[OFFICIAL] Bulldozer Reviews Thread - AnandTech Review Posted

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

drizek

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,410
0
71
Their mistake selling 990x and 990fx motherboards before the release of its featured to come processor.

The value deduction isn't gonna make many now 990fx owners feel any better the selling point to me was the support of sli...two gtx580s for example with a 8150 can you just imagine the power it would pull?

It would be a furnace .

Yes, I blew my power budget with my sli 460s. I have a 550w psu and the two cards will peak at around 400w. Doesn't leave much toom for this failure of a CPU.
 

DeeDot78

Member
Jul 29, 2011
77
0
0
Their mistake selling 990x and 990fx motherboards before the release of its featured to come processor.

The value deduction isn't gonna make many now 990fx owners feel any better the selling point to me was the support of sli...two gtx580s for example with a 8150 can you just imagine the power it would pull?

It would be a furnace .

Amd is effectively left with no processor that wouldn't bottleneck two gtx580's. For the extreme gamer, with dual gpus, amd isnt a viable alternative.
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
Yes, I blew my power budget with my sli 460s. I have a 550w psu and the two cards will peak at around 400w. Doesn't leave much toom for this failure of a CPU.
two over clocked gtx460s can easily consume well over 400 watts all by themselves.
 

v220

Junior Member
Aug 28, 2011
1
0
66
Nice review in polish:
http://www.purepc.pl/procesory/test_amd_fx8150_bulldozer_kontra_intel_sandy_bridge?page=0,0
Google translate:
http://translate.google.com/transla..._bulldozer_kontra_intel_sandy_bridge?page=0,0

List of processors participating in the tests:
AMD FX-8150
AMD FX-6100 - Simulation
AMD FX-4170 - Simulation
AMD FX-4100 - Simulation
AMD-3850 A8
Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II X4 955
Phenom II X3 740
Phenom II X2 555
Core i7 2600k
Core i5 2500K
Core i3 2100
Pentium G840
Core i7 875K
Core i5 760
Core i5 661
Core i3 560
 

Hypertag

Member
Oct 12, 2011
148
0
0
Isnt it amazing that BD is 2 billion transistors and cannot compete with a 1.16 billion transistor Intel CPU?

Thats how bad it is. They should abort the whole thing right now.

Note that the 1.16 billion transistor Intel CPU has a gigantic integrated GPU eating its transistor budget.
 

DeeDot78

Member
Jul 29, 2011
77
0
0
Nice review in polish:
http://www.purepc.pl/procesory/test_amd_fx8150_bulldozer_kontra_intel_sandy_bridge?page=0,0
Google translate:
http://translate.google.com/transla..._bulldozer_kontra_intel_sandy_bridge?page=0,0

List of processors participating in the tests:
AMD FX-8150
AMD FX-6100 - Simulation
AMD FX-4170 - Simulation
AMD FX-4100 - Simulation
AMD-3850 A8
Phenom II X6 1090T
Phenom II X4 955
Phenom II X3 740
Phenom II X2 555
Core i7 2600k
Core i5 2500K
Core i3 2100
Pentium G840
Core i7 875K
Core i5 760
Core i5 661
Core i3 560

8150 is Almost 400w overclocked! That's insane.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
AMD were right about not releasing early benchmarks in fear of cannibilizing their current sales. Except it wouldnt have been due to a halt of Phenom II sales because of people holding off buying and waiting for BD causing a backlog of unsellable inventory, but for people realizing that BD wasn't worth waiting for and buying SB.

That's exactly right. I was waiting for BD before I upgraded, but my choices were either a BD or an i7 -- no Phenoms. Then the June launch was pushed into August. When the rumored August launch was pushed to October, I knew BD was very likely going to be a turd so I went ahead and bought an i7-2600K and board. It looks like my only mistake was not upgrading a few months earlier.
 

skipsneeky2

Diamond Member
May 21, 2011
5,035
1
71
Amd is effectively left with no processor that wouldn't bottleneck two gtx580's. For the extreme gamer, with dual gpus, amd isnt a viable alternative.

I wanted to say this also but had no physical proof or sli benchmarks but yes a excellent point:thumbsup:
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,567
152
106
Ugh, a bit worse and better than I thought. Didn't think it'd slot in between the 2500k and 2600k in heavily multi threaded apps, but didn't think it'd lose to Phenom II in single threaded apps. Was figuring its single threading perf was going to be slightly higher, and the multi threading perf slightly lower. The power consumption is also insane. As such, this CPU is almost worthless for me. Getting a 2500k in a week.
 

jacktesterson

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
5,493
3
81
I'm a 990FX board owner.... and probably still would have bought a 8150 after reviews today as I really do not want the hassel of taking apart my rig again... and for gaming, it still offers enough performance.

I am just sickened about the Power Consumption of a Overclocked bulldozer. It makes SLI/Crossfire setups require insane power supplies. I can't support BD. Piledriver, you better work on efficiency big time.

Sticking to the Thuban core for this generation.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
8150 is Almost 400w overclocked! That's insane.

Overclocking an FX-8150 is like taking an overclocked 2500k and adding an HD6950 2GB as a cherry on top of it.



Looks like the market for $70+ supercoolers is back!! Thermalright, Prolimatech, Noctua must be having an office party today
 

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
Overclocking an FX-8150 is like taking an overclocked 2500k and adding an HD6950 2GB as a cherry on top of it.

Looks like the market for $70+ supercoolers is back!! Thermalright, Prolimatech, Noctua must be having an office party today

Extra 170W for FX-4170 to match a i3-2100 in gaming? YES please!
 

jacktesterson

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
5,493
3
81
Screw it. I'm disapointed, but I wanted a new CPU and don't want old tech... My system was built for BD and I don't want to tear it apart and lose money on ebay.

I think I may still go with it. Debating. the 1035T is a fill in.
 
Last edited:

nanaki333

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2002
3,772
13
81
i don't see them!

i see the 6100 at microcenter. i want an 8120 to play with though.
 
Last edited:

jacktesterson

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
5,493
3
81
Screw it. I'm disapointed, but I wanted a new CPU and don't want old tech... My system was built for BD and I don't want to tear it apart and lose money on ebay.

I think I may still go with it. Debating. the 1035T is a fill in.



Just pulled the trigger... Just ordered a FX-8120. New toy to play with.

I waited this long and had my system built and ready for it.

I have a big PSU and don't care about my power bill.

I pulled the trigger. For some reason I'm still happy to be finally getting one to tinker with.

Decided in the end I'd rather have newer tech than old.
 

DeeDot78

Member
Jul 29, 2011
77
0
0
Just pulled the trigger... Just ordered a FX-8120. New toy to play with.

I waited this long and had my system built and ready for it.

I have a big PSU and don't care about my power bill.

I pulled the trigger. For some reason I'm still happy to be finally getting one to tinker with.

Decided in the end I'd rather have newer tech than old.

If you couldn't get your 1035 to 4ghz, why not. You got the PSU. I just couldn't with my 1090t at 4.1ghz.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
If I were an AMD fan, I would also be worried about their 7000 series GPU's that were delayed. Something is going on there.

Anyways crap like this release is what made me jump off the AMD fanboy wagon years ago.
 

richierich1212

Platinum Member
Jul 5, 2002
2,741
360
126
What I don't get is even with overclocking there is hardly any performance increase from stock. *scratches head*. Mind boggling.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
What I don't get is even with overclocking there is hardly any performance increase from stock. *scratches head*. Mind boggling.

We saw the same thing when Netburst was at the end of its rope. Not a lot of gains from 3 to 4ghz. Some architechtures just don't scale well.

The fact that even to start with the scaling is poor is a terrible sign.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |