Where are you pulling you BS stats out I'd like to know. Mine first link clearly says the methodoly they used for temperment testing.
Link.
those tests were conducted on 2003/2004
Your other link about bite stats data did not go past 1993.
over 20000 dogs were tested
Yes, but only 446 pit bulls were tested.
temperment test as discribed. You'd do a lot better reading than talking
I understand that. Though there is little supporting data on that page besides the fact that these dogs "pass". That coupled with the incredibly small data pool, doesn't say a lot.
anecdotal and personal bias. I worked at a pound and overwhemlingly was attacked by shepard breeds, also was attacked around same age as you were by a shepard, but you don't hear me using it as evidence, the facts speek for them selves, dipite being hugely popular animals, pitbulls bite far less than other dogs.
If the facts speak for themselves then the pitbull is still the #1 killer by far out of any dog. By at least twice as much. I believe lawmakers are looking more at fatalities than bites. Your personal experiences as a anectoal as mine, ad hominem.
That's good. You should'nt since even out of all the dogs in the united states 20 deaths per year in a dog population of 53 million yields an infinitesimal percent of the dog population (.0000004%) which kill out of all the breeds
The fact that it's such a small percentage of the overall population says nothing. Serial killers are an infinitesimal percent of the human population, that doesn't make them any less deadly. This can be applied to almost any dataset in the world.
Read the pitbull Faq I linked above. There are lots of unique traits people love about pitbulls. Plus what busines is it of yours?
I havn't read the whole thing, and I take it you havn't either. Though from what I've read the pit seems to be a very well rounded dog. It's my business when I get attacked, my family gets attacked and I can't feel safe in my neighborhood because someone owns a potentially deadly dog.
Sounds like a personal problem. You sleep with the lights on too? Again the "look" is what people ultimatly are offended by and even admit it, like you just did, if you talk to them long enough. I've never understood psychology though.
Again, being the #1 killer by a longshot will put a stigma around it, and rightfully so. The same would go for ANY breed. If chihuahua's started putting up numbers like pitbulls, the response would be the same.
When I was a kid we used to hunt with them. It's a sight to see a wild boar taken down by 4-6 pitbulls.
ADBA and AKC has dog shows all the time featuring pitbulls and they even win somtimes. They also compete agressivly in obdiance, flyball, agility, human assistance and protection shows from various sactioning bodies. AGAIN READ THE FAQ
Yea, I read the hunting part. Personally from all the hunters I know, I've never heard of anyone ever using a pitbull. I recognize the breeds wide spectrum of abilities.
Many people crush gardner snakes with thier hoes too, psychosis
Gardner snakes don't kill. Nor are gardner snakes the #1 killer in the snake species.
It boils down to the simple fact that pitbulls kill 3 times as much as any other breed of dog. I'm not saying that I support their stance in the banning of this breed, I can just understand how they are coming to that decision. This idea has the support of much of the population, including dog owners. Seems the only people not for it are pitbull owners.
It's not some magical coincidence that pitbulls are the #1 breed involved in fatal dog attacks. There will always be irresponsible dog owners, and they can own any breed they want, but when it comes down to it of all these dogs that are neglected, treated poorly etc, the pitbull is the one killing the most. If you wiped out every pitbull on the face of the planet, these people would take another kind of dog and do the same thing to it. You can't really ban the people(well you can), so you ban the dog.
So mabey the first step to truly regulating this breed is to ban it, and then set up a system in which to handle it. Ideally what you said about making people register and train their dogs and go through testing is the best option, though it's not easy to phase that in. So you start with the lowest common denominator, ban all of them. Then work your way up from there.
It boils down to a few people ruining it for everyone else, that's how life works, tough sh!t.