This is what I don't understand. Why is the NHL allowing this stuff. Why would they intentionally allow big city teams to bully talent away from smaller cities?
They made NJ rewrite Kovy's deal, they shouldn't allow this one - imo , of course.
Also Weber, who is one of my favorite NHLers, on Philly, the team I hate the most in the NHL, would make me very very sad. So yeah theres bias.
Its not just the NHL, this can happen in any sport. Jeremy Lin just got snatched by the Rockets in the same sort of deal.
Restricted free agency is a tricky thing. The difference is that GM's in the NHL and NBA are more ruthless. Offering a player an offer-sheet to get them to sign with you is frowned upon in the industry. Any relationship between GM's when they do this sort of thing is tarnished, not just with the GM of the team he's doing it to but all the other GM's in the NHL.
But this is going to hurt Holmgrens reputation throughout the league, and some teams, not just Nashville, will simply refuse to do business with Holmgren now after he has done this. Which is pretty funny since Phili and Nashville have been trade partners in the past on numerous occasions, Forsberg, Hartnell, Timonon - and apparently they were in serious talks for trading Shea Weber before this. Most in the industry know that Holmgren and Poile probably both consider each other friends, so its even stranger. Time will tell how this affects relationships with other GM's, but I think it will halt others from doing business with Phili, or even cause Nashville to try and target one of their upcoming RFA's, if they can pull it off. It definitely hurts relationships and those damages last well after the franchise has moved on to another GM.
For instance, as long as there is any remaining management from the Joe Sakic era residing in the front office of the Avalanche, I'd be surprised if anything other than a minor AHL type transaction ever happens between the Rangers and the Avalanche, ever. Our front office is definitely the type to hold a grudge and I happen to know for a fact that any of our front office will never do business with the New York Rangers as long as they are there, for what they tried to do 15 years ago.
The other differences throughout the different sports are how the tenders work in other sports. For instance, Nashville placed the RFA qualifying tender of 4 - 1st round draft picks on Shea Weber. So if he was to sign an offer sheet and Nashville was to lose him, they receive the next 4 - 1st round draft picks from Phili. Which might happen. So they are getting "some" compensation.
In the NFL, you rarely ever see this sort of thing even though it is possible - first off because they now have the "franchise tag" so if they ever run into a situation with an RFA they want to make sure this doesn't happen to, they slap that tag on him and it basically forces the player to take a year salary at the appropriate market rate (and they are always well compensated) and they negotiate extensions after. GM's in the NFL are also much less ruthless and don't want to damage relationships. I'm not entirely sure why that is, other than maybe just a gentleman's agreement between them. Even before the CBA change that made for the franchise tag, you rarely ever saw such a scenario playout in the NFL although I'm sure there are cases of it happening.
I know of one reason, and thats because teams in the NFL aren't willing to give up the tender that is on a player in order to get them signed to an offer sheet. For instance, Mike Wallace is an RFA and you can sign him to an offer sheet (last I heard any way, Pitts may have franchised him since I heard this, but I think they franchised someone else on their roster). At the cost of a 1st round draft pick, any team that offers Mike Wallace a contract he is happy with and signs can get Wallace away from Pitts unless Pitts matches it, and lose their next 1st round pick as compensation. However, picks hold a lot more value in the NFL because you need to fill out a 53 man roster, not a much smaller roster like in the NHL or NBA. Phili can afford to give Nashville 4 1st round picks for a player of Shea Webers caliber because they will all be high picks in the first round which don't always amount to a starter, and the chances of them being as good as Weber are even slimmer.
The NFL also has compensatory picks each year in the draft for teams that lose RFA to offer sheets or off waivers. So it does happen in the NFL, its just very rare with high profile players, and usually its something like a player on a team that they don't need and another team does so they pick them up off waivers - it works out for both teams as one needed another body in camp to exercise competition and the other team gets a compensatory pick.