Nik
Lifer
- Jun 5, 2006
- 16,101
- 2
- 56
80x80? Are you freaking kidding? 100x100 is small and there's more than enough room with the rest of the garbage packed into the left-hand ID pane to warrant more than 80x80. Since AT won't be hosting the avatars, I don't see the problem with normal size avatars. It's not like AT's bandwidth is going to suffer or something.
This is what I want for an avatar, I made it expressly to use on AT:
booooo transparent backgrounds don't work
I made mine by matching the vb skin lavender and replacing the transparent part with that.
I made mine by matching the vb skin lavender and replacing the transparent part with that.
Okay, I'm digging the custom avatars. Really, it's a good idea.
But why do the mods get to have a bigger avatar? oldsmoboat's flag is mos def not 80x80.
Okay, I'm digging the custom avatars. Really, it's a good idea.
But why do the mods get to have a bigger avatar? oldsmoboat's flag is mos def not 80x80.
I think Nik's proposal is fair. 100x100 is not going to cramp up the left side of the screen. I don't know how it's going to affect bandwidth, but I hope it will at least get some consideration from the higher ups.
booooo transparent backgrounds don't work
I didn't say anything. :whiste:Keep complaining and I'll let Admins and Mods have animated avatars, just to piss you off some more. :biggrin::biggrin:
Slow start but on a roll with vb now.