Originally posted by: Elitebull
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Taking that into consideration I decided to relax a bit as I watched the movie, try to enjoy the fight scenes to the fullest extent and I pity those who don't like them just because they look to CGI of which they don't because I bet you couldn't tell a CGI Smith next to the real smith in the fight scene with 100 smiths. the only reason it looked fake was because there were so many Smiths that looked completely identical and Neo was doing impossible feats, put those two together and our mind cannot relate such a thing as being completely possible. Had they made 99.9% perfect clones of Hugo Weaving (Agent Smith) and had all 100 fight right infront of you you wouldn't think that it looked real either, especially if they were moving faster and jumping higher than humanly possible.
You're reaching and I disagree. Quite frankly the CGI at parts of this movie was subpar. We've seen better in star wars and lord of the rings. If you still don't believe that parts of the CGI were subpar you can load up the reloaded trailer that shows one of the agents on the highway scene as he jumps on the hood of a car. It goes slow motion and if you can't see the cartoonish aspect to the character your eyes need to be checked. I've seen better and you've seen better.
Good CGI for the 100 smiths may have been difficult with all that was going on but it could have been done. However, excusing that there is simply no reason for the agent on the hood of that car to look so bad. It was the worst CGI I've seen in recent times and utterly unacceptable for a movie of this supposed caliber and budget. Check out the trailer if you need reminding. Then go watch lord of the rings - perhaps the cave troll in LOTR1 or those orc-dogs in LOTR2. The contrast is huge. The scene was rushed and I am surprised it was let through on Matrix R.
It's easier to pick out unrealistic aspects when the 3d model is of a human... have you ever seen an orc-dog in person? I'll admit some of the movement was a little awkward, like the way the agents bounced back after being hit by the neo, but the detail on the faces were amazing. After an awkward movement, it'd focus on the face, which then seemed like they fused clips of animation with live-motion segments when in reality, it's all computer generated.
lol yea. i don't get why people still don't understand that the more grotesque you make a cg or any fx character, the easier it is for it to be believable. think anime. then think of trying to draw photorealistically, any small defect would totally piss u off. the lotr monsters were grotesque, gollem is like an old corpse, not much more then a freakier dobbie. remember the long shots in lotr of gandalf and crew running around in the caves and such? so fake it was embarrassing, i thought i was watching a 3/4 overhead view of a video game with little characters and their repetitive walk cycles. and that was with it zoomed so far out u coulnd't really see their faces. i seriously doubt anyone could tell which smiths were human, i couldn't really tell. of course it looks "fake", its in the matrix with its weird lighting and the sheer number is unbelievable. not to mention they all look the same which of course screams unreality to human minds. their strength/movement is insane as it should be. just look at the first one, its not quite realistic either, kind of too clean or too set like enviroments.
and seriously that guy gives lotr too much credit. there were so many obviously fake scenes in those movies. worst of all being the blue screened trees of course. at other times the trees looked like stop motion. gandalf falling in the hole..total cg. however notice the fire monster looked "real".
i remember they found the exact same thing in robotics. when making interactive "robots" with faces, they found the closer they got to human the more grotesque it really looked. all the slight imperfections looked horrifying. think rubber face stretched over motors and stuff saying stuff to u which it being "not quite right".
much easier going with say a real monster or fluffy cartoon animal/person kinda look.
certainly better then atoc where even the storm troopers looked cg, and they have plastic helmets covering their entire head. good lord.
and yea, i have doubts about the emp explanation. seems unlikely trinity and crew were just outside the range