Craig calls anybody who disagrees with him an idiot or a liar. I'm simply respond to people in the manner in which they respond to others. Someone who presents their ideas respectfully gets my respect in return. Someone who is simply an asshole gets my scorn. It's as simple as that.
You've got the wrong guy there. FWIW you earned those nicknames.Since this thread has turned into a "talk about Craig" thread, I figured I would through out some "nice" posts he has recently made:
...you disingenuous prick...fuck face...shit-for-brains...dickhead...fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick...fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick.
(Yes, that all comes from one individual post)
Still wrong, dumbshit...assface.
Tell you what -- you stop being a disingeuous, fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick, and I'll stop pointing out that you are in fact a disingenuous, fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick. Deal?
Pretty nice mouth he has, eh? All this is in one thread alone.
You've got the wrong guy there. FWIW you earned those nicknames.
You are entitled to your opinion.And you are another example of what is wrong with the forum.
Not ONE of those things you linked to above was said by Craig . . . NOT . . . A . . . SINGLE . . .ONE.Since this thread has turned into a "talk about Craig" thread, I figured I would through out some "nice" posts he has recently made:
...you disingenuous prick...fuck face...shit-for-brains...dickhead...fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick...fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick.
(Yes, that all comes from one individual post)
Still wrong, dumbshit...assface.
Tell you what -- you stop being a disingeuous, fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick, and I'll stop pointing out that you are in fact a disingenuous, fuck-faced, shit-for-brains prick. Deal?
Pretty nice mouth he has, eh? All this is in one thread alone.
Not ONE of those things you linked to above was said by Craig . . . NOT . . . A . . . SINGLE . . .ONE.
Craig didn't even post in that thread.
EPIC FAIL! D:
OOPs...I meant to edit that before the post, but then lost connection to the forum for a bit. LOL I will edit it now. Thanks for pointing that out, it would be horrible to have them attributed to the wrong person!
My sincere apologies to Craig for inadvertantly attributing these posts to him. That was a grave error on my part.
Not ONE of those things you linked to above was said by Craig . . . NOT . . . A . . . SINGLE . . .ONE.
Craig didn't even post in that thread.
EPIC FAIL! D:
Wow cybrsage getting owned hard by the mods, I love it!
That is their MO and they get away with it.
I think that it's people like people that cause all of our problems.
I think that the overall interaction and moderation is ok for a politics and debate forum.
Sometimes the moderation takes a heavy cultural-based subjectivity tone, which I think may be a minor factor that leads to a poor showing of minorities on this forum compared to the overall forum demographics.
(this is a moderator post)
I have sifted through the feedback provided by the community in this thread and assembled a pareto of the results.
Some of the categories are redundant, for example bigotry has always been verboten as are the excessive and egregious personal attacks, so those categories and weightings really ought to be subsumed into the "More consistent enforcement of rules" category.
We can't really use the weightings to reflect community priorities given that it was not a poll and people may have elected to not "+1" previously stated feedback.
I will leave this thread open another day in case folks still want to get in some last minute feedback. After which I will close this thread and open a new thread with a poll for voting so as to better hone in on the community's priorities and concerns.
Administrator Idontcare
and you are perfect?
Mistakes happen-- deal with it!!
The problem is you intentionally do things and get caught....
I am sure you have made an honest mistake, but your track record says otherwise...lolol
Deal with....
See post #4 for an example of what is wrong with this forum.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2220597
:thumbsup: for stats(this is a moderator post)
I have sifted through the feedback provided by the community in this thread and assembled a pareto of the results.
Some of the categories are redundant, for example bigotry has always been verboten as are the excessive and egregious personal attacks, so those categories and weightings really ought to be subsumed into the "More consistent enforcement of rules" category.
We can't really use the weightings to reflect community priorities given that it was not a poll and people may have elected to not "+1" previously stated feedback.
I will leave this thread open another day in case folks still want to get in some last minute feedback. After which I will close this thread and open a new thread with a poll for voting so as to better hone in on the community's priorities and concerns.
Administrator Idontcare