**OFFICIAL WAR THREAD** 7th Calvary fights off Iraqi attack; Bush seeks 75 billion for war

Page 91 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NorthenLove

Banned
Oct 2, 2001
525
0
0
This says alot without saying to much ! Read between the lines here.

Penhaul said the helicopters encountered a "heavy, heavy barrage" of anti-aircraft fire in the battle, about 60 miles south of Baghdad. He could not immediately say whether all of the U.S. helicopters returned safely.

More then likely means they took some losses.
 

NorthenLove

Banned
Oct 2, 2001
525
0
0
Originally posted by: MoobyTheGoldenCalf
Originally posted by: Bluga
Rumors have it that 103 US soldiers just got killed?

Where? Link?

This happened when they ambused the convoy and took those prisoneers you saw in the other links. Of course I have heard that it was 100-206 killed.
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Just on MSNBC: Recon photos of Baghdad show the words "human shields" on the rooftops of some buildings.

Wha?

unfortunately for them cruise missiles don't read rooftops
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Just on MSNBC: Recon photos of Baghdad show the words "human shields" on the rooftops of some buildings.

Wha?

unfortunately for them cruise missiles don't read rooftops

just have them hold up targets...works the same way
 

Pastfinder

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2000
2,352
0
0
Why not use napalm on some of these Iraqi units. I'd think that would get their attention to maybe surrender or be burned alive...
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
We do not use Napalm since it is more or less "illegal" at this point, but we do have the MOAB......
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Iraq tries to rally Arab world

But, from the article:

Although most Arab people are angry about the American-led attack, some Arab governments are opposed, openly or in private, to Saddam Hussein.

They are unlikely to support a common statement from the Arab League that condemns the Americans
 

LH

Golden Member
Feb 16, 2002
1,604
0
0
This happened when they ambused the convoy and took those prisoneers you saw in the other links. Of course I have heard that it was 100-206 killed.

Uh no. If you are talking about the 4-5 POWs that were seen on TV. That wasnt a ambush on the whole convoy. That particular vehicle made a wrong turn, and then was ambushed by Iraqis wearing civilian clothing and were in pick up trucks.

There was not 100-206 killed in that ambush. Not unless there was just now another ambush on another convoy and more POWs taking.

There were 4 dead, 5 POWs and 7 dead POWs taken from that ambush.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
we could use a new "official war thread"...this one is getting way too long...anyone agree?
 

DanJ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
3,509
0
0
Originally posted by: rudeguy5757
we could use a new "official war thread"...this one is getting way too long...anyone agree?
I agree; no one is going to reply to a post on pages 2-50.
 

LH

Golden Member
Feb 16, 2002
1,604
0
0
We do not use Napalm since it is more or less "illegal" at this point, but we do have the MOAB

The US never signed the treaty that banned napalm. Nor did we sign the treaty that banned land mines.
 

ChrisIsBored

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
3,400
1
71
Originally posted by: DanJ
Originally posted by: rudeguy5757
we could use a new "official war thread"...this one is getting way too long...anyone agree?
I agree; no one is going to reply to a post on pages 2-50.

We're only up to page 23.... Change your forum view settings.
 

DanJ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
3,509
0
0
Originally posted by: ChrisIsBored
Originally posted by: DanJ
Originally posted by: rudeguy5757
we could use a new "official war thread"...this one is getting way too long...anyone agree?
I agree; no one is going to reply to a post on pages 2-50.
We're only up to page 23.... Change your forum view settings.
Hah, well then it takes forever for pages to load sometimes; I'm on page 76
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |