imported_jjj
Senior member
- Feb 14, 2009
- 660
- 430
- 136
Article right there. Should I have not shared the article with you guys? Have I made an error? I feel I do not have favor in your eyes.
The B&C guy made a guess on Twitter and Wcc turned it into fake news, as they always do.
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/870397480848031746
IMO 799$ makes sense ,if they have at least a couple of higher clocked SKUs, if they manage to get the cheapest mobos to 200$ and if they got no 10 and 14 cores SKUs. That way , one can fit mobo+CPU in 1000$.
If they have 10 and 14 cores SKUs, the pricing distance between SKUs would be too small to fit 16 cores at 799$ so they might have to go with 999$ for the cheapest 16 cores.Ofc in that case, the cheapest 16 cores SKU will be Epyc at lower clocks.