Opteron and X2 explained.

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
First these are the processors in Question. All are 939 and will work in pretty much any 939 board. I think a bios update is needed for early 939 boards.

Opty # of cores Cache per core Ghz Multiplier
165 2 1mb 1.8 9
170 2 1mb 2.0 10
175 2 1mb 2.2 11
180 2 1mb 2.4 12
185 2 1mb 2.6 13

X2
3800 2 512k 2.0 10
4200 2 512k 2.2 11
4400 2 1mb 2.2 11
4600 2 512k 2.4 12
4800 2 1mb 2.4 12

Fx-60 2 1mb 2.6 Unlocked

Which is better?
Well the optys are believed to be binned as better chips. I have never seen any proof of that but it is very plausable. They also tend to overclock better, use less voltage and run cooler. That said if your only going to run them at stock speed you would probably be better of with the X2 equivilent. All dual core retail optys come with a 4 heat pipe HSF that is vastly superior to the old stock HSF. Some of the High end x2s now ship with it also.

165 vs. 3800?
Probably the most asked question. The short answer is that if you have a good board and plan to overclock then go with the 165. You will need a good board do to the 9x multiplier instead of the 10 with the 3800. If your not going to overclock you best bet will be the 3800 unless you find a 165 cheaper. Also the 165 stock HSF is good for moderate overclocks unlike many stock HSF. I cannot say the same for the 3800.

Which should I get 165/170/175/180?
They should all overclock about the same. The steppings will matter more than the Product Number. The only exception is if you need a higher multiplier so that it puts less stress on your board.

If you dont overclock.....no point in buying an opty unless it is cheaper.

Can I hit 3ghz on air?
Probably not. Thats not to say it doesnt happen. To get 3 ghz you must get a great chip a great board and then still get lucky. Just dont buy the processor expecting to get 3ghz out of it. Fx-60 speeds however should be obtainable by almost all optys with some unlucky exceptions.

What board should I get?
To make this easy im just going to say to stick with the DFI NF4 Boards. Im not saying there isnt other boards out there that are just as good. I do know that all of there boards from the Infinity to the high end Lanpartys all overclock well.

So is the Opteron for servers only or can you use one in a desktop?
They definately can be used in a desktop.

Don't Opterons need that expensive memory?
Unlike the 940 opterons no special memory is needed. Just plain old DDR works fine.

How are opteron's for gamming compared to the X2.
At the same clockspeed and the same cache the performance pretty close to the same. A 180 at stock speeds should perform the same as a 4800 except that the 180 may run a bit cooler. The gains come from overclocking with the exception that you will see little gains in framerate above around 2.4 ghz as you are almost completely limited by the video card at that point. If you dont have something at or above a 7800gt then you will reach dimishing returns sooner. Just something to keep in mind.

How do I overclock?
Please read this.

I will be adding additional information later. If you have anything you would like added please post.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Nice thread, I was almost about to start an opteron/x2 thread when I saw this pop up. Anyhow, I've got a question on the 165 and 170. I know the 165 has a 9x multiplier and the 170 has a 10x. Is it worth spending more to get that 10x multiplier with the 170? The motherboard I'm looking at to go with this cpu is the Asus A8N32 SLI, but if the DFI boards overclock just as well then I may go that route.
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Im using a DFI and the motherboard is what limits me. Many people have had better luck with their motherboard than I have had. I cant complain on either account though. I wouldnt spend the extra money unless I already had a board that I knew couldnt handle a cpu with a low multiplier.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Um, going by your sig, all I see is a great overclock with that Ultra-D. How is that limiting?
 

allies

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2002
2,572
0
71
Because he probably cannot boot at a lower multi and higher FSB, thus the mobo being the limiting factor, with the chip's limit unknown.
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: allies
Because he probably cannot boot at a lower multi and higher FSB, thus the mobo being the limiting factor, with the chip's limit unknown.

Thats exactly right. I guess I should have been a little clearer. Its a problem im glad to have though. ;-)
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,567
156
106
321HTT is pretty damn good, IMO.

I've tested mine with a lowered multi up to 345, no issues. Never tried going higher, but I'd be too worried to anyway.
 

Tweakin

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2000
2,532
0
71
Originally posted by: Red Storm
Nice thread, I was almost about to start an opteron/x2 thread when I saw this pop up. Anyhow, I've got a question on the 165 and 170. I know the 165 has a 9x multiplier and the 170 has a 10x. Is it worth spending more to get that 10x multiplier with the 170? The motherboard I'm looking at to go with this cpu is the Asus A8N32 SLI, but if the DFI boards overclock just as well then I may go that route.

As robertk2012 pointed out, going with a lower multi chip just means you have to run your board harder to get to the same freq, i.e. 10x240=2.4Ghz, 9x267=2.4Ghz, 8x300=2.4Ghz and on and on. Most of the better boards out there should hit 300, but once you pass 320 or so it gets harder. I like to opt for the higher multi as I always have the option of using a lower multi to adjust my freq/HTT to max out the performance.
 

the Chase

Golden Member
Sep 22, 2005
1,403
0
0
So is the Opteron for servers only or can you use one in a desktop? Don't they need that expensive memory? Buffet I think it is.
 

necro007

Golden Member
Sep 2, 2005
1,002
0
71
How are opteron's for gamming compared to the X2.

Originally posted by: Tweakin
Originally posted by: Red Storm
Nice thread, I was almost about to start an opteron/x2 thread when I saw this pop up. Anyhow, I've got a question on the 165 and 170. I know the 165 has a 9x multiplier and the 170 has a 10x. Is it worth spending more to get that 10x multiplier with the 170? The motherboard I'm looking at to go with this cpu is the Asus A8N32 SLI, but if the DFI boards overclock just as well then I may go that route.

As robertk2012 pointed out, going with a lower multi chip just means you have to run your board harder to get to the same freq, i.e. 10x240=2.4Ghz, 9x267=2.4Ghz, 8x300=2.4Ghz and on and on. Most of the better boards out there should hit 300, but once you pass 320 or so it gets harder. I like to opt for the higher multi as I always have the option of using a lower multi to adjust my freq/HTT to max out the performance.

Also what did you mean by this.

Is it better to increase the 10,9,8 or it it better to increase the 240,267,300.

Edit: I got it the "240,267,300" are the FSB speeds and the "10,9,8" are the multi.
 

Tweakin

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2000
2,532
0
71
Originally posted by: necro007
How are opteron's for gamming compared to the X2.

Originally posted by: Tweakin
Originally posted by: Red Storm
Nice thread, I was almost about to start an opteron/x2 thread when I saw this pop up. Anyhow, I've got a question on the 165 and 170. I know the 165 has a 9x multiplier and the 170 has a 10x. Is it worth spending more to get that 10x multiplier with the 170? The motherboard I'm looking at to go with this cpu is the Asus A8N32 SLI, but if the DFI boards overclock just as well then I may go that route.

As robertk2012 pointed out, going with a lower multi chip just means you have to run your board harder to get to the same freq, i.e. 10x240=2.4Ghz, 9x267=2.4Ghz, 8x300=2.4Ghz and on and on. Most of the better boards out there should hit 300, but once you pass 320 or so it gets harder. I like to opt for the higher multi as I always have the option of using a lower multi to adjust my freq/HTT to max out the performance.

Also what did you mean by this.

Is it better to increase the 10,9,8 or it it better to increase the 240,267,300.

Edit: I got it the "240,267,300" are the FSB speeds and the "10,9,8" are the multi.

I wouldn't use the term "better", but you can increase the memory throughput by running on a higher bus. If you did a synthetic test of a system @ 2.4Ghz using my above examples and the memory could remain the same and 1T command rate, the system with the 8x multi "should" win due to the increase in memory bandwidth.

Back in the real world, this is normally not an option due to memory, PS unit, etc etc so we opt to the highest possible cpu speed (rule #1) and then tune the memory for latency or throughput (rule #2) and try to keep the system in the 1600-2000 HTT range.
 

l Thomas l

Senior member
Nov 29, 2005
242
0
0
Thanks, this thread helps a lot. I was just starting to look into Opterons and X2 myself.

necro, he meant it's better to have higher multiplier (8, 9, 10).
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: necro007
How are opteron's for gamming compared to the X2.

Originally posted by: Tweakin
Originally posted by: Red Storm
Nice thread, I was almost about to start an opteron/x2 thread when I saw this pop up. Anyhow, I've got a question on the 165 and 170. I know the 165 has a 9x multiplier and the 170 has a 10x. Is it worth spending more to get that 10x multiplier with the 170? The motherboard I'm looking at to go with this cpu is the Asus A8N32 SLI, but if the DFI boards overclock just as well then I may go that route.

As robertk2012 pointed out, going with a lower multi chip just means you have to run your board harder to get to the same freq, i.e. 10x240=2.4Ghz, 9x267=2.4Ghz, 8x300=2.4Ghz and on and on. Most of the better boards out there should hit 300, but once you pass 320 or so it gets harder. I like to opt for the higher multi as I always have the option of using a lower multi to adjust my freq/HTT to max out the performance.

Also what did you mean by this.

Is it better to increase the 10,9,8 or it it better to increase the 240,267,300.

Edit: I got it the "240,267,300" are the FSB speeds and the "10,9,8" are the multi.

Its always better to have a higher multiplier because you can lower if needed. If your not limited by your motherboard (if you get a decent motherboard you probably will not be) you will not need a higher multiplier. Its up to you if its worth paying for the extra headroom that may or may not come into play.
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: the Chase
So is the Opteron for servers only or can you use one in a desktop? Don't they need that expensive memory? Buffet I think it is.

The 939 ones do not need special memory. 940 do.
 

amt

Junior Member
Feb 24, 2006
24
0
0
its fantastic to find the exact questions I need answered.

Now if I can by a Opteron 165 and an Athlon 64x2 3800 for the same price the question everyone like myself is asking which is better bang for buck? Isn't the Athlon because its clock is already higher by 400Mhz? and even when you overclock both chips should the Athlon still come out on top?
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: amt
its fantastic to find the exact questions I need answered.

Now if I can by a Opteron 165 and an Athlon 64x2 3800 for the same price the question everyone like myself is asking which is better bang for buck? Isn't the Athlon because its clock is already higher by 400Mhz? and even when you overclock both chips should the Athlon still come out on top?

Its 200 mhz. And the 165 has 2mb of cache and tends to overclock a bit higher than the 3800. The new 3800 steppings have been doing quite well though but so have the opterons.
 

amt

Junior Member
Feb 24, 2006
24
0
0
I'm keeping a close on eye on this discussion but haven't seen any specific results on comparing the 2 chips on the same board, probably too hard for anyone to do unless they build systems for a living.

But the final result for me would be which chip overclocks better (170 or 3800), by that I mean gives a faster system overall. At least we are comparing same oem clock speed. At the moment comparing the 165 with a slightly lower clock makes the comparison neck and neck. Especially now becuase they are the same price. Now moving to a 170 comparison would make more sense same speed and clock. What do you think?
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: amt
I'm keeping a close on eye on this discussion but haven't seen any specific results on comparing the 2 chips on the same board, probably too hard for anyone to do unless they build systems for a living.

But the final result for me would be which chip overclocks better (170 or 3800), by that I mean gives a faster system overall. At least we are comparing same oem clock speed. At the moment comparing the 165 with a slightly lower clock makes the comparison neck and neck. Especially now becuase they are the same price. Now moving to a 170 comparison would make more sense same speed and clock. What do you think?

We look at the 3800 and the 165 because they are the entry level chips and provide the most value. They are both very similar in price and the 170 would be quite a bit more. It also overclocks about the same as the 165.
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: amt
I'm keeping a close on eye on this discussion but haven't seen any specific results on comparing the 2 chips on the same board, probably too hard for anyone to do unless they build systems for a living.

But the final result for me would be which chip overclocks better (170 or 3800), by that I mean gives a faster system overall. At least we are comparing same oem clock speed. At the moment comparing the 165 with a slightly lower clock makes the comparison neck and neck. Especially now becuase they are the same price. Now moving to a 170 comparison would make more sense same speed and clock. What do you think?

Also comparing 2 chips on the same board wouldnt really mean anything as the chips vary.
 

amt

Junior Member
Feb 24, 2006
24
0
0
Yes, I appreciate the reasoning for the comparison, still good to have but its made my descision no easier, oh the pain! I've only started to look at the 170 instead because of the same cpu speed. Hearing that it clocks about the same as a 165 hurts. Your going to dash my hopes.

Maybe I should post a thread comparing overclocking the 165 v 170 to get some final analysis for my own piece of mind. In the end is it work spending the extra $110AUD? But I don't wish to hijack this thread so please ignore this post if you feel it deserves no commentary.
 

TanisHalfElven

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
3,512
0
76
you sohuld also ad that the x2 3800+ has only 1 mb l2 cache and opty 165 has 2 mb. imo that makes a big difference.
 

robertk2012

Platinum Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
you sohuld also ad that the x2 3800+ has only 1 mb l2 cache and opty 165 has 2 mb. imo that makes a big difference.

Thats already up there.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |