yeshua
Member
- Aug 7, 2019
- 166
- 134
- 86
Isn't it exciting to what lengths some people go trying to vindicate AMD's new pricing:
Yeah, the Ryzen 7 3700X which was introduced at $330 and now costs on average around $310 (and occasionally is being sold for as low as $250), has suddenly become $90 more expensive according to Linus Tech Tips (with over 12 million subscribers) - the channel has openly become very pro-AMD recently to the point where they criticize or/and underplay anything released by NVIDIA/Intel: "I'm DONE covering for NVIDIA - RTX 3070 Review".
And Linus conveniently forgot about the existence of 3600 which was introduced at $200 (and now can be have for less that $160). Yeah, "just a measly $50 price increase" when reality it starts from 50%. Oh, and the Ryzen 5 3600X costs $250, not $300! AMD does love fat margins!
Yeah, the Ryzen 7 3700X which was introduced at $330 and now costs on average around $310 (and occasionally is being sold for as low as $250), has suddenly become $90 more expensive according to Linus Tech Tips (with over 12 million subscribers) - the channel has openly become very pro-AMD recently to the point where they criticize or/and underplay anything released by NVIDIA/Intel: "I'm DONE covering for NVIDIA - RTX 3070 Review".
And Linus conveniently forgot about the existence of 3600 which was introduced at $200 (and now can be have for less that $160). Yeah, "just a measly $50 price increase" when reality it starts from 50%. Oh, and the Ryzen 5 3600X costs $250, not $300! AMD does love fat margins!
Last edited: