Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 31
- 91
I'm going to keep harping on this Tennessee thing because it's the most obvious fuck up of a selection committee I have ever seen. I thought a 4 would be awesome and would settle for a 5 but a 6? Good lord maybe they should just let computer programs do this for us.
I already gave my reasons as to why UT's first match up is lame if you go from an RPI basis. Now, look at this.
Final AP Rankings:
UT - 15
Georgetown - 14
Final Coaches Poll Rankings:
UT - 14
Georgetown - 15
Final RPI:
UT - 14
Georgetown - 7
Tourney Seeding (in the same f'n bracket):
UT - 6
Georgetown - 3
What the hell? Yeah I understand that Georgetown had the #1 SoS (TN was #17) and I'm not even arguing that Georgetown shouldn't have a better seed. But based on body of work why in the heck should these two teams be in a scenario where they could meet in the 2nd round? It sucks for both of them. The committee fucking sucked this year.
I already gave my reasons as to why UT's first match up is lame if you go from an RPI basis. Now, look at this.
Final AP Rankings:
UT - 15
Georgetown - 14
Final Coaches Poll Rankings:
UT - 14
Georgetown - 15
Final RPI:
UT - 14
Georgetown - 7
Tourney Seeding (in the same f'n bracket):
UT - 6
Georgetown - 3
What the hell? Yeah I understand that Georgetown had the #1 SoS (TN was #17) and I'm not even arguing that Georgetown shouldn't have a better seed. But based on body of work why in the heck should these two teams be in a scenario where they could meet in the 2nd round? It sucks for both of them. The committee fucking sucked this year.