
Well, evidently it starts to keep up with Broadwell-E in games too, granted i don't fancy anyone turning his Ryzen into a furnace for the sake of 10% more performance.What happens when games are tuned for Ryzen?
Come again?Well, evidently it starts to keep up with Broadwell-E in games too, granted i don't fancy anyone turning his Ryzen into a furnace for the sake of 10% more performance.
Well, evidently it starts to keep up with Broadwell-E in games too, granted i don't fancy anyone turning his Ryzen into a furnace for the sake of 10% more performance.
Seems you think they were doing O/C'ing, no, that wasn't the case.Well, evidently it starts to keep up with Broadwell-E in games too, granted i don't fancy anyone turning his Ryzen into a furnace for the sake of 10% more performance.