Olbermann in trouble w/ NBC?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
I don't think he should be fired.

I can't think of any straight journalistic show on MSNBC. The other cable news channels have them, but I don't think MSNBC does, they need to change their rule.

I also agree with Spidey07, it's their money so they should be able to contribute if they wish. It's also their 1st amendment right to do.

I guess the real problem is he didn't follow the rules; he should have informed MSNBC of his intention to donate.

But to pretend that this somehow jeopardizes his, or MSNBC's, 'impartiality' is laughable.

Fern

That's not entirely true - they have chosen to be employees of the organization, and that adds some restrictions on their activities.

If Olbermann was they keynote speaker at a KKK rally and donated to them, it's easy to see how MSNBC would find that damaging to their business/image.

And if you start staying 'Democrat or Republican OK, KKK bad', then what about the tea party, or code pink, or the Green Party? How do you draw the lines?

As I said, I don't agree with prohibiting him from modest (his $2,400 donations) contributions, but it's within their rights, it seems, to have that rule.
 

bl4ckfl4g

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2007
3,669
0
0
I think it is funny that they are pretending that without his donations, we think he is partial. I also find it weird and wrong that an employer can bar you from donating to a political party.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
But to pretend that this somehow jeopardizes his, or MSNBC's, 'impartiality' is laughable.

Fern

Like you would know fairness if it bit your nose off. Olbermann isn't 'impartial', but he has an honest show, something that's a far higher standard than Fox has.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Like you would know fairness if it bit your nose off. Olbermann isn't 'impartial', but he has an honest show, something that's a far higher standard than Fox has.

Thanks for the laugh. I nearly thouht you were serious!
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Like you would know fairness if it bit your nose off. Olbermann isn't 'impartial', but he has an honest show, something that's a far higher standard than Fox has.

<scream laugh> <breath breath breath> <scream laugh>

Oh man...that is like the funniest thing I've heard in a while... :thumbsup:

Chuck
 

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
I also agree with Spidey07, it's their money so they should be able to contribute if they wish. It's also their 1st amendment right to do.

I hate when people keep saying it&#8217;s their 1st amendment right to do so. Hey guess what, it&#8217;s only a 1st amendment right to do so without repercussions from the government. This doesn&#8217;t preclude consequences from other arenas, much like in the case of Juan Williams. NEITHER people are being arrested and incarcerated for what they said. There is no government action on what they said. Their 1st amendment right was never harmed in anyway.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
Like you would know fairness if it bit your nose off. Olbermann isn't 'impartial', but he has an honest show, something that's a far higher standard than Fox has.

LOL at Craig's definition of a political hack like Olbermann somehow being honest! Olbermann is an out and out partisan that inevitably spins a destructive narrative without any attempt at balance. That you agree with his spin does not make him honest or trustworthy or balanced.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Craig is about to blow a gasket.

First his beloved Democrats got pummeled in the election, and then to rub salt in his wounds his hero Keith Olbermann gets sacked.


Tough week for ya Craig, you have my condolences.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
Does this mean I won't have to listen to Olbermann on Sunday Night Football? Not that I do anyway, but I'd like to be able to save wear and tear on my remote's MUTE button.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Does this mean I won't have to listen to Olbermann on Sunday Night Football? Not that I do anyway, but I'd like to be able to save wear and tear on my remote's MUTE button.

Mine has been worn down to a nub just from that alone.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
Craig is about to blow a gasket.

First his beloved Democrats got pummeled in the election, and then to rub salt in his wounds his hero Keith Olbermann gets sacked.


Tough week for ya Craig, you have my condolences.

I remember when Olbermann was supposed to act as an impartial anchor during the 2008 election and then went on a lefty rant and got a show out of it. For the past two years he has been openly rabid.

I think all of these partisan hacks walk a very thin line even as they are encouraged to play out their emo qualities for ratings. When they inevitably blow themselves up their sponsors replace them with someone else just like them.

Lawrence O'Donnell is another one that blew himself up and got a late night show out of it on MSLSD. Look for him now to take over Olbermann's time slot and in a short while blow himself up and out of it.
 

Medellon

Senior member
Feb 13, 2000
812
2
81
They need to allow him one more show so he can showcase himself as "Worst person in the world."

So glad to see all these social progressive dumbasses losing their jobs.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
I guess no more "honest" commentary from him on football either. LOL @ Craig.

More people probably watched him during his 30 seconds of Sunday Night Football commentary than in an entire week of his show. He gets blown away by Oreilly during that time slot.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
I wonder if his boss is going to take his termination letter, crumble it up into a ball and fling it at him?
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,585
126
Well, if nothing else this shows that NBC has more journalistic integrity than Fox. If this was against the rules of NBC, then he has to accept the consequences of his choice. Goodness, imagine if Fox had this policy, they'd have to fire the entire network. Kinda sad though, he may have been partisan but at least he wasn't a constant source of falsehoods like .... well the entirety of Fox News.
 
Last edited:

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
He didn't work for CNN. And he is a source of falsehoods as much as anyone else, if not more.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |