OK, that's fair. To tell it right it's going to be long, though.
They hired a woman right out of school. She wore fashion model clothes (don't know how else to describe it), and people were buzzing about the clothes since she had just graduated and they seemed pretty costly. A couple months later she starts dating a guy (Andy) from another department. A few months later, they are engaged. A month or so after the engagement, the clothes started to drift towards jeans and run-of-the-mill shirts and sometimes the hair was pulled back instead of carefully styled. Some guys start teasing Andy about it, as up until then she turned heads anywhere she went. Andy is a pretty narcissistic guy and the teasing is infuriating him, as his perfect fashion doll with the perfect hair/makeup and expensive clothes was now seen as merely mortal. Andy is easy to get wound up anyway, so it's not unusual for people to tease him just to see him go ballistic.
Apparently, Andy's ego gets the best of him, and after three months of being engaged, he breaks up with her. Don't know what reason was given, only that she no longer wore the ring, they no longer ate lunch together every day, and the word was going around about the breakup.
Three weeks or so after the breakup, Andy is summoned to HR to meet with the head of HR, the company lawyer, and the outside hired gun lawyer. The girl went to HR and claimed Andy had hounded her from her first week of work and then after he got "what he wanted" he dumped her. She said she felt helpless to say no since she was a new employee and feared for her job if she had turned him down since he was a supervisor and she was a lowly file clerk. Her explanation for coming forward now was this: when crying to one of her girlfriends about how Andy used her, the girlfriend told her that what Andy did was illegal and she had a duty to protect other women by blowing the whistle even though she might suffer consequences for standing up for herself.
It seems that the girl will be satisfied if Andy leaves the company. The lawyers don't believe there's any evidence that Andy harrassed her legally, so they aren't too worried about her doing anything in that sense. But this has become an ongoing distraction that is impacting people getting the work done. No one wants to talk to either one of them, even on work-related issues.
They might offer her some money to leave, or they might encourage Andy to leave (with a good recommendation and severance pay). No one broke any laws, and I'm sure they are both spinning the story for their own purposes to some degree. But it seems clear one of them is going to have to go.