Crazy Pub legislatures. Nuf said.I understand that, and from the article it looks like both parties screw this up regularly. I just dont understand how it happens in the first place, your elections dates and all these deadlines are all known years or decades ahead of time (I assume these deadlines stay fairly static) you have huge parties with campaigns that spend enormous amounts of money and have large amounts of expert staff, how does this kind of stuff get overlooked in the first place?
Are you really that mad that there's a native born American more successful than you that you have to convince yourself he's actually an immigrant?O’Bummer is/was proof we can’t trust birth certificates.
I guess it depends on if you think enforcing the law is 'taking the first shot'.He’s right…the Dems started it. (they may have had legal reasoning behind their attempts…unlike the Repubs) but they DID take the first shot.
Enforcing the law isn't imposing will, I'll never understand how some people don't get that.I guess it depends on if you think enforcing the law is 'taking the first shot'.
No he's wrong - one has actual sound legal reasoning behind it about a very fucking serious issue, the other is something happening purely out of spite and a lack of ethics.He’s right…the Dems started it. (they may have had legal reasoning behind their attempts…unlike the Repubs) but they DID take the first shot.
The Republicans have nothing to do with this.I think the Democrats have shown once again they've underestimated what the evil Republican party is about.
Sometimes you got to bring a knife to a knife fight, not think these evil fuckers will do the decent thing.
The Republicans have nothing to do with this.
The filing deadline is the same as it ever was. The DNC decided to hold their convention late and never noticed that if they nominated Joe late they would miss the filing deadline.
This demonstrates how the Democrats just cant do anything correctly, weather it involves entering an election or running a country.
These are not competent people. These are the people who screw up your drive through order.
The half-dozen plaintiffs in the Colorado case are all Republican or unaffiliated voters.
Are you really that mad that there's a native born American more successful than you that you have to convince yourself he's actually an immigrant?
So to be clear when Trump decided to hold his convention late in 2020 and missed the deadline you think that was evidence of his incompetence and that he would screw up a drive through order?The Republicans have nothing to do with this.
The filing deadline is the same as it ever was. The DNC decided to hold their convention late and never noticed that if they nominated Joe late they would miss the filing deadline.
This demonstrates how the Democrats just cant do anything correctly, weather it involves entering an election or running a country.
These are not competent people. These are the people who screw up your drive through order.
I guess it depends on if you think enforcing the law is 'taking the first shot'.
No he's wrong - one has actual sound legal reasoning behind it about a very fucking serious issue, the other is something happening purely out of spite and a lack of ethics.
Those are two different types of shots, so no, they are not comparable.
The fact people both sides this shit is fucking insanely wrong
Just to show how the Republicans value a fair election
The same problem existed in Alabama. The DNC could not file their paperwork on time.
Alabama lawmakers approve legislation to ensure President Biden is on the November ballot
Alabama lawmakers gave final approval to legislation to ensure President Joe Biden will appear on the state’s November ballot.apnews.com
The Republican led House, Senate and Governor passed a bill changing the rules to put Biden on the ballot despite the DNC mistake.
What was that again?The Republicans have nothing to do with this.
The filing deadline is the same as it ever was. The DNC decided to hold their convention late and never noticed that if they nominated Joe late they would miss the filing deadline.
This demonstrates how the Democrats just cant do anything correctly, weather it involves entering an election or running a country.
These are not competent people. These are the people who screw up your drive through order.
The issue is they didn't have legal reasoning. "Everyone knows" isn't an indictment, it isn't a conviction, it's hearsay.He’s right…the Dems started it. (they may have had legal reasoning behind their attempts…unlike the Repubs) but they DID take the first shot.
If Republicans value fair elections why did they attempt a coup when they lost the 2020 one?Just to show how the Republicans value a fair election
The same problem existed in Alabama. The DNC could not file their paperwork on time.
Alabama lawmakers approve legislation to ensure President Biden is on the November ballot
Alabama lawmakers gave final approval to legislation to ensure President Joe Biden will appear on the state’s November ballot.apnews.com
The Republican led House, Senate and Governor passed a bill changing the rules to put Biden on the ballot despite the DNC mistake.
This has been asked in this thread and in others and I don’t think I’ve ever seen it answered.
This logic means the people who wrote the 14th amendment thought it should be legal Robert E. Lee and/or Jefferson Davis to become president of the United States in 1868.
Do you think that’s the case? If so, why. If not, then clearly they did not consider being tried and convicted of a crime to be necessary. Which side do you land on?
There you go again, gettin' all facts and stuffOnce more, with enthusiasm: Republicans, not Democrats, tried to have Trump removed from the ballot in Colorado.
Trump back on ballot in Colorado while state Republicans appeal ban to Supreme Court
The Colorado Republican Party has appealed that state's Supreme Court decision that found former President Donald Trump is ineligible for the presidency.www.cbsnews.com
The issue is they didn't have legal reasoning. "Everyone knows" isn't an indictment, it isn't a conviction, it's hearsay.
If Taylor Swift tries to get on a ballot, do we have to have a trial and conviction to conclude she is 34?
The issue is they didn't have legal reasoning. "Everyone knows" isn't an indictment, it isn't a conviction, it's hearsay.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
This is 100% false.The issue is they didn't have legal reasoning. "Everyone knows" isn't an indictment, it isn't a conviction, it's hearsay.
After permitting President Trump and the Colorado Republican State Central Committee (“CRSCC”; collectively, “Intervenors”) to intervene in the action below, the district court conducted a five-day trial. The court found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection as those terms are used in Section Three.
Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
In her decision, Wallace said she found that Trump did in fact "engage in insurrection" on Jan. 6 and rejected his attorneys' arguments that he was simply engaging in free speech.