[OFFICIAL] Bulldozer Reviews Thread - AnandTech Review Posted

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,425
8,388
126
Intel didn't have a net burst moment. It's not like they had a sudden onset of sanity. Banias was in the pipeline the whole time. Once net burst could no longer be sustained, they switched over.

AMD has no Banias to fall back on. They put all their eggs in the bulldozer basket.

given how long it took intel to pop banias out after it was apparent that netburst would never be a good mobile chip, i'm going to disagree. everything i've seen indicates that banias was an emergency project.

Not talking about paying for the actual electricity, but rather the need to buy a considerably higher-output power supply vs. an equally-configured Intel box.

where the hell are you buying your power supplies? extremely overpowered supplies are available all the time for under $100.
 
Last edited:

theevilsharpie

Platinum Member
Nov 2, 2009
2,322
14
81
I have a hard time beliewing this is the thing for the server side, but looking forward for the Johan review.

In the server room, AMD is squaring off against Intel's 8- and 10-core Xeons which are substantially faster in multi-threaded applications than Intel's quad-core desktop chips while still retaining a 130W TDP. AMD hasn't been competitive in the server space for a while, and I don't see that changing with Bulldozer.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Not talking about paying for the actual electricity, but rather the need to buy a considerably higher-output power supply vs. an equally-configured Intel box.

Really just a 2500k with a moderate air overclock hands BD it's ass in virtually everything, and spending an extra $30-$40 for a quality PSU that will handle the extra 200+w of load for an OC'd BD is just insane.

It's more complicated than that. A lower end $120-130 board with 6-8 power phases may not to be enough to allow you to overclock Bulldozer to 4.6-4.8ghz for a 24/7 100&#37; load operation. Also, I can't see any <$40 cooler outside of Macho HR-02 being able to handle such hgih power consumption at reasonable noise levels.

where the hell are you buying your power supplies? extremely overpowered supplies are available all the time for under $100.

Hardware Canucks review shows spikes to 800W with a GTX460 1GB GPU [post 227]

Which sub-$100 quality PSUs can deal with such a load?

PC Power & Cooling 950W - $130
Antec 850W - $175
LEPA 900W - $180
Corsair 850W - $190
Enermax 900W - $200
Seasonic 850 - $210

But that's cutting it pretty close. What if you want to have an overclocked HD6950 / GTX570/580? I mean even if BD had equal performance to 2600k, 200W+ greater power consumption in overclocked states is a deal breaker.
 
Last edited:

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested/11

no wonder power consumption is that high :'(

AMD had to patch Win 7 and bring new apps along the FX release or,
Postpone the FX line for a year along with Win 8 launch and release a 32nm 8 core Thuban today

I thought about that few month back, if Windows would actually recognize modules or not (it does "know" about HT). I'm not sure if I actually asked JF_AMD about it back then in one off those 1000 BD threads. But this is so FAIL. I mean they worked 5 years on this thing and not a single person talked to Microsoft or thought about scheduling in general? Just EPIC FAIL...because even for me it was obvious the approach AMD chose heavily depends on cpu scheduling.

Are there any benches on Linux? maybe it performs better there (or even worse).

Are those 994 Mio transistors in SB for the cores only or do they include the GPU? If yes, that would make it even sicker. More than double the transistors for less performance.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
where the hell are you buying your power supplies? extremely overpowered supplies are available all the time for under $100.

Well, considering that you can find decent 500w-level PSUs for $40 or less, and decent 650-700W PSUs are considerably more expensive, I'm not sure what you mean?

The point was that if you had this hypothetical build comparison :

Intel 2500k vs. BD 8150, both to be air overclocked to reasonable limits,

+ AMD 6950 2GB + 8GB DDR3 + 2TB WD Black + 128GB SSD + DVDRW/BD + A few fans ..

Then the BD build is going to demand a PSU probably on the range of $30-$40 more to be reasonable.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Power supplies are cheap as hell no matter what.




Heat. Another thing I don't care about.

Hahaha I think you're just trolling us.

Hot? Needs more expensive power supply? Slow? Sucks more juice?

NONE OF THIS MATTERS! I WANT A SLOWER SYSTEM DAMNIT!

lol
 

cebalrai

Senior member
May 18, 2011
250
0
0
Hahaha I think you're just trolling us.

Hot? Needs more expensive power supply? Slow? Sucks more juice?

NONE OF THIS MATTERS! I WANT A SLOWER SYSTEM DAMNIT!

lol

And for some reason you refuse to acknowledge where I said I'd consider getting one if the priced dropped. You mysteriously keep forgetting to mention what I actually said when you make your little caricatures of my comments.
 

skipsneeky2

Diamond Member
May 21, 2011
5,035
1
71
And for some reason you refuse to acknowledge where I said I'd consider getting one if the priced dropped. You mysteriously keep forgetting to mention what I actually said when you make your little caricatures of my comments.

This guy is on his high horse be on the look out hes gonna defend Bulldozer to the death .

Honestly unless your rocking a dual core amd ...there is NOT a damn thing appealing about this...the overpriced x4 980 appeals to me more then this and that says a lot .
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,548
2,545
146
wow what a bummer. pitty.
 

cebalrai

Senior member
May 18, 2011
250
0
0
This guy is on his high horse be on the look out hes gonna defend Bulldozer to the death .

Honestly unless your rocking a dual core amd ...there is NOT a damn thing appealing about this...the overpriced x4 980 appeals to me more then this and that says a lot .


Because I said I might get one if it was cheaper I'm "defending Bulldozer to the death"?

You don't think you're twisting what I said just a little?
 

PreferLinux

Senior member
Dec 29, 2010
420
0
0
I thought about that few month back, if Windows would actually recognize modules or not (it does "know" about HT). I'm not sure if I actually asked JF_AMD about it back then in one off those 1000 BD threads. But this is so FAIL. I mean they worked 5 years on this thing and not a single person talked to Microsoft or thought about scheduling in general? Just EPIC FAIL...because even for me it was obvious the approach AMD chose heavily depends on cpu scheduling.

Are there any benches on Linux? maybe it performs better there (or even worse).

Are those 994 Mio transistors in SB for the cores only or do they include the GPU? If yes, that would make it even sicker. More than double the transistors for less performance.
There would be if AMD bothered to send hardware to the only reviewer that uses Linux...
 

skipsneeky2

Diamond Member
May 21, 2011
5,035
1
71
Because I said I might get one if it was cheaper I'm "defending Bulldozer to the death"?

You don't think you're twisting what I said just a little?

1100t is cheaper and half the time performs as good if not better...i understand you will buy it if its cheaper but how cheap ?

$150 is a fair market value at best anything lower is a pipe dream .
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
About scheduling. This is funny:

See:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=31153334&postcount=255
The OS doesn't know about modules, it only sees cores. But all cores are physical cores, so it won't matter.
and
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=31164371&postcount=287
So, here's the deal - we are obviously working with the OS and app vendors
It's noteworthy that the guy quoted in that post foresaw possible issues with scheduling. AMD obviously thought otherwise...
 

onethreehill

Member
Aug 18, 2011
193
0
0
Anyone interested in these reviews? :biggrin:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=831&Itemid=63
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/10/12/amd-fx-8150-review/1
http://www.bjorn3d.com/articles/AMD_FX-8150_CPU_Bulldozer/2125.html
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/prozessoren/2011/test-amd-bulldozer/
http://extrahardware.cnews.cz/amd-fx-8150-6100-bulldozer-zambezi-recenze-test?page=0,3
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150-processor-review/
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/10/11/amd_bulldozer_fx8150_desktop_performance_review
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/10/11/amd_bulldozer_fx8150_gameplay_performance_review/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...5-amd-bulldozer-fx-8150-processor-review.html
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/842-1/amd-fx-8150-fx-6100-bulldozer-debarque-am3.html
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...sor-vs-core-i7-2600k-review-introduction.html
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/32110-amd-bulldozer-fx-8150/
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews/processors/13752
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-FX8150-8Core-Processor-Review-Bulldozer-Has-Landed/
http://www.kitguru.net/components/c...ition-8-core-review-with-gigabyte-990fxa-ud7/
http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8150fx_8120fx_6100_and_fx_4170,1.html
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/1/
http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102&Itemid=1
http://www.madshrimps.be/articles/article/1000220/AMD-FX-8150-Bulldozer-CPU-review#axzz1aKr1ZQF4
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/amd_fx-8150/
http://www.overclockers.com/amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-processor-review
http://www.ozeros.com/2011/10/review-amd-bulldozer-fx-8150/
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Proces...ssor-Review-Can-Bulldozer-Unearth-AMD-Victory
http://pctuning.tyden.cz/hardware/p...procesory-fx-8150-a-8120-v-testu-1-2?start=14
http://www.pureoverclock.com/article1376.html
http://techreport.com/articles.x/21813
http://www.techspot.com/review/452-amd-bulldozer-fx-cpus/
http://www.techstation.it/hardware/articoli/amd-fx-il-ritorno-al-vertice/introduzione
http://www.techwarelabs.com/amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-8-core-cpu/
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/4348/amd_fx_8150_am3_3_6ghz_bulldozer_cpu_review/index.html
http://www.vortez.net/articles_pages/amd_fx_8150_bulldozer_cpu_review,1.html
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-8150-cpu-overclocking-review-a-bulldozer-for-gamers-/13694-1.html
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-...vestigation--feeding-the-bulldozer/13704.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8150.html
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
About scheduling. This is funny:

See:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=31153334&postcount=255

and
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=31164371&postcount=287

It's noteworthy that the guy quoted in that post foresaw possible issues with scheduling. AMD obviously thought otherwise...

To be fair, JF-AMD is just a marketing guy, not an engineer. I'm sure the engineers and other guys working on the technical side of things were well aware of the scheduling issue. Just because John wasn't doesn't mean that AMD didn't know or care about the issue.
 

dualsmp

Golden Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,626
44
91
Man this is like P4, just worse - what a let down for competition and future development. Is the prefetcher working - damn. I have a hard time beliewing this is the thing for the server side, but looking forward for the Johan review.

I think like you said this is actually worse than the P4. By the time the P4 Northwood was on 800Mhz bus it was actually competitive at the time and hyperthreading eventually panned out.

Maybe the only comparison is Prescott. It was hot, didn't perform much better than the Northwood and was quite a bit more expensive. I'm not sure that AMD can recover from this mistake though unlike Intel.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |