Guys seriously, this is never going to get to discovery.
Guys seriously, this is never going to get to discovery.Oh yes, by all means. Discovery will be a treat.
You think it's just a stunt?Guys seriously, this is never going to get to discovery.
The essential claim here is that Clinton and others are lying about Trump’s connections to Russia, which would mean that I’m discovery Trump would have to testify under oath about these connections and also turn over all personal and business records related to Russia.You think it's just a stunt?
Personally, I'd really like to see this go through discovery and trial. It would be at the very least amusing, and at best a clusterfuck of biblical proportions.
If he's that dumb let him do it.The essential claim here is that Clinton and others are lying about Trump’s connections to Russia, which would mean that I’m discovery Trump would have to testify under oath about these connections and also turn over all personal and business records related to Russia.
I think the odds of him doing that are basically zero.
What Trump is probably doing here is giving a nice donation to Clinton’s attorneys when he has to pay their fees.
Nah, if it’s not thrown out right away (likely) he will drop it before discovery.If he's that dumb let him do it.
Oh please, don't show me a bunch of odd looking carrots.Flordia is America's crooked wang.
If it does get to discovery (It will not for many reasons) when the defendants get to start requesting documents from Trump and the Trump campaign this lawsuit will either be dropped or cause serious problems for Trump.
I can hear Trump and his lawyers now when asked for documents:
“Your honor, this entire lawsuit is nothing but a Democrat Party ploy to gain illegal access to Mr. Trump’s personal information!”
“But you filed the lawsuit.”
“See! .... That just proves how sneaky, corrupt and duplicitous the Democrat Party is!”
lol
You’d think by now Trump would be running out of lawyers willing to file frivolous lawsuits. Goes to show that there's a bottomless pit of shit lawyers.
Not even one step . If anything a step down as Saul had much better commercials. They have to be a step up from Rudy though.He hired a slimy ambulance chasing personal injury firm.
That's all he could get.
Seriously.
One step up from Saul Goodman.
Not even one step . If anything a step down as Saul had much better commercials. They have to be a step up from Rudy though.
Hey, they have 3.9/5.0 stars on Facebook.Lawsuit brought to you by...legalbrains.com??? Is he finally done with Rudy??? Who the fuck are these guys?
Hypocrisy is dripping off your post.Hildebeast broke the 8th commandment, via her proxy goons. lol
It's between her and her maker.
So your accusation as usual is a confession. I hope you learn to stop lying.Hildebeast broke the 8th commandment, via her proxy goons. lol
It's between her and her maker.
Are you sure it is legalbrains.com? Or is it smoothbrains.com?Lawsuit brought to you by...legalbrains.com??? Is he finally done with Rudy??? Who the fuck are these guys?
I'm not that well versed with RICO, but this lawsuit will probably fail.
Trump did too many things which caused the financial problems that he's claiming as damages. Trump didn't have to praise Putin 20 times in public during that campaign. He didn't have to say he had no business in Russia, while it was later discovered that he had a signed deal to build a Trump tower in Moscow. His staff didn't have to have 150 contacts with Russian officials, and lie about them. His son and campaign manager didn't have to have a meeting with a Russian lawyer where they expressed happiness over the Russians having stolen emails.
And on and on.
In the law, a plaintiff generally gets little or nothing after it is proven that they caused most of their own harm.
How about both?Are you sure it is legalbrains.com? Or is it smoothbrains.com?
You think it's just a stunt?
Personally, I'd really like to see this go through discovery and trial. It would be at the very least amusing, and at best a clusterfuck of biblical proportions.
Isn't RICO a criminal charge? I hear it being used with arresting mobsters. Not sure why it would be in a civil suit. This should just be libel or slander.I'm not that well versed with RICO, but this lawsuit will probably fail.
Trump did too many things which caused the financial problems that he's claiming as damages. Trump didn't have to praise Putin 20 times in public during that campaign. He didn't have to say he had no business in Russia, while it was later discovered that he had a signed deal to build a Trump tower in Moscow. His staff didn't have to have 150 contacts with Russian officials, and lie about them. His son and campaign manager didn't have to have a meeting with a Russian lawyer where they expressed happiness over the Russians having stolen emails.
And on and on.
In the law, a plaintiff generally gets little or nothing after it is proven that they caused most of their own harm.