It could very well have something to do with that. The power is lower, and the IPC is higher than Zen 2.I'm wondering why the base clock is 0.1GHz lower compared to 3000.
I would assume the cost for extra IPC?
Whether a data point is an outlier or not in the context of gaming has got nothing to do with a games popularity.Do NIST recommendations include telling young gamers to ignore their favorite titles because their use case is not statically sound? What happens if this type of performance boost in Zen 3 gaming performance correlates with even more competitive titles which are built for a wider audience?
Personally I'll wait for the 5800X reviews until I declare a winner in this match up.
i bought a 3600xNo one bought the 3600x since it was a stupid chip, the 3600 that launched at $200 was the 6c/12t champion that everyone bought.
Most likely to keep the power draw in check when all core Turbo is on (as the core is much beefier but still on the same process node). That is why the scaling in MT workloads versus 3950X is smaller, 5950X runs at lower all core boost clock. It's impressive how they managed to get that performance on the same node, Zen3 is a masterpiece of physical and logical design.I'm wondering why the base clock is 0.1GHz lower compared to 3000.
I would assume the cost for extra IPC?
Gotta be honest the prices don’t make me want to run out & buy one, I do like the idea that I could buy an assumably cheaper one in 2-3 years and gain a quick 35(ish)% performance boost.
Man I was looking forward to Ryzen 5 5600. But I'm not going to pay historical i7 prices for straight midrange performance. Probably just go Intel with an i5-10400f instead.
Interesting sidenote, Zen3 has 41% higher IPC than Zen1 . Initial target for Zen1 over Bulldozer was the same 40%. I'm now pretty sure Zen5 has a similar IPC goal versus Zen3.
Assuming you're not pairing with a high refresh display and near flagship GPU, that only makes it easier to recommend something with a 3600 or 3600x and an x570 for a build. Move onto Zen3 when it's less pricey, maybe with refresh SKUs.
1.15 * 1.19 == 1.3685, or a ~37% IPC improvement over Zen 1.
What do we base this on? That it gets the biggest gain using Vulkan versus without?
I wouldn't have used GTA:V as an example of a good multi-threaded implementation.
I would discount DOTA 2 simply because it's difficult to benchmark, plus we do not know if the frame rate cap has been removed.Dota 2 running at over 300 FPS on an overclocked 9900K plus RTX 2080 at 1440p. This is with the framerate unlocked. The standard game has a framerate cap of 240 FPS, so I wonder if AMD knew that it had to be unlocked?
1.035 for Zen+, math is in my sig .1.15 * 1.19 == 1.3685, or a ~37% IPC improvement over Zen 1.
Do you even know how outliers are decided? Here have a read:
"The games I play most are not outliers" attitude is completely wrong.
So? They didn't present the Ryzen 5 5600 today so you don't even know its MSRP yet.Ryzen 5 3600 MSRP has always been $200.
So? They didn't present the Ryzen 5 5600 today so you don't even know its MSRP yet.
Probably won't be one or they would have announced it.
Show me tuned RAM results which show massive gains for Zen 2 that are NOT 720p benchmarks. You have 200 MHz headroom left on Zen 2 if you're overclocking memory and want to keep the DRAM:FCLK ratio at 1:1. On Intel you have a 800MHz headroom.
Would be the first time AMD launches all Ryzen SKUs all at once then.Probably won't be one or they would have announced it.
upper quartile{1.21,1.05,1.06,1.06,0.97,1.01,1.19,1.06,1.02,1.05} = 1.06Fun fact CS:GO and League of Legends are not outliers at all according to the NIST definition.