darkewaffle
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2005
- 8,152
- 1
- 81
poor stafford! ha.
Glad I didn't watch that game. Looked awful. Bears are going to get out to a 6-1 start then probably end up 8-8. The last half of their schedule is really tough and it won't take long for Cutler to self destruct. Bears shall be exposed as fakers (i don't know if many people out there think they are really good anyways)
poor stafford! ha.
Glad I didn't watch that game. Looked awful. Bears are going to get out to a 6-1 start then probably end up 8-8. The last half of their schedule is really tough and it won't take long for Cutler to self destruct. Bears shall be exposed as fakers (i don't know if many people out there think they are really good anyways)
How come no one's complaining about the Bears' defense giving up a TD at the end to screw up the spread for the gamblers?
This was a thing of beauty
poor stafford! ha.
Glad I didn't watch that game. Looked awful. Bears are going to get out to a 6-1 start then probably end up 8-8. The last half of their schedule is really tough and it won't take long for Cutler to self destruct. Bears shall be exposed as fakers (i don't know if many people out there think they are really good anyways)
fock I'm a little worried the Bears will steal the division like in 2010. And if the Packers finish 10-6*, that might miss the cut in the NFC. *Based on their schedule, this might be highly conservative.poor stafford! ha.
Glad I didn't watch that game. Looked awful. Bears are going to get out to a 6-1 start then probably end up 8-8. The last half of their schedule is really tough and it won't take long for Cutler to self destruct. Bears shall be exposed as fakers (i don't know if many people out there think they are really good anyways)
Why is the Saints bounty-gate thing trying to include Paul Tagliabue? I didn't catch all that story...or any of it really