They won only 2 games with almost the same roster (minus Manning) as the year before. I seriously thought they should've given Manning the MVP because he proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he was more important to his team than any other player was to his team.
They won only 2 games with almost the same roster (minus Manning) as the year before. I seriously thought they should've given Manning the MVP because he proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he was more important to his team than any other player was to his team.
They won only 2 games with almost the same roster (minus Manning) as the year before. I seriously thought they should've given Manning the MVP because he proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he was more important to his team than any other player was to his team.
Heh no doubt. But also think Irsay was making the coaches intentionally tank that year to be frontrunners in the Suck for Luck campaign.
Heh no doubt. But also think Irsay was making the coaches intentionally tank that year to be frontrunners in the Suck for Luck campaign.
Hey!
()
If clowney was there, likely a texans victory last night. Colts had incredible luck with several of their first drives and a total brain fart letting them get an easy onside recovery. I'd say foster went beast mode about mid second quarter and on, but it wasn't even that. He wasn't breaking through tackles cause the colts just seemed to not be able to touch him until he hd gone 6+ yards on so many runs.
Looking back on that game, the score off of the onside kick was critical.
They would have been only up 3 when Houston took over, and we would have had a different game.
Luck is just special. I wonder how much the Redtaints are regretting their choice right now ...
Guy is really special and on his way to top 5 of all time. Im amazed at the way pep hamilton puts him in a position to find open guys. Love the way Luck makes mistakes as well. Shrugs em off when they happen and take ownership of his mistakes in press conferences before hes asked usually. Really smart thoughtful guy.
Luck is just special. I wonder how much the Redtaints are regretting their choice right now ...
What choice? Indy had the #1 pick and took Luck, so he was never an option since the Colts would have never traded away the 1.01 draft slot. If you mean they should regret trading the farm to the Rams in order to draft RG3 at 1.02 then I'm right with you.
Luck is just special. I wonder how much the Redtaints are regretting their choice right now ...
What choice? Indy had the #1 pick and took Luck, so he was never an option since the Colts would have never traded away the 1.01 draft slot. If you mean they should regret trading the farm to the Rams in order to draft RG3 at 1.02 then I'm right with you.
I know, but they could have gone after Wilson.
In fairness to them, they never had a shot at Luck. If they had a chance at Luck but drafted RGIII instead, they would deserve even more derision than they have already suffered. Any Redskins fan who seriously thinks RGIII is better than Luck is a delusional moron at this stage. I won't call out the ATOT forum members who said RGIII was better; I'll let them bask in their own embarrassment.
Luck is just special. I wonder how much the Redtaints are regretting their choice right now ...
That onside kick was a great move, IMO. It was unprompted and exploited a stupid formation the Texans had. Plus, it kept the momentum for Luck and co. to really jump to an early lead. They eventually stopped playing (once it was 24-0), but for a time, Indy just dominated everything.
It was great, and the import of my mentioning that was that sort of play changes game plans. I don't know what their [Texans] game plan was, but I'm sure that being down 3 allows you to run the ball more than being down 10 verse Luck does.
If I recall, the started passing immediately when they got the ball back. That probably doesn't happen down 3 with Foster in the backfield.