Official AT NFL Free Agent Tracking, Draft, and Offseason Happenings Thread

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
145
106
www.neftastic.com
Don't need Forte? I think there isn't a team in the league that couldn't use Forte. Who do the Patriots have at RB for next year?

I think Michael Bush could carry the load for two years at least. The Bears could draft a replacement during that time.

Here's to hoping he just wasn't ready for it last season - yeah he started strong but he faded fast.
 

woodman1999

Golden Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,697
106
106
Don't need Forte? I think there isn't a team in the league that couldn't use Forte. Who do the Patriots have at RB for next year?

I think Michael Bush could carry the load for two years at least. The Bears could draft a replacement during that time.

I am actually happy with Ridley, Vereen, and Woodhead at RB. We also picked up Addai, but that one I don't really care about.

I know the first two are only going to be in their second year, but I'd like to see what they've got, since each showed some promise last season when they got the chance.

And I don't think Welker is done with us after this year. Mankins was thought to be done, but he got resigned to a nice long-term deal as well. This is just how that Pats operate.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,461
82
86
I was watching some old films and came across this, and I thought "man, this guy is prophetic".



Yeah, it's a Giants' hat, but still...
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
.24? I'm surprised he could even start the friggin car. Thankfully, he didn't kill anyone.

Yeah, second time at such a young age, he's got some issues.
 

crashtestdummy

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2010
2,893
0
0
Pats swipe Jake Ballard off waivers. The Giants had hoped that he'd make it through waivers so they could put him on IR, but the Pats grabbed him. Shrewd move:

Now, Ballard had ACL and micro-fracture surgery in February. He would have to have an amazing recovery to be ready by November. The most likely scenario is he's out for the entire season.

If he doesn't play, Ballard, would be an exclusive rights free agent again in 2013 and only a minimum tender from the Patriots would keep him on the team. He wouldn't be a restricted free agent until '14, and wouldn't be eligible for unrestricted free agency until '15.


The Pats need a third TE on their team in case Gronk or Hernandez go down (as happened in the Superbowl). While he won't play this year, he'll make an excellent backup next year.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
145
106
www.neftastic.com
Pats swipe Jake Ballard off waivers. The Giants had hoped that he'd make it through waivers so they could put him on IR, but the Pats grabbed him. Shrewd move:




The Pats need a third TE on their team in case Gronk or Hernandez go down (as happened in the Superbowl). While he won't play this year, he'll make an excellent backup next year.

Don't the pats already have like 7 TE's on the roster before this pickup?

This is nothing but a spite/vengeance play by Billy. Nothing more, nothing less.
 

Via

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2009
4,695
4
0
I'm wondering why the Bears didn't claim him; they need a long-term talent at TE desperately.

Proabably the Giants thought they had a wink-wink with the rest of the league.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
I'm wondering why the Bears didn't claim him; they need a long-term talent at TE desperately.

Proabably the Giants thought they had a wink-wink with the rest of the league.

Because the Bears understand that, what goes around, comes around.

The Patriots can no longer try to "sneak" someone through waivers as every team in the league is probably looking to teach them a lesson.

That being said, the league really needs to address this. Such unwritten wink-wink understandings are dishonest and violate the spirit of the rules.

MotionMan
 
Nov 3, 2004
10,491
22
81
I'm wondering why the Bears didn't claim him; they need a long-term talent at TE desperately.

Proabably the Giants thought they had a wink-wink with the rest of the league.

Jake Ballard is a long-term talent at TE? He's adequate I suppose, but he's also on a torn ACL. There are reasons why a team like the Bears wouldn't claim him, I would think.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81

Dirigible

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2006
5,961
30
91
You keep being a grinch, MM. My heart will continue to be warmed by such gestures.



Oh, and I read that mmqb when it came out and thought of you.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
You keep being a grinch, MM. My heart will continue to be warmed by such gestures.



Oh, and I read that mmqb when it came out and thought of you.

Please find me an article by someone has well-respected as King that supports these ridiculous one-day-contract-retire-as-a-whatever, and I will be happy to reevaluate my position.

MotionMan
 

Dirigible

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2006
5,961
30
91
Nah. I'm just as happy with you being a grinch. I feel no need to convince anyone I'm right.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
Nah. I'm just as happy with you being a grinch. I feel no need to convince anyone I'm right.

I am in no way a grinch. There is nothing that says that the retirement press conference at their old teams offices. At the conference they can say they were always a whatever in their hearts an all that. I just think the act of signing a 1 day contact is useless and cheapens the moment.

I am not sure why you find it so important to continue to support your clearly incorrect position at the risk of getting this thread locked?

MotionMan
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |