heh, two straight posts being a pedo-U apologist and a domestic violence apologist. But hey! You and your kind are empowered now! Things are looking up the next 4 years for you people!
(but yeah, I don't like piling on the Mixon dude 2 years after the fact if he has served his time/depending on how he dealt with things and made amends. ...but I don't know enough about the dude. Crap, I need to explain this to you because you won't get it: you are mad that the media isn't "fairly" explaining that she hit him first, which justifies his haymaker in your childish, ignorant mind. I'm criticizing the media pillorying an individual after their chance to reform. I look forward to your 2nd grade attempt to call me a hypocrite, though)
You really have just become someone who trolls ignorantly anymore.
Nobody is left, or went unpunished who committed the terrible acts at Penn St. It is hardly being a rape apologist. There isn't a rapist player or staff members, I corrected him. But I guess you're ok with calling people rapist just because, huh? Punishing a team forever for something they had nothing to do with is silly. Funny that you are upset at the media for not allowing the second chance of Mixon, yet don't want Penn St to have a second chance. Sigh.
Hardly a DM apologist. First off, it wasn't even domestic violence. They were not in a relationship or roomies. That alone shows you don't know the story. Second, I never said I thought his acts were justified, you assumed ignorantly that I did. Of course you won't admit you're wrong or apologize, but that's to be expected from you. You claimed as much, then went on attempt to insult me.
I simply had issue with the announcer, who has sucked for years now, only telling one side of the story. Should Mixon have hit her? Hell no. Should Musburger have gave one side of the story? Again, hell no. The fact is she initiated the contact first, and called him racial slurs, at a bar. Very poor judgment on both sides. So we're in complete agreement on the entire issue, that he shouldn't have hit her, and that he's being unfairly slandered after serving his punishment. Yet you still go off the deep end with insults and try to start something. Makes no sense, but that's you in a nutshell.
About hypocrisy, is the feminist that was equal everything for women, until it doesn't go their way. They want women in every job in the military because they can do everything a man can do they claim. Women hits a man first, man hits back. Worse thing every. Not very equal there. That's hypocrisy.
"Beat" them. So did FSU, most likely, if not for a phantom penalty. Some believe it was the ACC protecting their chance to have a playoff team. I would not be surprised if this behavior becomes an unintended consequence of the playoff. Perhaps the refs shouldn't be affiliated with any conference, I believe that's how they do it in Basketball?
The problem with sanctions is that it usually punishes people who had nothing to do with it. The players that committed had no idea. I understand the need for punitive sanctions but in the end everybody ends up losing. Cleanse the coaching staff and anyone who had or may have known of it. I think McQueary is among the worst of all of them. And the bastard won a lawsuit against PSU.
That's exactly what I said earlier, the refs gave Clemson the game, and again in the Louisville game. There was no foul on that play with FSU, which certainly went a very long way in deciding the game. Pathetic job at officiating. It's like Clemson is the Seahacks of college football.