Hell with infantry weapons, these maps will be great for RPG spamming!
Battlefield 3: Close Quarters Gameplay Premiere Trailer
(Next DLC due in June)
Related Blog Post : Close Quarters Gameplay Trailer
Ill be the fool sniping, but going positive on the KDR most of the time. Loved doing that on Shipment and Killhouse and freaking everyone out. :biggrin:This wouldn't be too bad if there was no noob tubes, rpgs, frag rounds, etc, or if people didn't spam them like little bit****. LMGs will be a problem as well. Oh well, I look forward to breaking out the M1014 and 870 with tact lights!
Hell with infantry weapons, these maps will be great for RPG spamming!
I want Dual Berettas for all those indoor CQB maps = Chow Yun-Fat style! :twisted:
Single pistols are not going to cut it!
NAY!Ooo you inspire me sir! I want, nay, need! Dual-RPGs!! I will call it the double fists of God! :twisted:
This wouldn't be too bad if there was no noob tubes, rpgs, frag rounds, etc, or if people didn't spam them like little bit****. LMGs will be a problem as well. Oh well, I look forward to breaking out the M1014 and 870 with tact lights!
Ill be the fool sniping, but going positive on the KDR most of the time. Loved doing that on Shipment and Killhouse and freaking everyone out. :biggrin:
NAY!
It shall be called double fisted noobishness! :biggrin:
I bet you wish for tac lights and lasers to go on your RPGs too. LOL
So I wonder if this new gameplay mode will be CTF since the maps will be smaller and indoors?
With my luck, yes. And DICE will only implement it for small, vehicle-less, maps.
I'd still take CTF on the new maps vs no CTF at all.
Oh cr@p, I didn't think of that. It's going to be tac light heaven (or nightmare?). You're going to spend most of the time on these maps with those lights in your face, blinded by them. Great.
What would be fun, is one of these new maps with pistols only. (Whether the g18 can be used is up for debate.)
On graw and graw2 we used to set up matches where you could only use one type of weapon. Some times it was explosives only, sometimes pistols only. The pistol only battles were a lot of fun. And being pistols (that couldn't kill you from halfway across the map like can happen in bf3) forced up close and personal engagement. If dice wants up close and personal, that would do it.
Yeah, its too bad server admins don't have the ability to limit weapons and accessories. If the server is unranked, you should have the ability to do it.
Hey look...I encountered my first hacker! Everyone would just instadie by EOD bot. He kept coming back over and over:
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/user/ci101010101/
he has zero score or kills with anything but 500 EOD bot kills. -_-
Well, actually, here's the problem. I don't think servers should be allowed to limit weapons in any way on ranked servers.
Thats why I specified this should be ok on unranked.
Well, actually, here's the problem. I don't think servers should be allowed to limit weapons in any way on ranked servers. HOWEVER, if servers were allowed to make it so that certain weapons cannot even be spawned with, that would be acceptable. What we have now is a situation where the game allows you to spawn with the weapons, allows you to use the weapons, and then the corrupt servers swoop in and ban you for doing it.
If DICE is going to allow the servers to do this stuff, they should give the servers the tools that allow them to prevent players from even spawning with them. But the game allowing people to do something and then players get banned for it isn't right.
Also, it has recently come to my attention that a lot of players don't like large maps because they don't like vehicle rape, since large maps have jets and tanks and rapecopters. So, I think servers should have the ability to have large maps that have transport vehicles only, ie, quadbikes, humvees, transport choppers with weak door guns, unarmed APCs.
corrupt? wtf is your problem? so entitled
those servers HEAVILY advertise the rules and warn people first, you act like they pretend to be vanilla then ban you out of nowhere
if people are that stupid to go ahead and keep doing it after being warned they deserve the banning
almost as bad as the DRCU guys and don7bl1nk complaining about servers(WHO ADVERTISE) that they have high tickets, not running stock tickets
yes they used to.....didnt bf2 have that?
Well, actually, here's the problem. I don't think servers should be allowed to limit weapons in any way on ranked servers. HOWEVER, if servers were allowed to make it so that certain weapons cannot even be spawned with, that would be acceptable. What we have now is a situation where the game allows you to spawn with the weapons, allows you to use the weapons, and then the corrupt servers swoop in and ban you for doing it.
If DICE is going to allow the servers to do this stuff, they should give the servers the tools that allow them to prevent players from even spawning with them. But the game allowing people to do something and then players get banned for it isn't right.
Also, it has recently come to my attention that a lot of players don't like large maps because they don't like vehicle rape, since large maps have jets and tanks and rapecopters. So, I think servers should have the ability to have large maps that have transport vehicles only, ie, quadbikes, humvees, transport choppers with weak door guns, unarmed APCs.
Honestly, they need to balance vehicles, period. No way should I be able to shoot at a helicopter w/ the AA vehicle for 3-4 seconds only to have them turn their attention on me and kill me with a salvo of rockets. Helis are ridiculously overpowered, and especially if you consider that engis can heal them inside and still launch missiles as well as the health regen and amount of ways to avoid stingers.
A lot of people point out that unranked status is a death sentence in most cases, because so many people won't play them without stat collection due to BF3's insanely long unlock system.
That works, but I usually just run with an 8x and quick or no-scope.You mean like in bc2, using the m95 with red dot?
maniacalpha1-1 said:BF2 did not have it at far as I know, unless it was a plugin that I never saw used.
The Battlefield ROE clearly states that weapon usage cannot be limited. EA does not enforce the rule but it's there and therefore can be used to describe the servers as corrupt. Warning people well in advance of an ROE breaking rule doesn't mean it suddenly becomes compliant with ROE.
High ticket servers, on the other hand, are not against ROE, and so, you have a point as far those complaints go.
Also, this is old but here is a clip of EA top brass talking about microtransactions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR6-u...layer_embedded
That works, but I usually just run with an 8x and quick or no-scope.
Those ROE's are ridiculous, if I am paying for a server then I should be able to run it however I darn well please.
And the day they add microtransactions is the day I quit.
Honestly, they need to balance vehicles, period. No way should I be able to shoot at a helicopter w/ the AA vehicle for 3-4 seconds only to have them turn their attention on me and kill me with a salvo of rockets. Helis are ridiculously overpowered, and especially if you consider that engis can heal them inside and still launch missiles as well as the health regen and amount of ways to avoid stingers.