I'm not sure I've ever seen a stronger example of confirmation bias than in those comments haha - holy cow.
Well honestly the OP of that thread/article was the most biased piece of crap I ever seen.
That's why I reacted so blatantly biased and trolled the AMD fanboys so bad it carried over to this website. So don't take the bait from another web site. Reporting posts as I type.
I thought that was obvious.
examples of his BS:
" And we all know how Intel's line-up has
almost been torn apart by Ryzen's aggressive core and thread-count"
"all of these assert
AMD's dominance in a pure price-performance ratio"
"
Intel scrambling to respond to a launch that caught the blue giant squarely with its figurative pants down"
"over the now defunct and best-forgotten Bulldozer debacle was something
Intel wasn't quite counting on. Intel had three choices: keep its stalwart posture with no price decreases on its line-up and
see Ryzen CPUs flying off the shelves,"
"to handle
Ryzen's core and thread
dominance"
"those are all decisions that now show us
how ridiculous it is that Intel is selling two-core, four thread i3 processors for the premium it has"
"enter a
collision course with AMD's expected X399 platform, which again boast of higher core-counts - and
probably better performance-per-watt - than Intel's offerings"
"which are supposed to
bring Intel back in the mainstream processor game"
"
"I think "
scrambling" is a more than fair description on the current Intel landscape."
The article was ridiculous and the OP was written by the News editor and staff of Techpowerup.
He interjected his biased opinions, and over the top wording the best he could to make Intel look like they have no Idea how to run a business.
I've posted there about 25 times in 6 years, and now you can see why.
If I wanted to stealth troll, you would not even know it till the report button was hit 4 times..
and this a little off topic so carry on with your thread,
thanks