Originally posted by: Giscardo
Nice thread. I nominate this for Sticky.
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: Giscardo
Nice thread. I nominate this for Sticky.
Originally posted by: robertk2012
I dont know much about asus boards since i havent used one since my athlon xp.
Originally posted by: DuoDreamer
Originally posted by: robertk2012
I dont know much about asus boards since i havent used one since my athlon xp.
I have an ASRock (asus' cheap brand) board with an Opty165 on it. I can get it to about 2566MHz stable, higher than that, and I get random lockups in Windows. Your sig says yours is running at 2889.... what core voltage are you pumping it with? I can only hit 1.4v without a volt mod on this board.
Originally posted by: Giscardo
Nice thread. I nominate this for Sticky.
Originally posted by: jose
What about HT's on each chip X2 vs Opteron ? I think the Opteron has 3 HT's and the X2's only 1 HT..
There's a new mobo coming out the Asus K8N-LR http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=247067
I think this mobo w/ pci-e and pci-x will require a Opteron w/ 3 HT's to use both pci-e & pci-x at the same time.
Regards,
Jose
Originally posted by: BriGy86
here i did a comparison on new egg, the opteron 165 has more L2 cache than the 3800+ X2
to get and X2 with the same amount of cache you need to go to the 4400+ and its over 130 dollars more
could the opteron be a better buy even if you don't plan on over clocking
Originally posted by: BriGy86
now that i look at the clock speeds X2 3800+ being 2.0 Ghz and the opt. 165 at 1.8 Ghz (the additional cache for each core i suppose might at rought 200Mhz?)
so there are almost the same, with eh opt. having a better HSF, i suppose you just have to wonder whether the HSF is worth the 30 bucks