Ha, we'll see. I read there were a ton of .mil and .gov addresses. That should provide at least a little entertainment.
Most of the male userbase were probably single losers looking for hookups with any breathing female that would write them back.
Yet another reason this "outing" doesn't mean much.
Can someone just post the full text of the list here
Wat? 40 million members?
What is Snowden treated like a hero in some circles?
He certainly illegally accessed a system and released its information playing the moral authority card and didn't go through proper channels.
Many people compare Edward Snowden to me unfavorably for leaving the country and seeking asylum, rather than facing trial as I did. I dont agree. The country I stayed in was a different America, a long time ago.
After the New York Times had been enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers on June 15, 1971, the first prior restraint on a newspaper in U.S. history and I had given another copy to The Post (which would also be enjoined), I went underground with my wife, Patricia, for 13 days. My purpose (quite like Snowdens in flying to Hong Kong) was to elude surveillance while I was arranging with the crucial help of a number of others, still unknown to the FBI to distribute the Pentagon Papers sequentially to 17 other newspapers, in the face of two more injunctions. The last three days of that period was in defiance of an arrest order: I was, like Snowden now, a fugitive from justice.
~snip~
But for the whole two years I was under indictment, I was free to speak to the media and at rallies and public lectures. I was, after all, part of a movement against an ongoing war. Helping to end that war was my preeminent concern. I couldnt have done that abroad, and leaving the country never entered my mind.
There is no chance that experience could be reproduced today, let alone that a trial could be terminated by the revelation of White House actions against a defendant that were clearly criminal in Richard Nixons era and figured in his resignation in the face of impeachment but are today all regarded as legal.
The National Security Agency may present a united front when it defends against criticism of its bulk phone data collection, but it's now clear that there has been at least some doubt within the ranks. Associated Press sources have revealed that there was an internal proposal to kill the phone surveillance program in early 2013, not long before Edward Snowden's leaks made it public. Reportedly, some NSA officials were concerned that the initiative was not only expensive to run, but ineffective. It wasn't "central" to catching terrorist plots, and it wasn't capturing most cellphone calls. Not surprisingly, the critics were also worried about outrage if the truth came out -- which, of course, is exactly what happened.
Another 20GB of data dumped? Awesome.
That being said, how has nobody set up a searchable website yet? I want to search for some names and addresses I know!
Another 20GB of data dumped? Awesome.
That being said, how has nobody set up a searchable website yet? I want to search for some names and addresses I know!
I sill think legalized prostitution in the USA would do wonders for the, er, economy.
When the Rhode Island legislature inadvertently decriminalized indoor prostitution in the state from 2003 to 2009, it proved beneficial to UCLA public policy professor Manisha Shah.
Shah and her co-author Scott Cunningham of Baylor University examined data from that period, becoming the first social scientists to evaluate the decriminalization of prostitution using a natural experiment.
They're pretty useless; you can put in one email address only, and who knows who you just gave that email address to, right?CNN said there were searchable sites already up.
What network domain name does Clinton use. We know she never used .gov.
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34032760?ocid=socialflow_twitterAshley Madison is facing a C$760m ($576m; £367m) class-action lawsuit after customer data from the infidelity dating website was leaked onto the so-called dark web last week.
Two Canadian firms - Charney Lawyers and Sutts, Strosberg LLP - are bringing the action against Avid Dating Life and Avid Media, which run the site.
They said they were acting on behalf on "all Canadians" affected by the breach.
Hackers, known as the Impact Team, stole the data last month.
It included users' names, email and home addresses, and message history. The hackers threatened at the time to reveal the information unless the site was taken down.
"Numerous former users of AshleyMadison.com have approached the law firms to inquire about their privacy rights under Canadian law," the two firms said in a statement.
I'm not sure if you're being serious or sarcastic.Another Canadian success story... just like Nortel, Research in Motion / Blackberry, Bombardier.
Ha, we'll see. I read there were a ton of .mil and .gov addresses. That should provide at least a little entertainment.
Ashley Madison is facing huge class action lawsuit
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34032760?ocid=socialflow_twitter
Has there been anything like that after any other recent significant data leaks that exposed financially-damaging information about millions of people?Ashley Madison is facing huge class action lawsuit
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34032760?ocid=socialflow_twitter
Has to be a joke, anyone silly enough to do that get's fired on the spot simply because they have the IQ of a 6 year old
Wouldn't most guys/girls that want to cheat use an alternative email address when they sign up? I mean it's common sense.