Originally posted by: Shagga
This might be me but I'm finding the Manual a little confusing to be honest and would appreciate some guidance if possible.
I have 3 SATA hard Drives. 2 36GB WD Raptors which will form the RAID 0 setup and 1 200GB Maxtor Plus9 which is also SATA but will be a storage drive.
There are 4 No. SATA connectors on my motherboard. 2 are referenced as SATA_RAID1 and SATA_RAID2 and the other 2 are SATA1 and SATA2. Logic would dictate that the Raptors go on the SATA_RAID connectors and this is what I have done. However, it appears that for this RAID 0 setup it is function of the on-board Promise controller. The RAID support for the SATA1 and SATA2 connections is through the ICH5R chipset. Now I understand this and understand how to set this up in the BIOS (which is V1011).
What I do not understand is that the ?Manual? suggests if I?m reading it correctly that to setup a RAID 0 configuration using SATA drives I should use the ICH5R chipset which is okay, but that means that my SATA Raptors connects to the SATA1 and SATA2 ports on the motherboard and not the SATA_RAID1 and SATA_RAID2 ports as logic would tell ya, or not as the case may be.
So, I guess what I?m asking is this. In the first instance am I better running RAID 0 using the onboard Promise controller or indeed the support given by the ICH5R chipset. And on the basis I am running RAID 0 on SATA does it really matter that it isn't running on ICH5R??
On another note, do I have to install IAA at the time of installing the OS using the F6 method or is there another way. When I try to install IAA as you normally do within WinXP I get an error say "chipset not supported" to words top that effect.
What a tangled wed we weave.
Thanks ppl
Originally posted by: DAVIDS
Originally posted by: Shagga
This might be me but I'm finding the Manual a little confusing to be honest and would appreciate some guidance if possible.
I have 3 SATA hard Drives. 2 36GB WD Raptors which will form the RAID 0 setup and 1 200GB Maxtor Plus9 which is also SATA but will be a storage drive.
There are 4 No. SATA connectors on my motherboard. 2 are referenced as SATA_RAID1 and SATA_RAID2 and the other 2 are SATA1 and SATA2. Logic would dictate that the Raptors go on the SATA_RAID connectors and this is what I have done. However, it appears that for this RAID 0 setup it is function of the on-board Promise controller. The RAID support for the SATA1 and SATA2 connections is through the ICH5R chipset. Now I understand this and understand how to set this up in the BIOS (which is V1011).
What I do not understand is that the ?Manual? suggests if I?m reading it correctly that to setup a RAID 0 configuration using SATA drives I should use the ICH5R chipset which is okay, but that means that my SATA Raptors connects to the SATA1 and SATA2 ports on the motherboard and not the SATA_RAID1 and SATA_RAID2 ports as logic would tell ya, or not as the case may be.
So, I guess what I?m asking is this. In the first instance am I better running RAID 0 using the onboard Promise controller or indeed the support given by the ICH5R chipset. And on the basis I am running RAID 0 on SATA does it really matter that it isn't running on ICH5R??
On another note, do I have to install IAA at the time of installing the OS using the F6 method or is there another way. When I try to install IAA as you normally do within WinXP I get an error say "chipset not supported" to words top that effect.
What a tangled wed we weave.
Thanks ppl
Some people are running RAID 0 on the Promise controller and getting good results. I'm using the ICH5R for my RAID setup because, as another person mentioned, you avoid any possible PCI bottlenecks.
The IAA is installed AFTER you've finished installing your OS. During the F6 process, you need to have a floppy with either the Promise or Intel RAID drivers, depending on which controller you plan to use. If you're going to use the Promise controller, then you won't need the IAA which is specifically designed to support the ICH5R.
Are you are suggesting that by using the ICH5 or ICH5R IDE connectors you avoid the PCI bus? If so, that's simply incorrect. It is true that the ICH5?s hub interface architecture has an improved 'arbitrator' to balance I/O subsystem, PCI and other integrated I/O (SATA, IDE, AC ?97, USB, etc.), to receive the necessary bandwidth for optimal performance.Originally posted by: computer
I don't yet have the mobo, so all I can tell you now is that you want to use the ICH5R connectors first since they are not strangled by the PCI bus. They are going to have more performance than the other SATA connectors.
Originally posted by: senior guy
Are you are suggesting that by using the ICH5 or ICH5R IDE connectors you avoid the PCI bus? If so, that's simply incorrect. It is true that the ICH5?s hub interface architecture has an improved 'arbitrator' to balance I/O subsystem, PCI and other integrated I/O (SATA, IDE, AC ?97, USB, etc.), to receive the necessary bandwidth for optimal performance.Originally posted by: computer
I don't yet have the mobo, so all I can tell you now is that you want to use the ICH5R connectors first since they are not strangled by the PCI bus. They are going to have more performance than the other SATA connectors.
No, that's two totally different things. The ICH5R is not on the PCI bus but the ICH5 is. The P4C800 Deluxe had no ICH5R controller. The P4C800-E Deluxe does. I believe the ICH5 controller is limited to 133mb/sec and the ICH5R is limited to 266mb/sec. Right? Or am I thinking about only the Promise SATA controller (or Si3112A with other mobo's)? I know the Promise & 3112a are on the PCI bus, and I believe the ICH5 is as well. ? At any rate, I know the ICH5R is not limited to the PCI bus.Are you are suggesting that by using the ICH5 or ICH5R IDE connectors you avoid the PCI bus? If so, that's simply incorrect. It is true that the ICH5?s hub interface architecture has an improved 'arbitrator' to balance I/O subsystem, PCI and other integrated I/O (SATA, IDE, AC ?97, USB, etc.), to receive the necessary bandwidth for optimal performance.
Originally posted by: Entragian
Before I even touched my Vcore.. My ethernet connection was slow as can be. I raised it a bit and it seemed to get faster... Example..
Default Vcore = 50 Kilobits/Sec ACK!!!
Vcore of 1.675 = 500+ Kilobits/Sec Ok, this is better. but it should be double that for my cable...
Is there something I am missing? Is this a fluke? I don't understand why raising my Vcore is affecting my on-board LAN.
Originally posted by: MikEHunT2
You are the lucky one!
I too have 1Gb OCZ PC4000 Gold memory, but if i use AI and goto 30%, my memory runs at 3:2 and hance only 173.5 Mhz ffs.
There is a way of doing this, but how the hell i dont know.
How do we change FSB manually?
How do i make sure ratio of 1:1 stays??
Originally posted by: Shagga
I cannot seem to get my digital camera to connect through the USB ports on the front of my case. (Coolermaster ATC) The leads are connected to the motherboard and I have all 8 USB ports enabled in the BIOS. Am I missing something here?
Originally posted by: Shagga
I cannot seem to get my digital camera to connect through the USB ports on the front of my case. (Coolermaster ATC) The leads are connected to the motherboard and I have all 8 USB ports enabled in the BIOS. Am I missing something here?
Originally posted by: Xeon
Hey gang,
I thought I'd give you all an update.
I received all my components on Friday and completed putting the new box together this morning.
Here is what I have:
Case - Thermaltake XASER III V2000A ( SILVER ) 12-Bay All Aluminum ATX Super Tower Chassis w/ Large Side Window and Locks
Memory - OCZ 512 x 2 (1024MB) Enhanced Latency DDR PC-4000 Dual Channel Gold, Model OCZ5001024ELDCGE-K - Retail
Motherboards - Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
Processor - Intel Pentium 4 / 2.4CGHz 512k socket 478 Hyper Threading Technology 800 MHz FSB
Heatsink and cpu Fan - Thermalright SP94 with a Vantec Tornado.
Fan Controllers - Hardcano 9 and a Nexus 305 for the cpu Fan.
PSU - PC Power & Cooling T51DX Turbo-Cool 510 Deluxe
DVD/CD Writer- Plextor PX-708A
Hardrive - WD Raptor 36 Gig
Graphics Card - Nvidia Quadro2 - 400
I got it all up and running but I haven't Installed all the drivers yet. Once I do I'll then look at what it's clocking at and begin my o'clocking experience.
I do have a couple of questions for you guys however. I'm finding that the hardest part about putting a new box together is handling all the wiring. If any of you have some good pictures of how you routed all your wiring I'd love to see it. I want it to be super clean and tidy so if you have such a box and wouldn't mind sharing your layout with me, please send them to me via e-mail. xeon (at) xshellr8 (dot) com
Second, I'd like to get everyone's feedback on their Core cpu temps. Since most of you are running a similiar setup here in this thread I'd like to find out what your idle core cpu temeratures are running as well as the temp's your seeing under load.
Thanks guys!
BTW, I have to tell you, I wouldn't even have half the setup that I do without all of you helping me out with making my decisions for hardware. You've all been a big help in making this thing go together without a hitch.
I'll be posting pictures of this setup once I have it all cleaned up (wiring etc.).
See ya
Originally posted by: jcpiercy
Im working on my first build as well Xeon
Im using a Asus P4C 800 Deluxe and a KingWin 436 black case
Enermax 450 watt PSU and a P4 2.4 800 fsb
This photo , I found on a forum , gave me a few ideas
( not my machine BTW )
A Clean Wiring Job
JP