They are testing at the resolutions their readers most likely are using. Here in the states that won't be the case. You can clearly see as the resolution goes up the gap gets closer. At 1440p and 4K the gap will likely be even less.
They are testing at the resolutions their readers most likely are using. Here in the states that won't be the case. You can clearly see as the resolution goes up the gap gets closer. At 1440p and 4K the gap will likely be even less.I'm annoyed at that Iranian leaked review honestly. Paired it only with 2133mhz RAM and used resolutions like 1366x768? 1600x900? If you've got that much money to drop on a mobo and that cpu surely you have a 1080p monitor at least. Tetsing ita t that resolution is arbitrary at best.
The memory latency thing though seems to be high like every leak says. What is up.
Based on the slide it says "twice the xfr headroom" for x versions. If this is true, the vanilla 1700 will clock to 3.75 Ghz on single core.The 1700 apparently does have a seemingly nerfed version of xfr, and you need an x370 board to use xfr.
Considering that in their demo it took watercooling to get 1800X to clock 100Mhz above stock boost clock, that "nerfed" version does not look relevant.The 1700 apparently does have a seemingly nerfed version of xfr, and you need an x370 board to use xfr.
The issue here is that they are using 4k scenarios and the only game i trust to be CPU limited on ultra settings even on Titan XP (that they use) is Civ VI... That Ryzen loses. And AotS that Ryzen ties. OTOH the differences on other titles are too pronounced to be GPU caused.Its the third slide from that earlier leak using the Core i7 6800K and Core i7 7700K. So that is eight core vs eight core now.
Would not be surprised if the difference between them was 100-200Mhz. Is 100-200Mhz worth $100 (or how much was it)? You decide.My biggest question is whether a good 1700X overclock is going to be comparable to a good 1800X overclock.
Also, holy cow, that is like a freaking reviewer's Harry Potter.
P. S. And hell yes, i will get home right to the flood of Ryzen reviews.
The fact that when receiving and trying that ryzen made him change his thought patterns, kind of tells us what we need to know without reviewsAmazing what being handed a Ryzen CPU can do to one's viewpoints on the product.
It's like my nVidiot friend when he was astonished at how fast and clean the graphics were on my system (no idea what video card I had). He asked how I did it... I told him I was running a 5770. He just about blew a gasket.
Crossfire requirements (complete list):
2~4 AMD GPUs running same GPU die (cut-down is fine).
Both installed in the same system at the same time (enough PCI-e x16 slots)
Proper driver installed.
Crossfire enabled in driver.
That's it. No special motherboard/chipset support is required.
Why do you say such things? We have leaks?That's not even the reviewer guide. Ryzen has no latency issues FYI, far from the case.
You really need to have a good read before posting
Sorry, can you elaborate? Was this posted before?You really need to have a good read before posting
Yeah, just a press briefing, consider it Chapter I.That's not even the reviewer guide.
Well, you are welcome to provide some resemblance of evidence. Or tell me to wait 21 hours.Ryzen has no latency issues FYI, far from the case.
Yeah but B350 doesn't allow splitting the 16x lanes from the CPU into 2x8xlanes.
Again confirmed in newest leak (see above):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By7_TCzoyL9oejlBV1R0WVdKMkU/view
That is a great showing imo. April cannot get here soon enough! 1600xNicked this off Overclockers UK forums:
Its the third slide from that earlier leak using the Core i7 6800K and Core i7 7700K. So that is eight core vs eight core now.
Nicked this off Overclockers UK forums:
Its the third slide from that earlier leak using the Core i7 6800K and Core i7 7700K. So that is eight core vs eight core now.
That review was done with an oldes sample. 2133 ddr, no boost, old bios etc..Sorry, can you elaborate? Was this posted before?