- Jun 8, 2009
- 278
- 3
- 81
I made a mistake 2 days ago and forgot my 400$ 27 inch curved 2560x1440 144hz monitor is freesync ready.
I currently run a 4790k, 16gb ram, and a r9-290 Upgrade from a 12 year old 1680x1050 LCD lol... Obviously my 290 cant handle 2k resolutiob very well getting like 30-40 fps in most games at medium details.
So i decided to check out current video cards and saw vega was 550 for the vega 56 and 600 for the vega 64.. then saw nvidis released a 1070ti and it was only 470$ ( im outdated on current tech ok lol)
Checking out reviews i noticed the 1070ti is the same in performance as the vega 64 it seems.. if not slightly better in most games except for i vulkan games. So thats why i jimped on it because its much cheaper for the same performance ? but i forgot i had a freesync monitor
So i bought the 1070ti paid for next day shipping.. when i got it i realized oops i forgot my monitor has freesync and nvidia doesnt support it.
I played witcher 3. warhammer 2 total war. subnautica and they all had screen tearing.. vsync fixed it though and oddly fps didnt cap at 60 ? it stayed in the 70-100 range i was getting..
BUT when i had freesync on my 290 and compared it to vsync i noticed how much smoother freesync was so thats why im torn plus it seems dumb to me to buy s 400$ monitor like i have.. and not use freesync.....
Buutt when i used freesync on my 290 i noticed i had screen flickering.. like white flickering.. some research pulled up that its common on amd cards to do this.. but others noted its only if fps gets under your freesync range.. which makes sense
Soooo sorry for the long post... My question is should i return this to amazon get my 505$ total back and spend 130$ more (30 is tax) and get the Vega 64 for my new 400$ freesync monitor i bought 2-3 months ago
The vega 64 isnt slower then 1070ti is it ?
I currently run a 4790k, 16gb ram, and a r9-290 Upgrade from a 12 year old 1680x1050 LCD lol... Obviously my 290 cant handle 2k resolutiob very well getting like 30-40 fps in most games at medium details.
So i decided to check out current video cards and saw vega was 550 for the vega 56 and 600 for the vega 64.. then saw nvidis released a 1070ti and it was only 470$ ( im outdated on current tech ok lol)
Checking out reviews i noticed the 1070ti is the same in performance as the vega 64 it seems.. if not slightly better in most games except for i vulkan games. So thats why i jimped on it because its much cheaper for the same performance ? but i forgot i had a freesync monitor
So i bought the 1070ti paid for next day shipping.. when i got it i realized oops i forgot my monitor has freesync and nvidia doesnt support it.
I played witcher 3. warhammer 2 total war. subnautica and they all had screen tearing.. vsync fixed it though and oddly fps didnt cap at 60 ? it stayed in the 70-100 range i was getting..
BUT when i had freesync on my 290 and compared it to vsync i noticed how much smoother freesync was so thats why im torn plus it seems dumb to me to buy s 400$ monitor like i have.. and not use freesync.....
Buutt when i used freesync on my 290 i noticed i had screen flickering.. like white flickering.. some research pulled up that its common on amd cards to do this.. but others noted its only if fps gets under your freesync range.. which makes sense
Soooo sorry for the long post... My question is should i return this to amazon get my 505$ total back and spend 130$ more (30 is tax) and get the Vega 64 for my new 400$ freesync monitor i bought 2-3 months ago
The vega 64 isnt slower then 1070ti is it ?