If you have a 4k TV with hdmi 2.0, how do you hook a fury card to it?
I really don't know. Do these TV's have Display ports?
You mean people don't know about cheap DP to DVI cables? Say it isn't so!
You mean people don't know about cheap DP to DVI cables? Say it isn't so!
DP and DVI are incompatible. You need an active adapter to do it.
I'm interested in the whole package though so want to see overclocking potential as well. I've seen what the Gigabyte aftermarket 980ti does at 1500mhz and it's about 15% over the stock performance of that card and consumes about 300W once overclocked. That is about the benchmark area I want to see Fury X exceed with overclocking. I haven't used AMD in a while, but in the past they had much more liberal voltage controls compared to the paltry amounts nvidia gives these days. It's really down to how the card does at stock and how much gas is left in the tank after that.
Really? 4096 shaders, 512GB/sec and > 1050mhz clocks and you expect it to not beat a reference 980Ti? 980Ti is less than 40% faster at 4K and on specs Fury X is at least faster than a 290X:
http://www.techpowerup.com/mobile/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti/31.html
The key variable is OC vs. OC performance. 980Ti is a beast with 20-30% more performance once OC.
I saw a few cheap ones (~$15), but its single link 1080p.
The active dual-link ones required for higher res/hz are more expensive, you are right.
https://jayvee.com.au/accell-displa...ctive-dual-link-adapter-with-3d-120hz-support
Definitely the added cost will be a major factor for some on DL-DVI 1440p monitors.
No HDMI 2.0 or DVI. That alienates quite a few people out there with Korean IPS panels.
Looks like 980ti is only 15% faster after an extreme overclock according to Grooveriding.
Probably 15~20% after driver optimizations & discounting Gimpworks penaltyDirect from AMD. Real world I am thinking 5-10% faster on average across a game suite.
LOL @ all the people going crazy about the HDMI thing. Don't AIB's often choose their own I/O anyways?
It hasn't been confirmed yet, so there's still hope,I think the Display controller has to support it, so even though the AIB's can mix and match connectors they won't have the hdmi 2.0 option there.
The weird thing is that maxwell has had it for 9 months so it was just expected. I think it will be a bigger deal for the Nano as thats an ideal HTPC card with 2.0 but not without it.
So Fury X is not being positioned against Titan X?
Symbolism.Why? 980Ti is basically Titan X for cheap. It would be silly to compare against its fake competitor.
The 980Ti and custom ones is what it has to compete against.
They're showing their card off, and they turned mantle off in BF4?
That's a bold move.
The article mentions hdmi port is 1.4 and cant push 60hz on 4k. Bad news for 4k tv owners I guess.[/QUOTE]
The HDMI 1.4 is puzzling, to be sure. For a card positioned as a 4K performer, to miss this is pretty bad.
For me personally, its not a limiting factor, but for someone who just invested in a 4K TV its not great.
pics or GTFO
But seriously, do you have a source for this? It's obvious it doesn't have DVI (adapters are easy to come by), but it would be incredibly stupid of them not to include HDMI 2.0 on a card targeting 4K gaming.:/
Not having HDMI 2.0+ is a deal breaker, so this needs confirmation. :/