Sorry, I was at work and they were actually making me do stuff. It was awful.That's your cue, Ruptga.
Come on, Jack, look at his posts and tell me he's not devout.
Probably, no matter how low you set your expectations there's always someone that doesn't meet them.Are there people that still actually read sportage posts?
Those assholes. I hope you're going to file a grievance.Sorry, I was at work and they were actually making me do stuff. It was awful.
Are there people that still actually read sportage posts?
Other than the bits about Trump having an awful temperament and Clinton being a conniving bitch, which are both obvious, that was all crap. He's a manchild, she's more interested in power than in doing right by anyone, these are not good things. Neither one of them should be in charge of a softball league, let alone a nation of 320 million. Yes, I'm an asshole. I really wanted to support Johnson but that guy just isn't ready, so I'm an asshole.Louis C. K.
If you vote for Hillary, you're a grownup, if you vote for Trump, you're a sucker, if you don't vote for anyone, you're an asshole.
pretty much how I feel, but he makes much more of an argument beyond that. Mothers vs Fathers (not men vs women), the ability to take endless amounts of shit and still keep working, vs. shutting down everything for weeks because someone called you a poopy face on the internet. etc...
Other than the bits about Trump having an awful temperament and Clinton being a conniving bitch, which are both obvious, that was all crap. He's a manchild, she's more interested in power than in doing right by anyone, these are not good things. Neither one of them should be in charge of a softball league, let alone a nation of 320 million. Yes, I'm an asshole. I really wanted to support Johnson but that guy just isn't ready, so I'm an asshole.
Hillary's track record involves her doing a lot of public service as a public defendant, making a foundation that genuinely helps people (her foundation has a higher pay-out than the Red Cross), and she spend a lot of time in congress trying to get health care accessible to everyone.
You could do a write-in candidate.Other than the bits about Trump having an awful temperament and Clinton being a conniving bitch, which are both obvious, that was all crap. He's a manchild, she's more interested in power than in doing right by anyone, these are not good things. Neither one of them should be in charge of a softball league, let alone a nation of 320 million. Yes, I'm an asshole. I really wanted to support Johnson but that guy just isn't ready, so I'm an asshole.
I'm generally non-partisan, but I do like truth in reporting. Hillary's track record involves her doing a lot of public service as a public defendant, making a foundation that genuinely helps people (her foundation has a higher pay-out than the Red Cross), and she spend a lot of time in congress trying to get health care accessible to everyone. This, to me, shows a person that is interested in making things better.
Yeah, who? I was going to do that for Sanders until he started shilling for the power players that guaranteed his campaign never had a chance. I'm not aware of a single political figure that I respect enough to support.You could do a write-in candidate.
Fox news told me that the Clinton foundation is a political fundraising slush fund.
You could vote for me, or Bullwinkle & Rocky, or write in "None of the above"...You're not wrong. She has also supported less endearing things like the Patriot Act and its renewal, she didn't have the sense (or principles, take your pick) to keep a clear division between her personal and public work in regards to the Clinton Foundation, she didn't have the sense (or principles, again take your pick) to keep her campaign from actively undermining the integrity of its own party's primary, and she routinely "pivots" her positions when they fall out of public favor. She's a smooth politician, no less but no more. Once she wins we'll have 8 more years of the same old - lip service to progress and freedom with maybe one big policy change but that's about it.
Yeah, who? I was going to do that for Sanders until he started shilling for the power players that guaranteed his campaign never had a chance. I'm not aware of a single political figure that I respect enough to support.
You're not wrong. She has also supported less endearing things like the Patriot Act and its renewal, she didn't have the sense (or principles, take your pick) to keep a clear division between her personal and public work in regards to the Clinton Foundation, she didn't have the sense (or principles, again take your pick) to keep her campaign from actively undermining the integrity of its own party's primary, and she routinely "pivots" her positions when they fall out of public favor. She's a smooth politician, no less but no more. Once she wins we'll have 8 more years of the same old - lip service to progress and freedom with maybe one big policy change but that's about it.
Yeah, who? I was going to do that for Sanders until he started shilling for the power players that guaranteed his campaign never had a chance. I'm not aware of a single political figure that I respect enough to support.
Other than the bits about Trump having an awful temperament and Clinton being a conniving bitch, which are both obvious, that was all crap. He's a manchild, she's more interested in power than in doing right by anyone, these are not good things. Neither one of them should be in charge of a softball league, let alone a nation of 320 million. Yes, I'm an asshole. I really wanted to support Johnson but that guy just isn't ready, so I'm an asshole.
Yeah, the worst thing about her is that she's what we've all come to expect from our politicians. If you're cool with the way things have always been you should be completely fine with her, I know we can do better though.I guess that's it. Hillary's main crime is she's a politician, and they're all like that. I really liked Sanders, but the DNC didn't, so that was a done deal. Trump, on the other hand, is not a politician, but is an all-around terrible human being. The only reason he was nominated is because too many candidates watered down the playing field and it skewed the votes in the primaries. The GOP essentially created Trump, and now they have to live with him.
Sure off the top of my head:I guess you might think this, if you ignore her actual 30+ years of actual public service. This "she's a selfish power-hungry monster" is that zombie myth that simply refuses to die. I get that you will never believe otherwise, but I wonder if you can point to some tangible examples of this power-hungry monsterism from Hillary that exist outside of the right-wing disinformation bubble?
Yeah, the worst thing about her is that she's what we've all come to expect from our politicians. If you're cool with the way things have always been you should be completely fine with her, I know we can do better though.
Sure off the top of my head:
1. She flip-flopped on the invasion of Iraq, being in favor of it when even the patriotism of the Dixie Chicks was being questioned and then reversing when the bodies started coming home. She'd already gotten the intervention she wanted, so reversing position didn't really matter and it kept her on the correct side of public opinion.
2. She continues to support our surveillance state via the Patriot Act though, backing down from that would actually make a difference.
3. These are about the first President Clinton, but they apply because she has supported the kind of foreign policy that's being talked about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd8jPKwArsM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZtPzOukjZA
Also, go fuck yourself zin. You assume that I'll never believe otherwise, probably because you've spent too much time dealing with P&Ners that constantly stim themselves with cries of "Benghazi" and "death panels", but that's hardly my fault. She's not an OMGmonster any more than Bush is, but that's hardly a compliment.
yeah yeah. A person don't need to be an extremist to be a wise and beautiful woman, it just helps their odds.The Clintons are centrists; take some time to reflect on what that implies and you'll be well ahead of the dumbshits here.
yeah yeah. A person don't need to be an extremist to be a wise and beautiful woman, it just helps their odds.
I do not give a single fuck about what I'm told to think, least of all by you. Clinton sucks objectively, deal with it. She is centrist within US politics, whoop de fookin doo. Joseph P. Overton would like to have a word with you on the subject, though you may need a medium.No, really think about how centrism works, eg with respect to changing policy for prevailing opinion. Just because you're told to blindly hate on the clintons doesn't mean you have to stupid.
I do not give a single fuck about what I'm told to think. Clinton sucks objectively, deal with it. She is centrist within US politics, whoop de fookin doo. Joseph P. Overton would like to have a word with you on the subject, though you may need a medium.
Yeah, who? I was going to do that for Sanders until he started shilling for the power players that guaranteed his campaign never had a chance. I'm not aware of a single political figure that I respect enough to support.
Yeah ok. Parroting their talking points would have involved using the words socialist and Benghazi by now, and Republicans don't give a shit about her opinions on Iraq or the Patriot Act since they line up so well with their own. They're also very unlikely to link to comments condemning pointless bombing campaigns, especially when it's also at the expense of a good pointless sex scandal. You're a moron.You don't do yourself any favors by parroting gop talking points on clinton instead of discussing what problems you have with centrist policy.